[x]

Churchill Downs Applies for Nevada Interactive Gaming License[ return to main articles page ]

By: Dan Katz    [See all articles by Dan Katz]
Published on Jul 17th, 2012
Churchill Downs, Inc., owner of the home of the Kentucky Derby, has applied for an interactive gaming license in Nevada, according to Howard Stutz of the Las Vegas Review-Journal. Should the application be approved, Churchill Downs could be among the first companies to offer online gambling services to residents of the state.

The Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB) issued licenses to a handful of companies in June, though they were different than the one for which Churchill Downs applied. Rival firms Bally Technologies and International Game Technology (IGT) were both unanimously approved, but they will not be the ones offering the games. Instead, they'll be the firms to supply the systems and technology to companies like Churchill Downs, who will run the sites.

Thus, for Bally and IGT, it’s just a matter of patience now as Churchill Downs and dozens of other casino operators await the NGCB's rulings on their applications.

The NGCB also registered Gaming Laboratories International and BMM International to test interactive gaming equipment in Nevada. The two companies have years of experience, including testing Bally's and IGT's systems, so once companies start getting the ball rolling on their gambling offerings, the testing process should go much faster than if brand new companies were registered.

Churchill Downs is no stranger to online gambling. While it is best known for live horse racing and the Kentucky Derby in particular, it owns the online betting site TwinSpires.com. The site is registered in Oregon and takes bets from United States residents. Anyone of legal age can create an account on TwinSpires.com and bet on the ponies. Churchill Downs also acquired TwinSpires’ main rival, YouBet.com, in 2010 and merged the two sites under the TwinSpires brand.

Churchill Downs got into the poker industry earlier this year when it acquired the Atlanta-based poker media firm Bluff. The acquisition included the popular assets of Bluff including Bluff Magazine, Bluff.com, BluffMagazine.com, ThePokerDB online tournament database, and “a variety of leading blogs, forums, news, and editorial content, and tournament and player rankings designed to serve the in-depth content interests of poker enthusiasts throughout the United States.”

At the time, a press release on TheStreet, read, in part, that Churchill Downs “believes this acquisition potentially provides it with new business avenues to pursue in the event there is a liberalization of state or Federal laws with respect to internet poker in the United States.”

The news that Churchill Downs has applied for an interactive gaming license in Nevada certainly legitimizes that statement. To date, Bluff Media has never actually offered online gambling services such as poker. It now appears that the poker media company could be branching out should Churchill Downs' application be approved.

We do not know, however, how a potential online poker site would be branded. It may use the Churchill Downs name, TwinSpires name, Bluff name, or something completely different. That remains to be seen.

Nevada approved online poker regulations at the end of 2011, passing Regulation 5A, which laid out the rules for intrastate online poker.

Once companies get their rooms up and running, which could be as soon as early 2013, they will only be allowed to serve customers who are at least 21 years old and within Nevada state borders. Credit cards will be permitted as a means of deposit, although inter-account transfers will not be allowed. Operators must keep five years’ worth of hand histories and take steps to prevent bot use.

The opinion in the industry is that Nevada is looking long-term when it comes to online poker licensing. When the day comes that the game is legalized and regulated at the Federal level, Nevada hopes to use its potential position as a leader in online poker to attract companies to set up shop in the state.

Comments

  1. Is my memory fucked, or didn't Churchill Downs/horse racing industry in general used to be one of the biggest opponents of online poker/gambling?
     
  2.  
    Originally Posted by smcrawford2 View Post

    Is my memory fucked, or didn't Churchill Downs/horse racing industry in general used to be one of the biggest opponents of online poker/gambling?


    Apparently they are only against anyone else making money if they dont get their share.
  3.  
    Originally Posted by smcrawford2 View Post

    Is my memory fucked, or didn't Churchill Downs/horse racing industry in general used to be one of the biggest opponents of online poker/gambling?

