Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. OK let me start by saying I have never thought a site or poker was or is rigged against one player or another. I am leaning in that direction now. After having very few options as to where to play online poker after BF I chose to seek out a backing deal in order to be able to still grind online. Having my $$$ tied up on tilt hasn't allowed me to play live as much as i want. So for the past 4 months ive been grinding on merge and i am OK with losing as this is a big part of POKER, however it seems like its a 180 degree turn from the game i loved and once knew from stars or FTP. Now obv there should be minor adjustments made when playing on a new site to get a feel for the software and new players. I find myself now losing everyday in spots where i know im playing good if not great poker. I am not just talking about flips and losing them, i can somewhat avoid these spots by improving post flop play and thats what ive been doing. But im now losing every flip i enter as well as 2 n 3 outers seem to be norm. Ive long said to myself and others play good worry never. I have gone through the ups and downs of online poker for over 3 years now and feel like im in a rut i cant get out of now not sure if its me or something else. Maybe im overreacting to a bad run of cards but i feel like im better than alot of the people that win on merge and im playing the same aggro style that you need to play to win mtts. I feel like i cant win now , not a mtt but a fucking hand!!!! Im looking for thoughts on how you guys feel about the software and board runouts.

    My thoughts are : I feel like im playing with a 72 card deck, the people that made this software couldnt have had a clue about poker cause the #s dont add up, if it were really %5 then i wouldnt waste my time pissing and moaning about losing to it but its happening everyday allday. my point here is if im 90% plus then i have a lot more winners in the deck then the 2 or 3 outer that falls way to often. The worst hand flops a huge draw or a pair a very high % of the time and i feel like this shouldnt be the case as often as it is. OBV shits gonna happen im just saying it happens way to often. The way they double up the short stacks that have 5 BBs or less by dealing them AA is a gross display off whats wrong with this software in my opinion as this is not SOP and very rarely happens in real poker.

    my thoughts on the people that are winning on merge are what makes these guys so good just on merge cause a lot of them never won shit on the other sites.
    how can these people be so (GOOD) but only on merge. Im not trying to offend these people at all im just trying to figure out how you guys win playing the same way i am but your winning and im losing. Now i am completely reserved to the fact that im an aggro maniac and this may have alot to do with the swings that i go through. However i have been a proven consistent winner in this game for 3 plus years now and i know that i can continue to win.

    Please feel free to discuss more. would like to hear how some of you regs feel about what ive brought up.
    Edited By: bustyou79 Jan 6th, 2012 at 04:36 AM
     
  2. well tedstretched is fucking murdering merge, but a lot of people, myself included, are pretty much of the same opinion you are. maybe we can keep this out of BB by getting some discussion going on a couple points.

    -What other Americans are crushing Merge?

    -How would you compare Merge with Cereus? I would say they have close to the same number of players, but the similarities stop there. Merge has better pros (Moorman? vs. Mouth/Cunt), and more un-caught superusers and collusion, much better players, and Cereus had better everything else...
  3. i play ps and merge and see heaps of crap chit on merge, hate merge
  4. i had AK on two tables at the same time, then flopped two pair with both, and lost both hands.

    now the odds of having AK at two tables isn't that crazy, and the odds of flopping two pair with each of them is something that will happen if you play long enough, but when you factor in the fact that both lost (on the flop), that's some pretty long odds.
  5.  
    Originally Posted by gjallen1975 View Post

    i had AK on two tables at the same time, then flopped two pair with both, and lost both hands.

    now the odds of having AK at two tables isn't that crazy, and the odds of flopping two pair with each of them is something that will happen if you play long enough, but when you factor in the fact that both lost (on the flop), that's some pretty long odds.

    amazing post right here

    for cereal tho, merge isnt bad at all. decent software, decent mtts, def worth playing
  6. You beat me to this post OP.. I feel your pain
     
  7. wow ya'll are weird.

    merge is cool.

    I'm not a hardcore online grinder, never been. But I'm a winner at stars until they stopped letting me play. And I'm on Hero and without making a deposit or having a major freeroll win I'm sitting on a $450 roll atm.

