[x]
  1.  
    Originally Posted by MikeBucks View Post

    Not sure if this has been posted yet, but I thought it was pretty interesting:
    http://diamondflushpoker.com/2012/05...ker/#more-2936

    Fascinating stuff... They seem pretty shady and vindictive to me, but also shrewd and pragmatic. I really don't understand, though, how they could possibly think it fair to require people to play through gigantic requirements just to cash out existing balances on the site. That was money that belonged to people - it'd be like E-trade forcing you to make 1,000 trades before withdrawing the money you deposited. It's simply unacceptable, and his failure to acknowledge this tells me that there's a fundamental lack of understanding there about the customers' side of this situation.

     
    Originally Posted by scottypimpin1 View Post

    Very interesting, he's looking to hire the entire pocket kings/full tilt staff and still provide a payment plan ROW players that have Full Tilt funds locked up if they play on his new site....why does he need ALL of pocket fives key staff members though? And I don't know about being "best of breed in 6-7 months."

    Yeah, he's definitely overconfident about this. And I think he's wrong. I'm sure they could build some great software, since the people behind Full Tilt really did do a great job with that. But building a player base is something that takes years, not months. Full Tilt had most of the biggest names in poker endorsing them for a couple years before they really started getting big. They obviously wanted to use the player balances as leverage to get games going - basically like getting props for free. But they won't have that leverage on their new site. I think they can do well if they get all these FT people, but "best of breed" seems farfetched
     
  2.  
    Originally Posted by scottypimpin1 View Post

    Very interesting, he's looking to hire the entire pocket kings/full tilt staff and still provide a payment plan ROW players that have Full Tilt funds locked up if they play on his new site....why does he need ALL of pocket fives key staff members though? And I don't know about being "best of breed in 6-7 months."

    It's probably easier for him to hire existing staff other than scour the world for new. Very interesting article.
    I thought after all of this maybe He would try to buy UB/AP and resurrect them from the ashes which might not be such a bad business investment. It would not be that difficult to merge the 2 together and re design the software giving it a fresh start.
  3.  
    Originally Posted by CANUKEH44 View Post

    It's probably easier for him to hire existing staff other than scour the world for new. Very interesting article.
    I thought after all of this maybe He would try to buy UB/AP and resurrect them from the ashes which might not be such a bad business investment. It would not be that difficult to merge the 2 together and re design the software giving it a fresh start.

    Don't really see that happening for a number of reasons - mostly the DOJ and player balance stuff that seemed to hang them up on FTP. I think their software's not too bad, but nowhere near what FT had. It's worth something but probably not worth taking on the responsibility of paying back well into eight figures of player balances.

    Also, if Full Tilt was a disaster on the affiliate/rakeback front, then UB/AP is Chernobyl. So many absolutely brutal deals in the mix there. It's hard for me to see any way for that company to be saved.
     
  4.  
    Originally Posted by scottypimpin1 View Post

    Very interesting, he's looking to hire the entire pocket kings/full tilt staff and still provide a payment plan ROW players that have Full Tilt funds locked up if they play on his new site....why does he need ALL of pocket fives key staff members though? And I don't know about being "best of breed in 6-7 months."

    I was ready for the challenge. ;) ;)
  5. Oops lol, make that Pocket Kings. I'd sure much rather have yall involved in all their decisions rather than what their current staff did anyways!
  6.  
    Originally Posted by Adam View Post

    Fascinating stuff... They seem pretty shady and vindictive to me, but also shrewd and pragmatic. I really don't understand, though, how they could possibly think it fair to require people to play through gigantic requirements just to cash out existing balances on the site. That was money that belonged to people - it'd be like E-trade forcing you to make 1,000 trades before withdrawing the money you deposited. It's simply unacceptable, and his failure to acknowledge this tells me that there's a fundamental lack of understanding there about the customers' side of this situation.

    Agree with this, he doesnt seem to understand that many players have been very negatively affected financially by FTP, FTP was just another chance for him to make money. He keeps claiming the DOJ were the bad guys when the fact is they stood up for the players against his so called repayment plan. Its a bit insulting what he had planned and on top that he keeps throwing around that 94.9% number which is a complete misrepresentation of the truth. These statements hes making now are just showing his frustrations that he didnt get to make his money off this deal and hes whining about it to the public like were supposed to feel bad for him or something. It seems to me like he knows he blew this deal and hes just venting his frustrations by playing the victim.
  7.  
    Originally Posted by Adam View Post

    Don't really see that happening for a number of reasons - mostly the DOJ and player balance stuff that seemed to hang them up on FTP. I think their software's not too bad, but nowhere near what FT had. It's worth something but probably not worth taking on the responsibility of paying back well into eight figures of player balances.

    Also, if Full Tilt was a disaster on the affiliate/rakeback front, then UB/AP is Chernobyl. So many absolutely brutal deals in the mix there. It's hard for me to see any way for that company to be saved.


