Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local

enough is enough

Reply to Thread
  1. daap25 daap25 is offline

    Jacksonville, IL
    United States

    Posts: 55
    Joined: Jul 07

    Jan 6th, 2010 (1/6/2010 9:26pm)

    Ive been at this for several years now live and online and anyone that doesn't think fulltilt is rigged is just plain and simple full of shit. I played in maybe 10 to 15 tournaments today and got jj or better 12 times and lost everytime.Most of the time we were allin and the the smaller pp would trip up on the flop.Now if this was just a bad day or whatever then it would be fine but its all that ever happens everyday every tourn. for well over 1000 tournaments now. This is not an angry statement. The money loss isn't a good thing but its part of life.There is no way these cards are random and the site is obviously rigged. I win quite a bit live and lose tons on here mostly due to suckout after suckout. I dont think its rigged agaisnt me at all. I think its rigged to induce action and then seems to reward the the one who is worst off everytime after the flop. I have studied and played all different styles so Im not new at this. There is definitly something wrong and yet another reason why this needs to be regulated. Flame all you want and tell me to get better which I have always done and will always try to do but there is no way that this even resembles the live game.I think they should change the name of the game online to Texas flushem or something of that nature. It is astouding how many flushes are chased and caught on that site. Please dont give me the crap about way more hands online because yes thats true but it still doesnt explain the amount of bad beats that happen to everyone online. I wish there was a way to see how many times the worst hand after the flop ends up winning the hand. I bet its unbelievably high.
  2. billyb1969 billyb1969 is offline

    Rochester, NY
    United States

    Posts: 290
    Joined: Jan 06

    Jan 6th, 2010 (1/6/2010 9:30pm) in reply to daap25

    I think the site sucks! Same thing happens to me as well but I am grateful for the stimuls seat I won Last May2009... I try and build a bankroll on that site but with no success.. pokerstars is the site for me.
  3. saukendar saukendar is offline

    United States

    Posts: 1,235
    Joined: Mar 07

    Jan 7th, 2010 (1/7/2010 7:31pm) in reply to daap25

    Six AA in a 6 hour session a week back - zero wins & 2 time the smaller PP made quads - NEVER hapens in live play.

    Oh - and K7o is an absolute lock - I haven't seen that hand get all-in and not make a winner in weeks.
  4. KUMD2B KUMD2B is offline

    Overland Park, KS
    United States

    Posts: 130
    Joined: Sep 09

    Jan 8th, 2010 (1/8/2010 5:49pm) in reply to daap25

     
    Originally Posted by daap25 View Post

    Ive been at this for several years now live and online and anyone that doesn't think fulltilt is rigged is just plain and simple full of shit. I played in maybe 10 to 15 tournaments today and got jj or better 12 times and lost everytime.Most of the time we were allin and the the smaller pp would trip up on the flop.Now if this was just a bad day or whatever then it would be fine but its all that ever happens everyday every tourn. for well over 1000 tournaments now. This is not an angry statement. The money loss isn't a good thing but its part of life.There is no way these cards are random and the site is obviously rigged. I win quite a bit live and lose tons on here mostly due to suckout after suckout. I dont think its rigged agaisnt me at all. I think its rigged to induce action and then seems to reward the the one who is worst off everytime after the flop. I have studied and played all different styles so Im not new at this. There is definitly something wrong and yet another reason why this needs to be regulated. Flame all you want and tell me to get better which I have always done and will always try to do but there is no way that this even resembles the live game.I think they should change the name of the game online to Texas flushem or something of that nature. It is astouding how many flushes are chased and caught on that site. Please dont give me the crap about way more hands online because yes thats true but it still doesnt explain the amount of bad beats that happen to everyone online. I wish there was a way to see how many times the worst hand after the flop ends up winning the hand. I bet its unbelievably high.