    When you finally stop thinking there are forces at work to make you lose, you will allow yourself the mindset needed to win. I've taken brutal suck outs in merge tourneys and still go on to take them down. Stop this crap conspiracy thinking and grind harder.
  8.  
    Originally Posted by unemployable View Post

    wow ya'll are weird.

    merge is cool.

    I'm not a hardcore online grinder, never been. But I'm a winner at stars until they stopped letting me play. And I'm on Hero and without making a deposit or having a major freeroll win I'm sitting on a $450 roll atm.

    When you finally stop thinking there are forces at work to make you lose, you will allow yourself the mindset needed to win. I've taken brutal suck outs in merge tourneys and still go on to take them down. Stop this crap conspiracy thinking and grind harder.

    Thankyou for your post but youve cashed in a grand total of 5 mtts on merge i cant take what your saying for any kind of value
     
    Thread Starter
  9. How big is your sample over this "long" period of time?
    I would argue that the average skill level of the players has also increased since BF. So, tougher competition mixed with variance will only result in longer and greater downswings.
  10. Merge is a tougher site now because all the good US players that got booted from stars and FTP play MTT's on Merge now... The fields aren't big but they're stacked with talent... meaning less leakage.... meaning less stack size and 1 bad or UL play and you're out!!! We need to get back on the WORLD Wide Web, over all weaker players with bigger fields = mo money$!
     
  11. there are a ton of things that they need to fix but its the best option we have atm, as for being rigged it has been confirmed by kavilla that the site is without a doubt rigged and littered w superusers
     
  12.  
    Originally Posted by Iplaythabored View Post

    there are a ton of things that they need to fix but its the best option we have atm, as for being rigged it has been confirmed by kavilla that the site is without a doubt rigged and littered w superusers


    lmao that dude cries about crying
     1
  13. kavilla lol what a skitzo
  14.  
    Originally Posted by NINYIM View Post

    Merge is a tougher site now because all the good US players that got booted from stars and FTP play MTT's on Merge now... The fields aren't big but they're stacked with talent... meaning less leakage.... meaning less stack size and 1 bad or UL play and you're out!!! We need to get back on the WORLD Wide Web, over all weaker players with bigger fields = mo money$!


    nah
  15. MErge has a decent schedule but the software is horrible compared to Full Tilt and Poker stars. The regs on Merge also play the short stack a lot different with 20<bb. The structures on Merge are also horrible compared to FTP and Stars.
     
  16. Normally I would not comment on this subject.... but here is my experience and you can make your own judgment. I used to play tons on Cereus and I did see a lot of fishy things happen. Every time I would see a player hit multiple miracles I would look them up and they had consistently played less than 100 games. It got to the point where I could predict which players at the table I would lose against and which I would run normal against based merely on # of games played. Now I realize correlation does not mean causation but its just an observation. Eventually I developed a roll that allowed me to play at a high enough buyin level where everyone in the games were experienced.... the math began to change drastically and I ran well (or true).

    I have noticed similar things on Merge. Started out fine then I had an unbelievably awful run (primarily against new players). Guys calling off on flop and turn with 2 and 3 outs getting there consistently, flopping sets deep in mtts and losing to top pair that goes runner runner higher boat etc. So I finally switched skins and within the first 12 games hit 3 final tables and mincashed a few others... up 100+ buyins.

    I noticed a lot of new players joining Merge in the past 8 weeks or so.... the same time period that my downfall began. I have also looked up many other Merge regs who play the $20-$100 games and many of them have also experienced relatively extended downswings during this period.

    Just my observations fwiw, it could all be in my head, and probably is. IMO none of us have played enough games on Merge to make a statistically significant conclusion, but I support anyone who wants to attempt this.

    edit: I have been accused of being a Merge bot by Kavilla, who is clearly world-class.
    Edited By: donkiman Jan 6th, 2012 at 09:04 AM
     
  17. Yo look up player WILLYB911 on official poker rankings, you will see dreams come true on THE MERGE. Dude took 3rd in a free roll for$20 played the $11 sati to high roller won ticket, then shipped the high roller... Then last weekend some other dude ships 100k, he has a total of 4 MTT's played on merge.
    Edited By: NINYIM Jan 6th, 2012 at 02:34 PM
     
  18.  
    Originally Posted by donkiman View Post

    Normally I would not comment on this subject.... but here is my experience and you can make your own judgment. I used to play tons on Cereus and I did see a lot of fishy things happen. Every time I would see a player hit multiple miracles I would look them up and they had consistently played less than 100 games. It got to the point where I could predict which players at the table I would lose against and which I would run normal against based merely on # of games played. Now I realize correlation does not mean causation but its just an observation. Eventually I developed a roll that allowed me to play at a high enough buyin level where everyone in the games were experienced.... the math began to change drastically and I ran well (or true).