    Not sure about Ub debt to players. I know it is not as much as FTP still. If a reputable person in business was to swoop in and buy UB/AP basically for a song and dance they could re work the site and redesign it, get it up and running and then align themselves with a B&M in the US to eventually re enter the US market after it becomes legal.
    I know I said this before but I think stars is going to have a hard time re entering the US market. Even with FTP.
    A site that has been sold to a legit business would have a better chance even if the DOJ closed it down on Black Friday.
    I am sure with new ownership UB would do okay.
  8.  
    Originally Posted by scottypimpin1 View Post

    Oops lol, make that Pocket Kings. I'd sure much rather have yall involved in all their decisions rather than what their current staff did anyways!

    Yeah, I knew what you meant, was just kidding around. I am proud to work for PocketFives and all the people I work with and for are great. <3
  9. GBT dragged the deal on and on when they had the chance to close it in the exclusive period. Probably overconfident and thought they were being the only potential buyer in town. Right now the deal is off and they came back to beg those FTP employees to start another site? Kinda pathetic...
  10. So nothing from stars lately on this?
     
  11.  
    Originally Posted by MJCACE View Post

    So nothing from Stars lately on this?

    We've heard nothing from PokerStars other than a statement saying they couldn't comment:
    http://www.pocketfives.com/articles/...rumors-587336/

    We'll definitely keep everyone posted.
     
  12. Sureeeeeeee
  13. I grant you that I don't know all the "legalese" of exactly what they should, and should not be able to say, etc etc, but after Daniel Negreanu all but led a torch weilding mob to the homes of FTP heads for staying silent for so long, you can't tell me they can't simply say they're working on something, or there'll be more.

    It's so insane to me that there are so many people that are so sick of all the absolute relentless stream of rumours and ups and downs through this whole thing and not one single person anywhere can simply step up and tell us what's going on.
     
  14.  
    Originally Posted by crystal_donkey View Post

    I grant you that I don't know all the "legalese" of exactly what they should, and should not be able to say, etc etc, but after Daniel Negreanu all but led a torch weilding mob to the homes of FTP heads for staying silent for so long, you can't tell me they can't simply say they're working on something, or there'll be more.

    It's so insane to me that there are so many people that are so sick of all the absolute relentless stream of rumours and ups and downs through this whole thing and not one single person anywhere can simply step up and tell us what's going on.

    Lol welcome to the world of multi-billion dollar businesses. They can't legally talk bout this kind of stuff. Duh.
  15.  
    Originally Posted by Adam View Post

    Fascinating stuff... They seem pretty shady and vindictive to me, but also shrewd and pragmatic. I really don't understand, though, how they could possibly think it fair to require people to play through gigantic requirements just to cash out existing balances on the site. That was money that belonged to people - it'd be like E-trade forcing you to make 1,000 trades before withdrawing the money you deposited. It's simply unacceptable, and his failure to acknowledge this tells me that there's a fundamental lack of understanding there about the customers' side of this situation.



    Yeah, he's definitely overconfident about this. And I think he's wrong. I'm sure they could build some great software, since the people behind Full Tilt really did do a great job with that. But building a player base is something that takes years, not months. Full Tilt had most of the biggest names in poker endorsing them for a couple years before they really started getting big. They obviously wanted to use the player balances as leverage to get games going - basically like getting props for free. But they won't have that leverage on their new site. I think they can do well if they get all these FT people, but "best of breed" seems farfetched

    GBT puts up a new site it's going to be a long slow process to build up traffic without the US players. Unless He gets it done and up and running about the same time as legislation goes through and the US market opens up again.
  16.  
    Originally Posted by CANUKEH44 View Post

    GBT puts up a new site it's going to be a long slow process to build up traffic without the US players. Unless He gets it done and up and running about the same time as legislation goes through and the US market opens up again.

    Well GBT is stating that he will still pay back ROW players with money locked up on Full Tilt with that lame payment plan if former FT players play on his site. How he can go about doing that is beyond me, but if he can pull that off iIm sure that will help him build a customer base fairly quickly. I still feel like he's setting his goals way too high with opening up a new site. Without US market and with pokerstars dominance, i don't see a completely new company seriously competing even in the international market. I'm sure if/when his new site would open there would have to be some massive overlays in the MTTs.
  17. I never had a good cozy feeling about the deal anyway. Several of the people in our poker league have talked about it on many occasions. One even said He thought that maybe Tapie was planning to screw the players with the huge balances by dropping the doom switch on them. LOL
  18. This was talked about recently in this thread, but I also wanted to post a link to PocketFives' feature article about Groupe Bernard Tapie potentially starting its own online poker room:

    http://www.pocketfives.com/articles/...r-Site-587354/
     
  19. All the focus seems to be on Tapie's offer to key employees, but these guys all have non compete contracts so the only thing Tapie might have accomplished is getting himself sued, so he could then counter sue and try to tie pokerstars up in court until they offered him some nuisance money.

