-
yawn wheres ur results on other networks
-
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...postcount=7744
Edited By: tyson219 Jun 7th, 2012 at 10:52 PM
wug now? -
Guess you have rigged ACR as well. ;)
Sick score there, i'm jello :) -
someone will figure it out soon.
-
why? i dont grind high stakes i take shots with satellites, single bullets etc....and ive actually done quite well, FTing the high roller, 3rd in $109 cubed, several deep runs in the sunday 109 etc...you dont believe me that scope/OPR are innacurate thats your problem, i know what ive deposited and what ive cashed out.
fwiw, ive played right at 6k games in $50 and below where my avg roi is right around 40%.
ive played about 310 games above $50 with many final tables and avg roi of 30% and you really think im down money?
how can someone have 100k in cashes with an avg buy in below $11 in 6k games and be a losing player? i dont even need to do the math just look at those three figures and its common sense. check out my results in sattelites on merge. -
Edited By: OhScissorMe Jun 8th, 2012 at 02:13 AM
I know this is a foreign concept to you so I'll try to make it simple so you can understand. Some people get BETTER at poker and work on their game over the years. Others spend that time trolling every single poker forum they can find trying to legitimize some insane and obnoxious theory they have come up with to why they can't win consistently. I'll leave out names though because I don't want to get too personal. -
Your graph goes almost straight up at those stakes. Have you been cheating? colluding? chip dumping?
Originally Posted by ktx49
why? i dont grind high stakes i take shots with satellites, single bullets etc....and ive actually done quite well, FTing the high roller, 3rd in $109 cubed, several deep runs in the sunday 109 etc...you dont believe me that scope/OPR are innacurate thats your problem, i know what ive deposited and what ive cashed out.
fwiw, ive played right at 6k games in $50 and below where my avg roi is right around 40%.
ive played about 310 games above $50 with many final tables and avg roi of 30% and you really think im down money?
how can someone have 100k in cashes with an avg buy in below $11 in 6k games and be a losing player? i dont even need to do the math just look at those three figures and its common sense. check out my results in sattelites on merge.
You accuse HS players with good graphs of cheating. Therefore, if your graph is good, you must also be cheating? Care to the explain how the logic applies to us but not to you? -
Ya pretty sick individual indeed.
-
This makes me : )
Originally Posted by tyson219
Your graph goes almost straight up at those stakes. Have you been cheating? colluding? chip dumping?
You accuse HS players with good graphs of cheating. Therefore, if your graph is good, you must also be cheating? Care to the explain how the logic applies to us but not to you? -
Originally Posted by ktx49
must not pay attention to avg ROI...id say 30% over 6k games after an epic downswing is not shabby:

couldnt resist:

http://www.pocketfives.com/f12/cheat...ml#post6894377
u sure do know a lot about cheating at lower stakes it appears -
so now i got the Merge Mafia jealous of my results....sounds like an epic .jpg
-
Edited By: tyson219 Jun 8th, 2012 at 07:36 PMThis ^^^ did not answer my question. But it's okay, we all know when someone asks you for evidence, to apply logic, to construct coherent thoughts, etc, you dodge the issue and fall back on misdirection.Originally Posted by ktx49
so now i got the Merge Mafia jealous of my results....sounds like an epic .jpg
Originally Posted by tyson219
Your graph goes almost straight up at those stakes. Have you been cheating? colluding? chip dumping?
You accuse HS players with good graphs of cheating. Therefore, if your graph is good, you must also be cheating? Care to the explain how the logic applies to us but not to you?
Reason: i predict a novel length response to this, but the question wont actually be answered -
no time for Merge Mafia today sorry guys
-
Edited By: ILoseRaces Jun 11th, 2012 at 07:20 PMKavilla, here's a brief tutorial on how to properly assess your sharkscope data.Originally Posted by ktx49
must not pay attention to avg ROI...id say 30% over 6k games after an epic downswing is not shabby:

1) gtfo with the filter to show proof of your overall play. how much of that profit at less than $35 MTTs were satellite tickets that got used, and profit lost? i'm guessing a fair amount over that sample size. and taking shots doesnt exclude a tournament from counting for or against your results. here, i'll do it for you. and i'll even exclude SnG's as this is primarily a discussion of MTT results: KAVILLA 6,306 -$0.1 $13 30% -$606 - 69 Merge Sch. Only
2) avg ROI on the sharkscope data doesnt really mean much. you can be a net loser and have a healthy average ROI. The better indicator(s) are avg profit per game ($3 profit at $8 abi is agreeably very good) and the total ROI that can be found under 'miscellaneous data' in the More Options feature. somewhere on sharkscope you can find the formulas for Total ROI and average ROI and see the differences.
3) 400 game downswings aren't that epic, you should know this based on your claims of having plenty of experience and having put in plenty of volume
4) over 5k games, it looks like you have ~$6k of your $15k profit from 2 wins. this is very important, and shows some very large positive variance, so stop with the pity party of how bad you have it.
I'm sure I could find more ways in which you completely misinterpret data and use faulty reasoning but it will likely fall on deaf ears. And before you add me to the "Merge Mafia" (lol wtf?), my only experience with Tyson is at the tables on Merge. You could learn a lot from him if you were more open-minded instead of being so bull-headed and thinking you are correct 100% of the time.
...and after all that de-rail...congrats Tford, sick run and keep it up.