    I have noticed similar things on Merge. Started out fine then I had an unbelievably awful run (primarily against new players). Guys calling off on flop and turn with 2 and 3 outs getting there consistently, flopping sets deep in mtts and losing to top pair that goes runner runner higher boat etc. So I finally switched skins and within the first 12 games hit 3 final tables and mincashed a few others... up 100+ buyins.

    I noticed a lot of new players joining Merge in the past 8 weeks or so.... the same time period that my downfall began. I have also looked up many other Merge regs who play the $20-$100 games and many of them have also experienced relatively extended downswings during this period.

    Just my observations fwiw, it could all be in my head, and probably is. IMO none of us have played enough games on Merge to make a statistically significant conclusion, but I support anyone who wants to attempt this.

    edit: I have been accused of being a Merge bot by Kavilla, who is clearly world-class.




    lol yah tht joker called me a proven cheater..................during a huge downswing[lol] i went too live didnt feel like making a 2nd deposit, plus i need money NOW [u know what i mean]
     1
  19.  
    Originally Posted by donkiman View Post

    Normally I would not comment on this subject.... but here is my experience and you can make your own judgment. I used to play tons on Cereus and I did see a lot of fishy things happen. Every time I would see a player hit multiple miracles I would look them up and they had consistently played less than 100 games. It got to the point where I could predict which players at the table I would lose against and which I would run normal against based merely on # of games played. Now I realize correlation does not mean causation but its just an observation. Eventually I developed a roll that allowed me to play at a high enough buyin level where everyone in the games were experienced.... the math began to change drastically and I ran well (or true).

    I have noticed similar things on Merge. Started out fine then I had an unbelievably awful run (primarily against new players). Guys calling off on flop and turn with 2 and 3 outs getting there consistently, flopping sets deep in mtts and losing to top pair that goes runner runner higher boat etc. So I finally switched skins and within the first 12 games hit 3 final tables and mincashed a few others... up 100+ buyins.

    I noticed a lot of new players joining Merge in the past 8 weeks or so.... the same time period that my downfall began. I have also looked up many other Merge regs who play the $20-$100 games and many of them have also experienced relatively extended downswings during this period.

    Just my observations fwiw, it could all be in my head, and probably is. IMO none of us have played enough games on Merge to make a statistically significant conclusion, but I support anyone who wants to attempt this.

    edit: I have been accused of being a Merge bot by Kavilla, who is clearly world-class.

    yea same here. and he thinks all p5er's cheat/collude
  20.  
    Originally Posted by bustyou79 View Post

    OK let me start by saying I have never thought a site or poker was or is rigged against one player or another. I am leaning in that direction now. After having very few options as to where to play online poker after BF I chose to seek out a backing deal in order to be able to still grind online. Having my $$$ tied up on tilt hasn't allowed me to play live as much as i want. So for the past 4 months ive been grinding on merge and i am OK with losing as this is a big part of POKER, however it seems like its a 180 degree turn from the game i loved and once knew from stars or FTP. Now obv there should be minor adjustments made when playing on a new site to get a feel for the software and new players. I find myself now losing everyday in spots where i know im playing good if not great poker. I am not just talking about flips and losing them, i can somewhat avoid these spots by improving post flop play and thats what ive been doing. But im now losing every flip i enter as well as 2 n 3 outers seem to be norm. Ive long said to myself and others play good worry never. I have gone through the ups and downs of online poker for over 3 years now and feel like im in a rut i cant get out of now not sure if its me or something else. Maybe im overreacting to a bad run of cards but i feel like im better than alot of the people that win on merge and im playing the same aggro style that you need to play to win mtts. I feel like i cant win now , not a mtt but a fucking hand!!!! Im looking for thoughts on how you guys feel about the software and board runouts.

