Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local

Book Review: Harrington on Cash Games[ return to main articles page ]

By: grapsfan
Published on Jul 27th, 2008
Whenever anyone asks me for an opinion on the Harrington on Hold’em books, I give them the same two answers:

1) They are the best books about how to play NL Hold’em tournaments on the market, in terms both of strategies to be a successful player, and the easy-to-digest manner in which the material is presented.

2) You can’t buy just one or the other…they are designed as a set. It’s easier to carry around, and sell, two 350-page books than one 700-page book.

After doing their best to teach the world how to play tournaments, Dan Harrington and Bill Robertie are back with a two-volume set, “Harrington on Cash Games”. Whereas the HoH books dove deeply into “M”, “Q”, danger zones, and other concepts and techniques to play the medium- and short-stacked decisions key to tournament success, HoCG takes on the challenge of defining a comprehensive approach to deep-stacked play.

For those of you who have read the Harrington on Hold’em books, especially those (like me) who base their tournament strategy on this foundation, the Cash Game books are like a phone call from an old friend. The straightforward writing style, real-world examples (High Stakes Poker hands are used instead of WPT/WSOP final table moments) and dozens of problems to analyze…it’s all the same as before….

The strength of the two books is their consistent focus on addressing the most common mistakes tournament players make in cash games, like overvaluing good-but-not-great hands like top pair/top kicker or bottom two pair. The phrase “small hand, small pot; big hand, big pot” is consistently use throughout a variety of applicable situations. I also got a lot of his ideas on changing starting hand requirements and betting patterns based on the relative stack sizes of the opponents in the hand. Harrington, as always, is as good as it gets at taking a topic which seems obvious after he presents it, but in retrospect, you recognize it as a leak in your game.

And yet, I’m not sure I recommend the HoCG books as strongly as I do HoH, for two major reasons:

1) Harrington & Robertie attempt to take on every aspect of deep-stack poker fundamentals. In doing so, they decided to start at the very beginning, with explanations of pot odds, counting outs, bluffs and semi-bluffs, and bet sizing to price draws in or out of a hand. To borrow a phrase from my disc jockey days, there’s “more filler, less killer.” There is a lot more prose in these two books than in the tournament books, limiting their effectiveness for much of the potential audience.

2) At the time the original “Harrington on Hold’em” books were released, the vast majority of tournament players, from micro-stakes to the highest of live buy-ins, were uncomfortable making many of the decisions emphasized in the books. Everyone could learn from them, and the strategies worked all the way to the top, as shown by Harrington’s win at the 2007 Legends, runner-up at the 2005 Festa al Lago, and quarterfinal appearance in the 2006 Mirage Heads-Up…on a limited playing schedule, after he told the world what he was doing. The Cash Game books preach a tight-aggressive style of play, which will be easily exploited if attempted at a higher level. Harrington’s examples are mostly set in a 5/10 NL cash game, a game I have no personal experience in…but as I read through them, I kept thinking a player of this style would get run over in most 5/10 NL online games, not to mention moving up into truly rarified air. If Harrington has a theory on what to do when durrr or sbrugby 3-bet shoves the flop in a pot worth more than my car, with a range of Any Two Cards…this book ain’t sharing it.

That said, please don’t take these comments as any sort of negative endorsement. Being “pretty close but not quite” as good as the most valuable poker books ever written is no sin.

There is an enormous audience of players who have been successful in SNGs or MTTs, who have yet to solve the mystery of deep-stacked cash game play. Admittedly, I’m one of them. I’ve avoiding taking a serious cash game plunge for the last couple of years, partially because the subtleties were lost on me (frankly, I’d get bored), but mostly because I stink at them. I look forward to improving my play with continued study and application of the lessons in “Harrington on Cash Games”, moving from donator to dominator. And I hope nobody else gets as much out of these books as I will.

Order Harrington on Cash Games

Comments

  1. <p>Volume II covers LAG play.</p>
  2. <p>halfway through the first look forward to the second. It's been a bit too simple so far but so was volume 1 for tourneys. should be a good read rest of the way out</p>
     
  3. <p>Yes, kronik, Vol. 2 covers LAG play...but not NEARLY to the extent of the tight style recommended.  There's 5 chapters on tight play, 1 on loose.</p>
     
    Thread Starter
  4. <p>just started reading volume 2 for the 2nd time</p>
  5. <p>Great article graps, a review of HoCG was overdue</p>
  6. <p>Is there any other cash game pros who could recomend or otherwise not advise these books as a good read?</p>
  7. <p>Harringtn does not play cash games.  Name when  and where. Dan is a real estate entrepreneur/tournament poker player, not a cash game player.</p>
  8. <p>Harrington does not play cash games.  Name when and where if he does.  Dan is a real estate entrepreneur/tournament poker player.  Not a cash game poker player.</p>
  9. <p>I imagine though MtMike, Harrington has a little experience with cash games.  He did hone his craft at the Mayfair Club in NYC.</p>
  10. <p>I imagine though MtMike, Harrington has a little experience with cash games.  He did hone his craft at the Mayfair Club in NYC.</p>
  11. <p>Hi grapsfan, always enjoy your articles, keep 'em coming!</p>
    <p>I agree that there are fewer pages dedicated to LAG style. But Harrington's LAG builds on TAG, so it would have been redundant to restate many of the TAG principles. </p>
    <p>Even his "TAG" principles for cash game play are much looser than the TAG play advocated in the tournament books. I wonder what the PT stats would be if you play Harrington's TAG cash game style? </p>
    <p>IMO, many people think LAG is simply a wider hand range + slightly less aggressive post-flop play, to compensate for the differences in hand strength. Harrington takes it further, and identifies 9 "moves" that the LAG player can make, due to this small change. Overall, I think his LAG chapter is a good step forward in better defining LAG style, its benefits, etc.</p>
  12. <p>I've seen Harrington on the Ultimate Poker Challenge's  Ulitimate Cash game playing 100/200 at Binions.</p>
  13. <p>Excellent points, kronik...the only point I wanted to make in the review is that someone expecting to develop an ultra-LAG style to hang with durrr and Genius28 isn't going to get it in this book.</p>
    <p>MtMike, Dan Harrington learned how to play poker in cash games on the East Coast, and then in Bay Area card clubs after he moved to California.  He has said on numerous occasions that he often went to the WSOP only to play side games, and usually the main event.  Congrats, however, on having such great conviction in making a completely inaccurate statement.</p>
     
    Thread Starter
  14. <p>Ive seen Harrington in the HS cash games at Commerce Casino on many occasions.</p>
 

Return to Articles

Quick Navigation