-
Nice! And I never even had to use my one time.
-
WOOO!!!
-
Originally Posted by rayspizza
Looks like US players will have to request thier money from the DOJ. Non-US will be given money directly from poker stars. Wish I was dealing with PS instead of DOJ
I wonder how much of a shitshow this will
Be. -
-
lol. I can only imagine. After I posted I felt kinda bad tho, because It should really be a time for celebration. So stoked for people who have life changing money on there eitherway. If I had a large portion of a BR, that i needed to make more $$$, tied up there; it would have been a terrible 15 months.
-
PokerStars' statement on this:
http://www.pokerstarsblog.com/corpor...oj-096492.html
Poker Players Alliance issuing a statement shortly. Still looking for the official DOJ press release. -
PocketFives' recap of the deal:
http://www.pocketfives.com/articles/...p-down-587632/
We'll be publishing additional front page feature content today as well. Of note from PokerStars:
PokerStars will not admit any wrongdoing, which seemingly opens the door for the site to reenter the U.S. market when legislation exists. To that end, PokerStars Chairman of the Board Mark Scheinberg commented in a company press release on Tuesday, "We are delighted we have been able to put this matter behind us, and also secured our ability to operate in the United States of America whenever the regulations allow." -
From what I understand everyone is off free. PS is not allowed to employ Bitar, Lederer, Furst, and one other name that I forget. Its one of those.."everyone claiming they did nothing wrong" types of deals.
-
Wonder if this is the form we'll be using...
Edited By: boneralert Jul 31st, 2012 at 05:54 PM
http://www.justice.gov/criminal/afml...-remission.pdf
edit: nvmd: looks like remission would not apply here -
Sure hope Lederer and Ferguson don't get off scott free!
-
from the DOJ AFMLS page(not sure if restoration would apply since they indicate a criminal conviction needs to have taken place first - not sure if that means convictions of those previously holding the forfeited assets or convictions of anyone involved in the criminal violations that caused the assets to be forfeited):
Edited By: boneralert Jul 31st, 2012 at 06:10 PM
What is restoration?
Restoration is used when the Attorney General, at the request of a U.S. Attorney, authorizes the use
of forfeited funds to pay restitution to the victim of a criminal offense. Forfeited funds may be
applied to the restitution order only if no other funds are available to fulfill the defendant’s
restitution obligation. The victim generally must meet the regulatory requirements for remission as
explained below.
How does restoration work?
The U.S. Attorney’s Office works with the Court to identify the victims of the crime to be included
in the criminal restitution order. Following entry of the restitution order, the U.S. Attorney requests
that AFMLS approve restoration and transfer to the court funds forfeited in the same and/or related
civil, criminal or administrative forfeiture proceedings.
What are the primary benefits of restoration?
Restoration eliminates the need for each victim to file a petition for remission, which is particularly
beneficial in large multiple-victim cases. In addition, restoration requests are generally processed
faster than petitions for remission.
Is a victim defined differently for purposes of restoration than for remission?
No. A victim under the restoration procedures must meet the same qualifications as a victim
pursuant to the remission process: a person who has suffered a pecuniary loss as a result of the
crime underlying the forfeiture or a related offence. Therefore, the restitution order must list the
same victim(s) and loss amount(s) as would have been determined through the remission process.
Who cannot qualify as a victim?
A person cannot qualify as a victim if he/she:
• Knowingly contributed to or benefited from the offense underlying the forfeiture or was
willfully blind to it, or
• Has recourse to other reasonably available assets or compensation, or
• Seeks recovery for torts or physical injuries associated with the offense but are not the basis
for the forfeiture -
DOJ press release. Lots of info in here:
http://www.justice.gov/usao/nys/pres...ettlement.html
There was also a settlement reached between the DOJ and Absolute Poker today, which is outlined at the end of the DOJ press release. Summary: "The U.S. Attorney’s office also filed a motion requesting that the Court enter a settlement agreement reached with Absolute Poker/Ultimate Bet that requires the company to forfeit all of its assets (the “Absolute Assets”) in order to fully resolve this action. The motion also requests that the Government be permitted to liquidate the Absolute Assets, with the net proceeds of that sale to be held pending the resolution of claims filed by other parties who have asserted an ownership interest in the Absolute Assets. " -
I'm speculating that it may have been worded that way so that people who owe FTP money from unfunded deposits can't withdraw their entire balances. Pure speculation on my part, but it seems likely that they would include something along those lines.
Edited By: tyson219 Jul 31st, 2012 at 05:59 PM
edit: or perhaps it was left more generic than balances since it will include FTP points, tickets, and other similar things -
thats the least they should do
-
so what exactly does this mean on the AP UB front?