    My thoughts are : I feel like im playing with a 72 card deck, the people that made this software couldnt have had a clue about poker cause the #s dont add up, if it were really %5 then i wouldnt waste my time pissing and moaning about losing to it but its happening everyday allday. my point here is if im 90% plus then i have a lot more winners in the deck then the 2 or 3 outer that falls way to often. The worst hand flops a huge draw or a pair a very high % of the time and i feel like this shouldnt be the case as often as it is. OBV shits gonna happen im just saying it happens way to often. The way they double up the short stacks that have 5 BBs or less by dealing them AA is a gross display off whats wrong with this software in my opinion as this is not SOP and very rarely happens in real poker.

    my thoughts on the people that are winning on merge are what makes these guys so good just on merge cause a lot of them never won shit on the other sites.
    how can these people be so (GOOD) but only on merge. Im not trying to offend these people at all im just trying to figure out how you guys win playing the same way i am but your winning and im losing. Now i am completely reserved to the fact that im an aggro maniac and this may have alot to do with the swings that i go through. However i have been a proven consistent winner in this game for 3 plus years now and i know that i can continue to win.

    Please feel free to discuss more. would like to hear how some of you regs feel about what ive brought up.

    This, x's 1000...... love getting it in as 93-95% fav and get rivered with 2-3 outer for all your chips. Makes me feel alot better knowing i'm not the only person who runs like a three legged turtle tied to a tree.
  21. I went from not thinking merge is rigged, too thinking merge is rigged, then I had a reality check.. A bunch of my friends were home on break these past couple of weeks and we played poker probably about 10 times. None of them are very good, they don't win online, and their logic of the game is atrocious. But anyways these atrocious players really got the best of me, I mean they fucking owned me in so many pots... So now when I think about merge being rigged I disagree, I just really really need to reevaluate my game and thought processes. To my credit, since black friday I have had periods where I dont play poker for weeks or months, which before black friday was never the case for 2 years strait. Poker is a game where you need to constantly improve your game or you will fall behind... Maybe some of you guys are going through something like that and blaming it on the rng.

    I am not trying to disrespect any of yall, for all I know you guys could be right, but I would say practice harder and realize you guys arent the only ones experiencing a downswing. (I havnt had a winning month in 3-4 months, tbh I don't even dare too look up the exact stats.) Just keep grinding, play well, and you will eventually be laughing at these thoughts you have...

    also keep in mind that the structure on merge is very different, so in spots where you would 3b shove a 20bb stack on someone on ps or ftp, may not be is good.. Not because its rigged, but because the structure is different.. just try to find a way to adjust.

    gl at the tables all
     
  22.  
    Originally Posted by kevmode View Post

    MErge has a decent schedule but the software is horrible compared to Full Tilt and Poker stars. The regs on Merge also play the short stack a lot different with 20<bb. The structures on Merge are also horrible compared to FTP and Stars.

    i see top 20 players flatting from sb n bb all day w like 12bbs or less like... o rly...mostly JiJi haha and others i can't think of cuz im stoned atm...
    Edited By: cocoa_butter111 Jan 18th, 2012 at 09:44 PM
     
  23. I just find it weird how you sighn up at a new site and you can bet your ass you run like god for the first couple of weeks. Then you build your self up a nice little roll, then you cashout. You might as well just hit the doom switch yourself because everytime I cashout, it is months of running just horrible. I mean, I like to try to think it is just variance but when you play one day and you have an big pair vs underpair and you win 0 of 13 times as an 83% fav preflop and lose all for a showdown percentage of 0% there is something wrong. I do agree when this happens, the tilt factor comes into play and you do play less than optimal but when you can't get it allin preflop with aces and beat 55 all day long something just isn't right. The best days are when you run kk into aa all day long to. Maybe I am just one of the unluckiest people alive. I really don't have any idea why I still play lol.
  24. thats the case for me, on pokerstars
  25. shits obv not legit... 80/20s run like 20/80s... 70/30s run like 30/70s... runnerrunners r the norm... the newer the player the better they run... its like site wants you to run good for your first cpl huundred games to hook you in and then lets the mayhem ensue...
    Edited By: cocoa_butter111 Jan 30th, 2012 at 07:41 PM