    gg logic
  5. strut_nut strut_nut is offline

    Lebanon, KY
    United States

    Posts: 256
    Joined: Oct 05

    Jan 9th, 2010 (1/9/2010 7:56am) in reply to daap25

     
    Originally Posted by daap25 View Post

    Ive been at this for several years now live and online and anyone that doesn't think fulltilt is rigged is just plain and simple full of shit. I played in maybe 10 to 15 tournaments today and got jj or better 12 times and lost everytime.Most of the time we were allin and the the smaller pp would trip up on the flop.Now if this was just a bad day or whatever then it would be fine but its all that ever happens everyday every tourn. for well over 1000 tournaments now. This is not an angry statement. The money loss isn't a good thing but its part of life.There is no way these cards are random and the site is obviously rigged. I win quite a bit live and lose tons on here mostly due to suckout after suckout. I dont think its rigged agaisnt me at all. I think its rigged to induce action and then seems to reward the the one who is worst off everytime after the flop. I have studied and played all different styles so Im not new at this. There is definitly something wrong and yet another reason why this needs to be regulated. Flame all you want and tell me to get better which I have always done and will always try to do but there is no way that this even resembles the live game.I think they should change the name of the game online to Texas flushem or something of that nature. It is astouding how many flushes are chased and caught on that site. Please dont give me the crap about way more hands online because yes thats true but it still doesnt explain the amount of bad beats that happen to everyone online. I wish there was a way to see how many times the worst hand after the flop ends up winning the hand. I bet its unbelievably high.

    I used to be suspicious of their cash games, but I always thought their tourneys were legit. Their support is horrid, I can tell you that much.
  6. Zarrr Zarrr is offline

    Posts: 4
    Joined: Jan 10

    Jan 9th, 2010 (1/9/2010 10:31am) in reply to strut_nut

    I don't think that Daap is talking nonsense. I've had similar experiences. I'm getting really sick of it. I'm ashamed of all the money I lost (I was duped out of).
    I have revisited my hands and found nothing really fundamentally wrong. So much sick "bad luck". So many trips outkickered, so many runner runner flushes my opponents get, so many preflop (substantially) raised pocket aces getting beat up by 65s 9Ts straights etc etc. Bad play gets paid off time after time.

    I do feel that tourneys are by far more honest than the cashtables.

    There should be an INDEPENDENT authority that monitors the software.
  7. YOMAXX YOMAXX is offline

    Brooklyn, NY
    United States

    Posts: 1,010
    Joined: Oct 07

    Jan 9th, 2010 (1/9/2010 10:22pm) in reply to Zarrr

     
    Originally Posted by Zarrr View Post

    I don't think that Daap is talking nonsense. I've had similar experiences. I'm getting really sick of it. I'm ashamed of all the money I lost (I was duped out of).
    I have revisited my hands and found nothing really fundamentally wrong. So much sick "bad luck". So many trips outkickered, so many runner runner flushes my opponents get, so many preflop (substantially) raised pocket aces getting beat up by 65s 9Ts straights etc etc. Bad play gets paid off time after time.

    I do feel that tourneys are by far more honest than the cashtables.

    There should be an INDEPENDENT authority that monitors the software.

  8. Zarrr Zarrr is offline

    Posts: 4
    Joined: Jan 10

    Jan 10th, 2010 (1/10/2010 1:40pm) in reply to YOMAXX

    Very funny! I hope you aren't the independent autority! :D BTW Which planet are both from? And secondly, can the cat sew you for doing this to him/her?
  9. AMEC04 AMEC04 is offline

    NC
    United States

    Posts: 286
    Joined: Feb 09

    Jan 10th, 2010 (1/10/2010 6:47pm) in reply to Zarrr

    I agree with everything said here, online poker is obviously rigged.

    And I WIN at online poker. I have a 50% ROI over 2660 MTTs on OPR. I have a sharkfin next to my name in many SNG catagories.

    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
  10. Zarrr Zarrr is offline

    Posts: 4
    Joined: Jan 10

    Jan 13th, 2010 (1/13/2010 10:20am) in reply to AMEC04

    I've been playing HU SNG's 1-2-5 usd for a few weeks and it has a WHOLE different feel. Sure I get a bad beat once in a while but nothing like at the cashtables. It feels like my skills really do count here. I wonder if it's only the cashtables that they rig.

    Forgive the pun, but there is definitely something fishy about the cashtables, too many sick and costly coincidences. I'm nothing like AMEC but I've ended in the bubble in lots of tourneys but yet at the cashtables good runs ALWAYS end in sick downswings and don't tell me it's because I play really badly. I win most of the sessions I play at the cashtables, but when I lose a session they really drag me down (against bad players who try their all in luck with awfull potodd 1-5 outers and magically hit it on the river).

    I hope to hear more of your experiences ...
Reply to Thread