LOL

If he knows all the flaws and how to exploit them, then why isn't he in the top 10 himself???

why is this in bad beats?

I read the whole thing and still cant find where he revealed any flaws.

Just to get everyone started and you can start seeing it is it has to do with your position in the pot whether or not someone has limped behind you or if your are the first to enter the pot. I am completely aware of the stubborn non-believers that are going to come with this. But let me tell you something... don't bash it until I start revealing some information... then we will see who is laughing... I will not come out completely until someone steps up and admits that some of the top players know these flaws.

 

Originally Posted by Carmoooch

Just to get everyone started and you can start seeing it is it has to do with your position in the pot whether or not someone has limped behind you or if your are the first to enter the pot. I am completely aware of the stubborn non-believers that are going to come with this. But let me tell you something... don't bash it until I start revealing some information... then we will see who is laughing... I will not come out completely until someone steps up and admits that some of the top players know these flaws.

lol...oh and how old are you?

first of all i cant just provide the information for nothing i need a reason to give it out. What people dont realize is I have information that is very valuable theres no free lunch here. Like I said I just started playing for real and Im not in experimentation any more. I will be exploiting the flaws but what is tough about it is i know certain situations these situations can help you survive a tournament when you really need to win. I have many hands that it works with and theres so many combinations and things that can happen. If anyone sees any patterns too feel free to share.

Here's one for you...3100 in plb points and he SNAPS my call...bigger stacks ftw at the beginning of mtts. I think this happens until a certain point in mtts, where shorties start to double up.

pokerstars Game #18611193721: Tournament #93747272, $150+$12 Hold'em No Limit - Level III (25/50) - 2008/07/05 - 21:33:19 (ET)
Table '93747272 77' 9-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: Dantès13 (2675 in chips)
Seat 2: delegator (4035 in chips)
Seat 3: AcePlays (3820 in chips)
Seat 4: nsemog77 (2575 in chips)
Seat 5: F_H_E_S (2805 in chips)
Seat 6: Hot & Ready (3085 in chips)
Seat 7: björni (1765 in chips)
Seat 8: bef99hwk (3240 in chips)
Seat 9: finsfan7 (5480 in chips)
delegator: posts small blind 25
AcePlays: posts big blind 50
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to bef99hwk [Ah Kc]
nsemog77: folds
F_H_E_S: folds
Hot & Ready: folds
björni: calls 50
bef99hwk: calls 50
finsfan7: calls 50
Dantès13: folds
delegator: raises 500 to 550
AcePlays: folds
björni: folds
bef99hwk: raises 2690 to 3240 and is all-in
finsfan7: folds
delegator: calls 2690
*** FLOP *** [Th 4c Jd]
*** TURN *** [Th 4c Jd] [8s]
bef99hwk said, "not hitting that"
bef99hwk said, "gg"
*** RIVER *** [Th 4c Jd 8s] [Ts]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
delegator: shows [2s 2c] (two pair, Tens and Deuces)
bef99hwk: shows [Ah Kc] (a pair of Tens)
delegator collected 6630 from pot
jhepp is connected
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 6630 | Rake 0
Board [Th 4c Jd 8s Ts]
Seat 1: Dantès13 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: delegator (small blind) showed [2s 2c] and won (6630) with two pair, Tens and Deuces
Seat 3: AcePlays (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: nsemog77 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: F_H_E_S folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: Hot & Ready folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: björni folded before Flop
Seat 8: bef99hwk showed [Ah Kc] and lost with a pair of Tens
Seat 9: finsfan7 folded before Flop

I'll back you a little...

Transcript for your last 1 games requested by Carmoooch (ctufano9@yahoo.com)
*********** # 1 **************
pokerstars Game #18648451371: Tournament #94810520, $6.00+$0.50 Hold'em No Limit - Level II (15/30) - 2008/07/07 - 12:52:10 (ET)
Table '94810520 1' 6-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: xaver3 (1390 in chips)
Seat 2: muchostylez (1345 in chips)
Seat 3: Carmoooch (1405 in chips)
Seat 4: Tommy Rusk (1730 in chips)
Seat 5: stefannix (1395 in chips)
Seat 6: Fietseties (1735 in chips)
Carmoooch: posts small blind 15
Tommy Rusk: posts big blind 30
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Carmoooch [Ac Ks]
stefannix: folds
Fietseties: raises 60 to 90
xaver3: folds
muchostylez: folds
Carmoooch: raises 60 to 150
Tommy Rusk: folds
Fietseties: calls 60
*** FLOP *** [Ts Ad Kc]
Carmoooch: bets 1255 and is all-in
Fietseties: calls 1255
*** TURN *** [Ts Ad Kc] [Kd]
*** RIVER *** [Ts Ad Kc Kd] [Jd]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Carmoooch: shows [Ac Ks] (a full house, Kings full of Aces)
Fietseties: shows [Td Qd] (a Royal Flush)
Fietseties collected 2840 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 2840 | Rake 0
Board [Ts Ad Kc Kd Jd]
Seat 1: xaver3 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: muchostylez (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: Carmoooch (small blind) showed [Ac Ks] and lost with a full house, Kings full of Aces
Seat 4: Tommy Rusk (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: stefannix folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: Fietseties showed [Td Qd] and won (2840) with a Royal Flush

Now you tell me that there is absolutely nothing wrong with the dealing software.... here is a clue to prove to everyone a little flaw that I did.

Chip stack plays a very large role in this flaw on stars. He opened the pot with a raise and he is also the biggest chip stack in position. As long as he is in position on the flop he will win the hand. I was trying to give everyone a taste of that by showing how no matter if i had a better hand than him and i tried reraising him preflop his hand is always good.

LOLZ definitely not true...that QT is prolly shipping everything but an all in. I had a guy limp 88, call a raise and reraise pre for 1/5th his stack...def not folding QT to a raise.

is op being results oriented?

Can you give us percentages? Like happens EVERY time, 90%, etc...cuz it doesn't ALWAYS happen.

I highly doubt honors at hofstra given your sentence structure and seemingly overall lack of intelligence.