Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local

Everleaf Gets Cease and Desist Letter from Homeland Security, Pulls Out of U.S.[ return to main articles page ]

By: Dan
Published on Feb 10th, 2012
In breaking news, the Everleaf Gaming Network has received a cease and desist letter from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The letter contained a warning to stop taking real money action from U.S. players “or the directors and owners of the network would be subject to legal proceedings,” according to an e-mail from Minted Poker officials received by PocketFives on Thursday around 8:30pm ET.

The Everleaf Network is expected to provide further information on Friday about its decision, which involved input from the Maltese Lotteries and Gaming Authority (LGA). The letter continued, “The Directors of the Network and their legal counsel met with the Maltese Licensing Authority, the LGA, and asked advice under their license agreement. The LGA advised that the network should pull out of the U.S. and French markets completely and as quickly as possible. They are also going to aid in discussions in how player funds held in ring-fenced accounts are cashed out back to the players affected.”

The decision to stop taking U.S. and French players reportedly went into effect at the close of business on Thursday. The same e-mail read, “There will be a series of announcements from the network starting [on Friday] regarding the situation and the process. We will keep you all informed as we receive information [in order to] make this process bearable for those affected, who should always be our primary concern.”

The e-mail sent from Minted Poker also labeled the withdrawal from the U.S. and French markets an “opportunity to refocus” the Network’s efforts.

Over on TwoPlusTwo, MintedNeil, the site’s official forum representative, provided a little more background, noting that Everleaf “lost one of the U.S. processors” several weeks ago. Apparently, according to the same source, Homeland Security was behind the funds seizure.

MintedNeil added that the process of returning player funds will involve discussions with Homeland Security: “I have been informed that the Network and LGA will now commence proceedings with Homeland Security as to how these funds are returned to players. Hopefully once agreed, the cashout process will be swift, so as not to cause undue stress to the parties involved.”

You’ll recall that Full Tilt Poker, UB, and Absolute Poker have all failed to pay back players after those three rooms were driven from the U.S. market 10 months ago. The former is in talks to sell its assets to Groupe Bernard Tapie, while the latter two are rumored to be liquidating. Whether Everleaf players will be refunded in a judicious time frame remains to be seen. Only PokerStars has made good on player cashouts and continues to be the largest online poker room in the world.

The Network now plans to forge on as a European-facing entity. MintedNeil explained, “All European funds are safe and the European network will continue. The only noticeable change will be that the network will shortly change all accounts into Euro accounts and, of course, the American players will be missing from the tables.”

You can read the full text of the statement by visiting the Poker Sites thread.

One PocketFives poster from Texas reacted to the news by saying, “Sigh, two days after I put money back on this site. At least there seems to be a procedure for returning player funds.”

Another PocketFives member asserted that the cease and desist letter and subsequent decision to pull out of the U.S. and French markets could spell doom for Everleaf altogether: “I don't see how this network will survive. Their customer support, cashout conditions, and general angle shooting by more than one skin are horrible. The only reason they were able to get away with this is that they continued to service U.S. customers. GL people in the U.S. that have money on this site in collecting.”

According to PokerScout, Everleaf is the 27th largest network worldwide and has a seven-day running average of 395 real money ring game players. At the time of writing on Friday around 11:00am ET, there were 604 cash game players seated.

The Merge Gaming Network, Bovada, and the Cake Poker Network, among other brands, continue to accept real money deposits from the U.S. market post-Black Friday. Whether these sites will take any action following Everleaf’s departure is not clear. PocketFives does not recommend playing on sites offering rake-based games in the U.S. Your deposits and withdrawals are at risk. Instead, we recommend ClubWPT and HogWild Poker, which do not take rake.

Visit the thread in the Poker Sites forum for more details and reaction.

Comments

  1. Again someone needs to explain to me very slowly what grounds we have for sending a cease and desist letter. Since the DOJ clarification shouldn't banks be able to again do business with poker sites? If the banks aren't prohibited from doing business with poker sites then nobody should have to launder money or commit fraud to get around regulations that according to the DOJ were never intended for poker sites in the first place.
     
  2. On Merge Network no fraud is being committed. You simply make an online purchase, and use the gift card that you purchased to deposit. You can also send WU for deposits and cashouts. I do think the bankwire option is a little sketchy, and I really wish they wouldn't use that. The DOJ needs to realize they were wrong in shutting down these poker site because technically playing poker online was never "illegal". Only the money laundering and bank fraud was illegal. This is complete bullshit. I really hope Merge Network isn't next to get the boot. Looks like we need to start cashing out our accounts now because the situation is getting a little hairy. Luckily I cashed most of my balance out last week, but because of this I will be withdrawing more here soon.
  3. You don't really need any grounds to send a C&D, at least as far as I understand. A C&D basically is just basically someone telling someone else to cease an activity. Generally the implication is that if the activity is stopped, no further action will be pursued. I don't think that's always the case though. It doesn't necessarily mean that action will be pursued if the activity continues either. But it's more or less a warning "If you continue doing this, we might pursue action."C&D's basically are a not costly attempt to quickly resolve a dispute.
     
  4. The government is full of criminals that is why they are doing things like this its,1 huge mafia

    family The Bush Crime Family lives on 0bama style!!
  5.  
    Originally Posted by MuckYaSelf View Post

    On Merge Network no fraud is being committed. You simply make an online purchase, and use the gift card that you purchased to deposit. You can also send WU for deposits and cashouts. I do think the bankwire option is a little sketchy, and I really wish they wouldn't use that. The DOJ needs to realize they were wrong in shutting down these poker site because technically playing poker online was never "illegal". Only the money laundering and bank fraud was illegal. This is complete bullshit. I really hope Merge Network isn't next to get the boot. Looks like we need to start cashing out our accounts now because the situation is getting a little hairy. Luckily I cashed most of my balance out last week, but because of this I will be withdrawing more here soon.