    The real story here seems to be that GBT was negotiating in bad faith all along, dragging out the process until FTP had no money left, attempting to blackmail the pro players who received loans, hoping that the DOJ would fold, or preferably he could convince Bitar to put the company into liquidation and he could pick it up the assets he needed at auction even cheaper - scrubbed clean of liabilities but with repayment commitments from the named pros.

    This appears to be one time where the 'tin foil hat' conspiracy crowd turned out to be right, and PokerStars coming to the rescue might only be the second biggest plot twist, with Ray Bitar turning out to be an accidental hero in this saga being the real shocker.
  20.  
    Originally Posted by tamiller866 View Post

    Ray Bitar turning out to be an accidental hero in this saga being the real shocker.


    NEVER!
     
  21.  
    Originally Posted by Gotskillz View Post

    NEVER!

    LOL Exactly what I was thinking.
  22. The reason Bitar won't doing anything without DOJ approval is obviously obvious.
  23. full tilt has a hearing today at 14:00 local time which i think is 12 minutes not to sure.

    http://www.pokernews.com/news/2012/0...tion-12484.htm
    Edited By: sssssssivarT May 3rd, 2012 at 02:49 PM
  24.  
    Originally Posted by sssssssivarT View Post

    full tilt has a hearing today at 14:00 local time which i think is 12 minutes not to sure.

    http://www.pokernews.com/news/2012/0...tion-12484.htm


    i think it should have started about 95 minutes ago.
     
  25.  
    Originally Posted by sssssssivarT View Post

    full tilt has a hearing today at 14:00 local time which i think is 12 minutes not to sure.

    http://www.pokernews.com/news/2012/0...tion-12484.htm

    The hearing isn't taking place. After the FTP/GBT deal fell through, Orinic withdrew its license application:
    http://www.gamblingcontrol.org/userf...l%20notice.pdf
     
  26. thanks dan, i guess i can stop holding my breath now =P
     
  27. lol honestly were probably never going to get paid, GBT was our best hope and that took almost a year to set up so even if stars does buy its probably going to be another year.
    Edited By: sssssssivarT May 3rd, 2012 at 08:21 PM
  28.  
    Originally Posted by sssssssivarT View Post

    lol honestly were probably never going to get paid, GBT was our best hope and that took almost a year to set up so even if stars does buy its probably going to be another year.

    Where do you people come up with these assumptions (besides out your asses).

    I have high hopes Pstars will come thru. Especially since they snapp jumped on the acquisition of FTP... So chances are they legit were waiting forever for gbt to fall through, and the second it did, they took it. Reason they didn't do it earlier was prolly cuz gbt had a non-intrusion negotiation safety net or something tht allowed only him to negotiate with FTP for a certain amount of time.
    I'm speculating here, but I think some FTP people and DOJ people knew Pstars was waiting, so they kept pushing it off.. And then once it was legally allowed for Pstars to interject, they did.

    Pstars came thru with $$ first time, I see no problems with them comin thru this time, especially since DOJ is prolly shit tired of us hounding our representatives and wht not, and plus they want their pay day.

    To be fair tho, I just pulled that out of my ass, but at least my ass tries to educationally guess actual circumstances and real world situations... Not just "zomgggg no money for anyone trollolol"
    Edited By: ShyGuy03533 May 3rd, 2012 at 09:43 PM
  29.  
    Originally Posted by ShyGuy03533 View Post

    Where do you people come up with these assumptions (besides out your asses).

    I have high hopes Pstars will come thru. Especially since they snapp jumped on the acquisition of FTP... So chances are they legit were waiting forever for gbt to fall through, and the second it did, they took it. Reason they didn't do it earlier was prolly cuz gbt had a non-intrusion negotiation safety net or something tht allowed only him to negotiate with FTP for a certain amount of time.
    I'm speculating here, but I think some FTP people and DOJ people knew Pstars was waiting, so they kept pushing it off.. And then once it was legally allowed for Pstars to interject, they did.

    Pstars came thru with $$ first time, I see no problems with them comin thru this time, especially since DOJ is prolly shit tired of us hounding our representatives and wht not, and plus they want their pay day.


    Winner. I believe you are BANG ON. March 16 was that intrusion safety net you spoke of.
    I see no reason to doubt that stars would come through if this offer is legit.
    It takes a while to put a deal like this together also. The lawyers have to be able to make their money too.
    Don't think it will be another year but at least 3 months. Aug or Sep.
    I guess we will find out eventually.
  30.  
    Originally Posted by CANUKEH44 View Post

    Winner. I believe you are BANG ON. March 16 was that intrusion safety net you spoke of.
    I see no reason to doubt that stars would come through if this offer is legit.
    It takes a while to put a deal like this together also. The lawyers have to be able to make their money too.
    Don't think it will be another year but at least 3 months. Aug or Sep.
    I guess we will find out eventually.

    Same. People expect results over night. Yea it's been a year, but that was with gbt. I'm expecting to hear something concrete with Pstars by end of summer, perhaps in time for wsop/end of it.

    Also could explain why gbt is very vindictive right now. Might feel slighted by DOJ and FTP