    Horse racing received a carve-out from the UIGEA back in 2006, along with state lotteries and fantasy sports. So, online betting on horse racing is permitted. And, if you can make money by hosting online poker games in a legalized and regulated environment, then why not?
     
  4. Its right in my backyard. They call it "Suffering Downs"
  5. A while back,they bought Bluff magazine, The pokerdb, and I believe onlinepokerrankings as well, so they have wanted in on poker for a while. Their own state denied them slot machines to subsidize their racing purses, and they know they can't rely on racing handle alone anymore. They own twinspires.com, which is the largest online horse racing site in the US, so there is some interesting possibilities if they want in on poker, because many federal congressman will back the play of a Thoroughbred giant like Churchill downs if it wants poker, where otherwise they might not (hence UIGEA exemptions for horse racing). But it's all speculation at this point, and it's getting real hard to know who has the real power in this ongoing saga of getting online poker back in the US. I for one have started to really grow weary of the whole thing, and almost don't care anymore. Of course, I'm also seriously considering moving out of the US.
  6.  
    Originally Posted by smcrawford2 View Post

    Is my memory fucked, or didn't Churchill Downs/horse racing industry in general used to be one of the biggest opponents of online poker/gambling?

    They were a big opponent of online gambling, but for the more obvious reason of horse players betting horses offshore. In a pari-mutual system (which all US racing employs), the tracks and the state governments get a piece of all the money bet into the pools, and the rest gets distributed to the winners. But since the takeouts are so high, offshore shops were giving horse players better payoffs and also nice rebates on their bets (which they could afford because the takeouts are so high which create the payoff amounts at the tracks). So smart horseplayers were betting offshore, and the tracks wanted that shut down, because they didnt get any part of the bets, even though they were putting out the product.

    While the horse racing lobby, and anti-gambling zealots like Focus on the Family played a part in making UIGEA happen, the only one who had the power to actually get in done at the hands of Bill Frist at the midnight hour was Martin Gold, the power lobbyist representing the NFL. The NFL is the main reason the UIGEA got passed (along with Rep. Leach's Iowa support for Frist's presidential aspirations), and the fact that Attorney General Eric Holder was once their top legal representative makes you wonder how much of a part did they have in Black Friday.

    I am ashamed that the poker community has done nothing to backlash the NFL for what they did to all of us, and I include myself because I haven't done anything except bitch and moan. We got assaulted by the NFL, yet we are still watching football on Sunday's, and the NFL hasn't been harassed, or publicly admonished or boycotted in any way by us.
  7. Agreed. The NFL is one of the biggest slime ball operations going. Pre UIGEA they were adament about not allowing any sort of gambling related advertisement/sponsorship of any sort. Now that the landscape is aligned in their favor, they made a statement recently about reversing their course in that regard and changing that policy.

    My father in law has had Bears season tickets since he was 21 years old. They're 6th row seats. Amazing. He doesn't go to games anymore as he's getting older, so he often gave the tickets to me. Since all this shit went down I couldn't bring myself to attend anymore games. He's been wanting to transfer the tickets into my wifes name, but we've kinda been putting him off because its so expensive. AND you have to pay for the whole season (including preseason) in full by the beginning of March! God, I'd love to have a business where I get paid in full 6 months before I actually do the work. And they send this really arrogant letter reminding you how long the waiting list is if you don't act in their timeline. Fuck them. Now I just sell all the tickets on Craigslist to the highest bidder.

    so in a way I feel like at least I'm making some of the money back that they fucked me out of by getting online poker banned. But you are right, more should be done.
     
  8.  
    Originally Posted by smcrawford2 View Post

    Is my memory fucked, or didn't Churchill Downs/horse racing industry in general used to be one of the biggest opponents of online poker/gambling?

    yes they only way any form of gambling comes to kentucky is if churchill owns the monoply on it . whethers its casino or online poker.
 
Page 1 of 11

Return to Articles

Quick Navigation