[x]

Changes to OPR for Pokerstars players

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 11
  1. McBain74 McBain74 is offline

    Canada

    Posts: 2,388
    Joined: Jan 10

    May 4th, 2012 (5/4/2012 9:56pm)

    not sure if this has been posted yet or not

    http://www.officialpokerrankings.com/psp.html
     
  2. CBorders CBorders is offline

    Posts: 58
    Joined: Apr 08

    May 4th, 2012 (5/4/2012 10:06pm) in reply to McBain74

    So if we don't opt in or opt out will our statistics be hidden still?
  3. McBain74 McBain74 is offline

    Canada

    Posts: 2,388
    Joined: Jan 10

    May 4th, 2012 (5/4/2012 10:18pm) in reply to CBorders

    not sure, I would assume you would be automatically opted out, but they are asking for 0.01$ to be hidden from opr so idk
     
    Thread Starter
  4. Sdanby Sdanby is offline

    Worcester
    United Kingdom

    Posts: 1,220
    Joined: Jan 09

    May 4th, 2012 (5/4/2012 11:25pm) in reply to McBain74

    no you are automatically opted out as of may 10th. to be seen you must opt in. basically will be useless from now on unless you just wanna keep track of your own progress
     
  5. Gotskillz Gotskillz is offline The roof is on fire!

    Kitchener
    Canada

    Posts: 2,876
    Joined: Mar 05

    May 4th, 2012 (5/4/2012 11:27pm) in reply to Sdanby

     
    Originally Posted by Sdanby View Post

    no you are automatically opted out as of may 10th. to be seen you must opt in. basically will be useless from now on unless you just wanna keep track of your own progress

    Which is easy enough to do other ways, and much more accurate. Making OPR completely useless imo
     
  6. Extinuous Extinuous is offline

    Wroclaw
    Poland

    Posts: 1
    Joined: May 12

    May 5th, 2012 (5/5/2012 12:33am) in reply to Gotskillz

    Not only OPR, Pokerprolabs has been forced to do the same. It's basically the end of public mtt stats of stars players, anywhere.
  7. norv norv is offline Norm MacDonald of photoshop

    Wellington
    New Zealand

    Posts: 2,485
    Joined: Aug 10

    May 5th, 2012 (5/5/2012 8:09am) in reply to Extinuous

    except here
     
  8. tedSTRETCH tedSTRETCH is offline

    Costa Rica

    Posts: 1,338
    Joined: Jun 10

    May 5th, 2012 (5/5/2012 9:11am) in reply to norv

    im sure sharkscope will be working for awhile
    297 
  9. theskillzdatklls theskillzdatklls is offline

    Mexico

    Posts: 37
    Joined: Sep 10

    May 6th, 2012 (5/6/2012 3:52am) in reply to tedSTRETCH

    im surprised stars has so much legal persuasion in this poker submarket honestly.
     
  10. C_Bomb C_Bomb is offline

    Croydon
    Australia

    Posts: 837
    Joined: Jun 09

    May 7th, 2012 (5/7/2012 2:42am) in reply to theskillzdatklls

     
    Originally Posted by tedSTRETCH View Post

    im sure sharkscope will be working for awhile

    Sharkscope have required you to opt in or Stars data for sat least 2 years now already

     
    Originally Posted by Gotskillz View Post

    Which is easy enough to do other ways, and much more accurate. Making OPR completely useless imo

    It will still be good for getting an idea of how much volume someone is putting in or how much experience they have if you don't have HUD. Not useless, just a different use.

     
    Originally Posted by theskillzdatklls View Post

    im surprised stars has so much legal persuasion in this poker submarket honestly.

    OPR get their feed straight from pokerstars (like P5s get the rankings info. If they don't comply with what Stars want then Stars will stop sending info. Easy game.
  11. Zenjo Zenjo is offline

    Posts: 28
    Joined: Jan 10

    May 7th, 2012 (5/7/2012 6:25am) in reply to C_Bomb

    This really sucks. I use OPR all the time for making preliminary notes on players. Information is power, and this is taking away a small edge from the players that take the time to utilise this resource.
     
Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 11