Poker Discussion Post

Next > Last »   Poker Discussion

Re(1): AP Resolution In reply to By DexterCain on 10-20-2007 7:44 PM ownd

Re(1): AP Resolution In reply to By Willywoo on 10-20-2007 7:44 PM Removed by whom? And it does not resolve the problem of how a rogue employee/owner exec or whatever could pull off something like this. There were apparently insufficient internal controls at AP to prevent this sort of thing or it is more than two people involved. In NCAA terms there was a "lack of institutional control". The bigger picture, especially for US legislators, is whether the security, regulation and control is adequate.  If this is not resolved, less restrictive regulation in the US is a pipe dream. Nice job btw.

Re(2): AP Resolution In reply to By N 82 50 24 on 10-20-2007 7:45 PM Gaming Commission as I understand it.

Re(1): AP Resolution In reply to By jesterwords on 10-20-2007 7:47 PM I'm interested to say the least.

Re(3): AP Resolution In reply to By gungiclonepot on 10-20-2007 7:47 PM harshaments

Re(3): AP Resolution In reply to By Willywoo on 10-20-2007 7:51 PM Now we're talking.  If KGC can take control and enforce its regulations then it can show the world that there is some form of regulation and enforcement.

Re(1): AP Resolution In reply to By CrazyMarco on 10-20-2007 8:00 PM I am really glad that nat, adanthar and others kept pursuing this huge problem that was obviously going on at AP. Nice job not stopping with there constant lies saying that no cheating ever took place. Very nice work everyone and Im glad to see they finally admitted to the huge problem that was going on with their company and I really reallly can't wait to see what there statement says tomorrow.

Re(2): AP Resolution In reply to By Willywoo on 10-20-2007 8:05 PM The key here for me is that the KGC can and will exercise their power over licensees. Kind of a Marbury v. Madison of online poker. I hope this is what is happening.

Re(2): AP Resolution In reply to By 5aces5 on 10-20-2007 8:12 PM I am sorry, but "banning" somebody forever is lame. Anyone who wants to can open up an account under another name. Why don't they just send him to stand in the corner? They should pull all his hand histories and make him give the money he stole back to its rightful owners. This is the only outcome that could make this right.

Re(1): AP Resolution In reply to By dealace1 on 10-20-2007 8:16 PM Maybe Nat can get some rest until morning. Great job putting it all together.

Re(1): AP Resolution In reply to By hicakipe on 10-20-2007 8:21 PM This still doesn't address the issue of AP's cover-up and phony investigation.

Re(1): AP Resolution In reply to By boozhwaa on 10-20-2007 8:22 PM Good to know. Thanks for all your efforts Nat.

Re(2): AP Resolution In reply to By N 82 50 24 on 10-20-2007 8:23 PM I'm assuming the statement tomorrow will say that the two people high up in the matter are responsible for the coverup.

Re(1): AP Resolution In reply to By xTEDFORRESTx on 10-20-2007 8:23 PM So how does banning two people fix the problem that their security could not detect the most obvious type of cheating, or that chip dumping went on for days?  Banning two people fixes the fact that the company lied? I still don't see how banning two individuals makes your money safe on this site, unless those two people were the entire security team.

Return to Top Poker Discussion Page 1 of 6 (89 items) 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »