Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
Who agrees with this. I think for those Americans who wish to play online poker on the one and only site worth playing on IMO, pokerstars, should simply consider leaving the country. It's pretty obv the US govt doesnt really give a toss and I don't think US players will EVER be allowed back on to Pokerstars! Agree or Disagree?
AGREE -
Sadly, I think you're right.
Edited By: daughton Nov 10th, 2011 at 03:16 PM
Nobody is going to stick their neck out and promote a bill to legalise gambling on a national scale at a time of recession and austerity caused by bankers financial gambling.
It's just not going to make it onto any meaningful politicians agenda for the forseeable future.
I know you'll say poker isn't gambling (I agree - it's not) but that's not how the majority see it and that's the reality that has to be dealt with -
I am glad to be out of the country to play on pokerstars and other networks that are safe, but many people with families or have deep roots in the US will find it hard to leave. I left the US for reasons outside of poker in 2006, but am glad to be able to take advantage of it now.
I don't see US players being allowed on Pokerstars any time soon, but other networks may be allowed if a bill is ever passed or maybe Harrahs or another casino will have a site just as good. What happens here is anyone's guess at the moment though. -
I don't think pokerstars is the be all and end all of online poker. I realize that people who were primarily playing the last few years may feel that way, but prior to that it was partypoker and at times it was other sites. Back in 2006 everyone was loving paradise poker above everything because it was just so insanely soft and had those great rebuy tournaments every day. Party was the biggest, Stars was huge, Full Tilt was getting bigger. There was a big place for quite a number of sites at that time, and people's needs/desires were different than they are now. The industry changes, and just because Stars was the biggest and best in 2011 doesn't mean it always will be.
I think we're just skimming the surface at this point of what's possible in online poker, because a relatively small amount money has been spent on the entire industry up to this point. Obviously it's been quite a bit more than nothing, but the investments made have been small (particularly on US-facing poker rooms) compared to the kind of money that will be thrown at this once most or all of the big players in gaming are involved. We're already starting to see what's possible in Europe. The US will show us a lot more, though. Games will be different, player base will be different, deposit and cashout methods will be VERY different. 6 months after the US market is fully in play, no one will be talking about how they miss the old days of instant e-checks on PokerStars. You'll be able to cash money out of these sites with a debit card. Quickly no one will remember about the days of having to have a cash out recredited to their account because a processor was seized. No one will remember the threads here on the site about people wanting to know if some weird looking check was safe to cash at their bank.
EVERYONE in the US who wants to play online poker will be better off in a regulated environment. I hear complaints about everything ranging from how the government will fuck it all up to stuff like taxes, but at the end of the day you will be able to make MUCH more money playing because of the vastly expanded player base that will come. And the other hassles and anxieties will be gone, you won't have to worry week to week about terrible industry news. We'll finally be moving forward, instead of the endless stream of bad news and lateral or backward moves that have happened in the industry since 2006 -
Great post Adam.
I agree with everything Adam has to say and can't wait for the day that internet poker is regulated and operating in the U.S. Unfortunately, if something doesn't happen by the end of 2011 (which seems rather unlikely), I have a feeling regulation won't be in place until sometime in 2013. I don't foresee legislation being introduced/passing during an election year. I hope I'm wrong though. -
I do kind of disagree even about the election year thing. I would have 100% agreed in the past based on how the environment was in the industry, but I think this issue has become decidedly not controversial. There just is a ton of momentum to make it happen now and very little significant force fighting against it. I don't see the elections getting in the way. I think this thing is going to happen, and soon
And PS I hope I'm right :) Once legislation starts to pass, it's going to be quite a while before sites are live. And so the sooner the better -
I hope you're right. Even though it doesn't appear to be controversial in Congress, I'm worried that members of the House in conservative districts won't want to support any type of bill that includes online gaming simply because it can be twisted and used against them during elections. Hopefully though the prevailing arguments about generating tax revenue, protecting consumers, etc. will overcome any hesitance they have.