    Umm except that is the very definition of money laundering-making a payment to a third party who therein completes the transaction.
  6. I think the poker sites should sue and name The Department of Treasury, The Department of Justice, The Department of Homeland Security and Banks who are blocking transactions. This should have been done long before "Black Friday" and instead of committing fraud, the sites should have argued that under US law they at no time were or are running "illegal gambling" businesses and need judicial relief. With the DOJ penning an opinion that states that the Wire Act only applies to sports betting (An opinion and position taken by the poker sites that remained in the US after the passage of the UIGEA). Considering that the IGBA requires a violation of state law, and the UIGEA relies on other laws to define what is "illegal gambling" the only places in the US that poker is illegal is in states that have specifically outlawed it {Example; State of Washington}. I think that poker sites should consider pushing forward with such action. If new US law and regulation is passed in the near future a favorable ruling would at a minimum favor the sites in any future wrongful prosecution for conducting business in a lawful manner prior to the passage of the new law , and in the absence of any new law would assure their rights to legally conduct business without threat from the US.
    Edited By: higonp Feb 10th, 2012 at 07:15 PM
  7. I think many of you are overly optimistic about the compliance of the sites you play on. I can understand this, as I was the same way for a long time. I'm not anymore though - I am pretty confident at this point that the DOJ strongly opines that these online poker sites are breaking the law. Not only that, I'm also confident that the DOJ has a very hostile attitude towards the online gaming industry at this time. Everyone has to make their own choice about whether or not to stay on the boat. Just know that these companies are sailing in very dangerous waters
     
  8.  
    Originally Posted by MuckYaSelf View Post

    On Merge Network no fraud is being committed. You simply make an online purchase, and use the gift card that you purchased to deposit. You can also send WU for deposits and cashouts. I do think the bankwire option is a little sketchy, and I really wish they wouldn't use that. The DOJ needs to realize they were wrong in shutting down these poker site because technically playing poker online was never "illegal". Only the money laundering and bank fraud was illegal. This is complete bullshit. I really hope Merge Network isn't next to get the boot. Looks like we need to start cashing out our accounts now because the situation is getting a little hairy. Luckily I cashed most of my balance out last week, but because of this I will be withdrawing more here soon.

    pfffffffffffffffttttt
     1
  9. Ive recently been having troubles getting my money off the site. Because i deposited with my netspend and they cant cash out to credit cards or by check. They said i had to redeposit via picclub or westernunion then they could cash out to which ever option i redeposited with. Money still on the site
  10. Just like when BF occurred, this all comes down to big brother not getting his cut of the $$$. If I want to walk into my local convenience store and waste $500 on lottery tickets, well that's perfectly fine and no one is there trying to protect me from making a bad decision. God forbid I want to play online poker for real money.
    Edited By: DeaconMike Feb 10th, 2012 at 08:42 PM
  11. EverLeaf. I don't think anyone will miss them. The real question is will Merge be next? I think that's the only site most U.S. players care about any more. Bovado and their random bs sucks even worse now than when you could only play 4 tables and it was Bodog. Cake pretty lame also.
    Bleak getting bleaker.
  12. The gov has to squeeze out all the competition before they can use our Full Tilt money to start up their own Federally run poker sites. Monopolize
  13. USA, USA, USA!
  14. It seems strange that they would go after such a small site...why did they not go for the biggest US-facing site remaining: Merge? God I hope I get this 2k off of Cake soon!
  15.  
    Originally Posted by Adam View Post

    I think many of you are overly optimistic about the compliance of the sites you play on. I can understand this, as I was the same way for a long time. I'm not anymore though - I am pretty confident at this point that the DOJ strongly opines that these online poker sites are breaking the law. Not only that, I'm also confident that the DOJ has a very hostile attitude towards the online gaming industry at this time. Everyone has to make their own choice about whether or not to stay on the boat. Just know that these companies are sailing in very dangerous waters

    But the reason the sites are doing this was to circumvent the UIGEA. There is no law against playing poker. It is the transfer of funds that is getting everyone in trouble. Since DOJ has opined that poker does not in fact come under this, why don't the sites just do how they were doing in the beginning. Be upfront with every transaction. eg. Rounder deposited $500. He won money playing poker. He took out $100 of winnings. Rounder files taxes and pays on the $100 of winnings. Rounder still has assets of $500 principal that he deposited on site. This is not income. Sites, Do not use third party payment processors.
  16. There are now rumors that this did not even happen and that Everleaf is trying to scam people
  17.  
    Originally Posted by The Smoking Pimp View Post

    There are now rumors that this did not even happen and that Everleaf is trying to scam people

    Interesting. My first thought when I saw this was "what does Homeland Security care about here?" DOJ makes sense. But DHS? This whole thing strikes me as weird. Not that anyone should put real credence into rumors at this point.
     
  18.  
    Originally Posted by The Baby Bull View Post

    Interesting. My first thought when I saw this was "what does Homeland Security care about here?" DOJ makes sense. But DHS? This whole thing strikes me as weird. Not that anyone should put real credence into rumors at this point.

    Baby Bull: I agree. Why in hell does Homeland Security suddenly pop up in the middle of all this ? We have seen the DOJ and FBI stick their corrupt noses in this before, and now DHS wants a piece of the action ? What other three letter acronym incompetent government organizations want to jump on board: DEA FAA IRS DOD DOE ???
 

Return to Articles

Quick Navigation