[x]

Frank Fahrenkopf: New Federal Poker Bill Could Be Introduced Soon[ return to main articles page ]

By: Dan Katz    [See all articles by Dan Katz]
Published on Feb 21st, 2013
Last year, poker fans in the United States sat with fingers crossed hoping that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D–Nev., pictured) and long-time poker foe Senator Jon Kyl (R–Ariz.) could work some magic and get a Federal bill passed that would legalize and regulate online poker. Not only did a bill not pass, it never got introduced, and the dreams of reviving the online game in the U.S. fizzled.

---

Daily fantasy sports is legal to wager on in most states in the USA. Check out DraftKings.com for your shot at turning $1 into $100,000 today. Visit DraftKings today.

---

This week, though, American Gaming Association Chairman Frank Fahrenkopf told Jim Ralston on the Nevada political news/talk television program “Ralston Reports” that he believes another bill could be introduced in Congress soon. He is not looking for Reid to be the one to do it, though, as it looks like, at least for now, Reid has his sights set on more pressing issues in the Senate. He quoted Reid as saying that getting something passed right now in the Senate is like “threading a needle.”

Fahrenkopf went on to say, however, “I think that we may see one quite soon in the House… There’s still an effort in the House.”

He continued, “Plus, I think the activity of a number of states, particularly Delaware, where they… have authorized all forms of casino games through their state lottery, and they’re hoping to go onboard by September 30th of this year. So, when I said a long time ago that as a result of the change in the Justice Department’s position, we could see the largest expansion of legal gaming in this country’s history, if states start to emulate what Delaware’s doing, I think that’s what will happen. And I think there are some members of Congress who normally are very anti-gaming who view a poker bill as the lesser of a lot of evils. So, I’m still hopeful that we can get something done.”

When asked by Ralston who would be the person to carry an online gambling bill in the House, Fahrenkopf pointed to Rep. Joe Barton (R–Tex., pictured), who has done so before. Fahrenkopf said that Barton is doing some “spade work” with other members of Congress to see where he might be able to go with such a bill.

According to Fahrenkopf, initial movement on the matter could happen quickly, possibly as soon as the next two weeks.

The conversation then shifted to the possibility of interstate gaming compacts. There are a couple of bills that have been introduced in the Nevada state legislature that would authorize the Governor to make deals with other states. There has also been talk in Delaware about compacts with not just other states, but also other countries.

Fahrenkopf warned that interstate compacts might not be as easy as they look, saying, “There’s one little thing that’s involved in this, and that is that most people don’t realize Article 1, Section 10 of the Constitution… provides that interstate compacts must be approved by Congress.”

He added, “Now, historically what has happened… Congress has just ignored them and they’ve gone forward without any action. But when you’ve got something, a hot issue like gaming, you can be very sure that either the right or left, someone could say, ‘Well, we wanna, Congress wants to debate it.”

As for whether or not a Federal online gaming bill will be passed this year, Fahrenkopf said he is “hopeful,” but “it’s harder than it was last year, and it was a long shot last year.”

Want the latest poker headlines and interviews? Follow PocketFives on Twitter and Like PocketFives on Facebook. You can also subscribe to our RSS feed.

Comments

  1. yada, yada, yada..
  2. im gonna kick tommorow...jane said
  3. I'll take "How to get the state to pass the legislation you want." for $1000 Alex.
  4. 2013 seems like the perfect window of opportunity.

    Jobs, tax revenues, and no national elections; it's time to get this thing done!!!
  5. like the 1st guy said, yada yada yada

    online poker in the US no longer exists to me. douchebag american politicians. should be ashamed of yourselves for stopping your people from playing.

    utterly disappointing. almost 2 years on from BF, and nothing has been done. fo shizzle!
  6. w/e
     
  7. “We cannot wait any longer for Congress to act,” Sandoval said to a legislative committee Thursday.Read more: http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2013...#ixzz2La7qCm9m
     
  8. The distinguished ladies and gentlemen of Congress would much rather throw sticks and stones at one another than do something positive for the citizens. I am not optimistic.
  9. Yawn.
  10. Now is the time! Each and every state are desperate for any type of extra revenue. Happy to pay federal or state tax on any winnings as long as it's fair.
  11.  
    Originally Posted by muddyriver View Post

    Now is the time! Each and every state are desperate for any type of extra revenue. Happy to pay federal or state tax on any winnings as long as it's fair.

    I think this it the sentiment that a lot of poker players can agree with. I'm sure most would be happy to pay Federal or State taxes on online poker winnings if they felt secure depositing, withdrawing, and playing.
     
  12. Not only is Fahrenkopf a pimp for Nevada corporations, trying desperately to stop PokerStars (who they cant beat in fair competition) from coming back to the US market, but he is laughable with his twisted fabrication of the US Constitution.

    Article 1, Section 10, in regards to congressional approval regarding state compacts has been visited by the courts for over a century (Virginia vs Tennessee 148US 503, 518 as just one example), and without boring everyone with 3 paragraphs of legal mumbo jumbo, let's just say that Fahrenkopf is a moron for even suggesting something so stupid in regards to state online poker compacts.

    It is an interesting sidenote that this same section of the US Constitution forbids the states to make any thing but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts. Fahrenkopf might as well use that argument, as it has more relevance than the later definition he wants to imply has bearing on his views.
  13. I JUST WANT MY LIFE BACK MAN!
     
  14.  
    Originally Posted by cabbie182 View Post

    I JUST WANT MY LIFE BACK MAN!

    Greed, hypocrisy and the thirst for power and control have certainly taken away a lot of the liberties and freedoms we once enjoyed and came to expect and reading this article does not give me much hope that we will anytime soon return to those freedoms in this country which claims to be the leader of the "free world" :(
  15. Who would have thought that living in the USA was going to end up being a bad beat in regards to what I can access in my own home.....WTF?
  16.  
    Originally Posted by timthegem View Post


    LOLOLOLOLOL.....so OI...from now on i'll just assume it never gets legislated in the U.S., so if it actually ever does ill be :D
     
 
Page 1 of 11

Return to Articles

Quick Navigation