Originally Posted by Adam
I do kind of disagree even about the election year thing. I would have 100% agreed in the past based on how the environment was in the industry, but I think this issue has become decidedly not controversial. There just is a ton of momentum to make it happen now and very little significant force fighting against it. I don't see the elections getting in the way. I think this thing is going to happen, and soon
And PS I hope I'm right :) Once legislation starts to pass, it's going to be quite a while before sites are live. And so the sooner the better -
Thanks for your view on the subject Adam. I agree with you, however, I think it's going to be quite a while before we see any of this in reality. Like you said, even if legislation is passed, it's going to take some time before new sites are up and running.
I simply can't understand how poker is deemed as gambling. You associate gambling with playing against a house, not other players. In theory, it's not rocket science but the government seems to be making this a bigger issue than it really is.
I hope you're right though and that the US soon sees the light at the end of the poker tunnel. -
Originally Posted by ACheemz
Thanks for your view on the subject Adam. I agree with you, however, I think it's going to be quite a while before we see any of this in reality. Like you said, even if legislation is passed, it's going to take some time before new sites are up and running.
I simply can't understand how poker is deemed as gambling. You associate gambling with playing against a house, not other players. In theory, it's not rocket science but the government seems to be making this a bigger issue than it really is.
I hope you're right though and that the US soon sees the light at the end of the poker tunnel.
I hear ya, but it's associated with gambling because most people don't really see the difference. Everyone playing is risking money based on events that combine individual choices with chance. The fact that the "house" takes a cut of the pot rather than risking its money directly against the players isn't really that relevant to the general public. The fact that a small percentage of players can have a positive expectation while playing also isn't really that relevant to the general public.
The good news is that the general public overwhelmingly supports people's right to play (and to gamble in general). There just isn't a large contingent of people or organizations out there anymore who oppose legal gambling. Sure there's always Focus on Family - I had a really fun time debating a guy from there on the radio a few years back :) But the average guy on the street thinks he should be able to play if he wants to and just thinks it should be safe and trustworthy. -
I was reading this article http://www.wallstreetnewscast.com/ne.../elra2572.html and I think we're pretty close to getting there when a stock call is made revolving around a potential online poker bill. From what I've seen watching the stock market, legislation is rarely mentioned related to a stock move(either positive or negative) unless there is a real chance of that legislation being introduced in the near future(6mo-1 yr). I mean, it obviously does not mean that legislation will be introduced, or even that it will pass once introduced, but I think the momentum is strongly shifting in favor of legalization which is a huge step forward for us if we think back to April where it seemed that we had few politicians on our side.
-
well i watched c-span and it seems like we have the politicians attn more than ever with all the talk of protecting the consumer and the money it will generate is a huge double whammy for them to ignore,i also don't think that its impossible for a huge usa land based casino to make a gr8 poker site.Than we can get the influx of noobafish on the felts and make some some nice bread
Edited By: double_kyan Nov 10th, 2011 at 05:33 PM -
It's more than FoF that opposes gambling expansion. Many states are very guarded about it as well. For instance, a bill in IL that would expand gambling in a massive way was recently voted down by the House.
As long as politicians are involved in getting a deal done I think we're screwed, esp in IL, where our two most recent governors are in jail. You just aren't gonna be able to make the deal sweet enough for them to go along with it. Plus they won't wanna double cross the b&m casinos, who have lined their pockets, by welcoming in more competition.
And opposing gambling always helps boost their public image because they turn it into "hey I'm looking out for people and I care" kinda thing. "Just because we need the money doesn't mean we need to turn to solutions like this..." And that couldn't be further from the truth. Its a bottom line business for these ppl-what's in it for me and how can you advance my interests? -
Newsflash: You're wrong.
-
This whole process is worse than watching paint dry lol.
-
I'm very sick of lock poker (merge). Let's get something legit with 100,000 + people all playing again!!!! PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
That whole "We the People" thing is such a crock of shit too.
Edited By: P0KERDUUDE Nov 10th, 2011 at 06:46 PM -
Anyone who has been paying close attention to politics over the last 3 years knows just how inefficient and gridlocked the legislative process has become. The fact that we're entering an election year plays into it, but so does the fact that Republicans have vigorously obstructed compromise on all sorts of issues. Even no-brainer, uncontroversial matters have been turned into bargaining chips. Congress has the deficit supercommittee to deal with, and then after that a continuing resolution to fund the government. These are likely to intensify the gridlock.
The only glimmers of hope I can see is that Senate Majority Leader Reid is a proponent, and also that a lot of the current action has been initiated by Republicans. Provided they don't try to tack on a rider abolishing the EPA or putting Reagan on the $10 bill, I could see a lot of Dems jumping on aboard as it gains steam.
I do think it'll get passed someday, but it could take years and then further months to implement. And many states may decide not to let their residents participate. A lot of us could probably wait it out with Merge/Bodog if there was any degree of certainty with those sites, but they really are just a least worst option at this point. -
What?
Have we not been watching what is going on?
Adam was right in that Party Pooper was the biggest and the best prior to them leaving the market in 2006. stars ran to the top because of that.
Have we not been watching.....Party Pooper has formed an alliance to re-enter the US Market and I GUARANTEE they already have the site built and can launch with-in weeks of regulation being passed.
With Party coming back in they will be able to use a US based site and integrate their current users and once again retain the top spot and become party poker once again.
Legislation wont happen because its an election year.......are you really that ignorant? Poker has certainly become accepted as a "sport" or "hobby" in the US. Our political arena has changed and the need for money as well as out of the box thinking is becoming a driving force. What the heck do you think the're having all of these open meetings for?
2012 is ripe for the passing of legislation (NOT LEGALIZATION) and the opening of a site that would instantly go BOOM!
Every frigg'en American that has ever wanted to play will fire up their computer once our lovely government say's "It's OK, you can go out and play with your friends Tommy"
Don't forget....ONLINE POKER IS NOT ILLEGAL.......They don't need to legalize it....that would be a much different battle and would be a "Voting Year" issue.....(Gahhhhhhh.....donks!) -
lol...who is being ignorant here?
Originally Posted by Diver1
Legislation wont happen because its an election year.......are you really that ignorant? Poker has certainly become accepted as a "sport" or "hobby" in the US. Our political arena has changed and the need for money as well as out of the box thinking is becoming a driving force. What the heck do you think the're having all of these open meetings for?
-
I agree with a lot of things being said ITT, but mostly I agree with OP that our government doesn't care enough to do anything about it.
I don't question IF poker will be regulated in the US, i know it's just a matter of time. But the US government doesn't give enough of a shit to expedite the process. The whole mess probably could have been cleaned up within two months after black friday, as far as regulation and launching a site that's safe for US players goes.
It could and should have happened already.
Something tells me it's still going to be a while longer. I really hope i'm wrong. -
pretty sure whichever site becomes the leading US site (assuming US poker is regulated) would quickly become the leading world wide site as long as stars isnt allowed back into the market (also assuming US sites would be world wide)
wherever the mass amounts of new US online players go everyone will want to follow and it will only be software and mayb schedule that is weaker at first but this is pretty easy to get right -
I agree with this, unless the new biggest site in the US won't be allowed to accept players from outside the US which is possibly going to happen. Another possibility is that the rake is too high on US sites thus keeping Pokerstars as the top worldwide site.
Originally Posted by mcandrews3rd
pretty sure whichever site becomes the leading US site (assuming US poker is regulated) would quickly become the leading world wide site as long as stars isnt allowed back into the market (also assuming US sites would be world wide)
wherever the mass amounts of new US online players go everyone will want to follow and it will only be software and mayb schedule that is weaker at first but this is pretty easy to get right
Similar Threads
-
2 Replies
Harry Reid says online poker legislation "will get done." So what are we waiting for?
By TheEngineer in Poker Legislation
Last Post: Aug 23rd, 2011, 05:44 AM -
10 Replies
Head over to poker Legislation Give some Support OT
By Jokerluelz in Off Topic
Last Post: Jun 11th, 2009, 10:55 PM -
10 Replies
Is it TIME for me to give up online Poker?
By Reno_Jones in Bad Beats
Last Post: Apr 11th, 2008, 11:51 AM -
15 Replies
So Fxmxmemrmermxer is pacing around in the waiting room of the hospital waiting for Wowbint to give birth...
Last Post: Nov 18th, 2007, 02:46 PM - 1 Replies










