[x]Register Now
Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
Alright, so here it is. I have been playing against and watching a player over the last week. The player in question has a SILVER STAR status on sharkscope. I have seen him play all week in multiple tournaments.
I have seen him go all in 73 times. Out of these 48 of them were more or less coin flips ranging from 45/55 to almost 50/50. Of these he has won every single one of the coin tosses. As well as the 25 others in which he was either favorite or an underdog.
Isn't this odd ? -
very odd that you are stalking a player and counting how many times he goes all in.
What I find odd is he went all in 73 times and saw a flop every time -
The player who doesn't lose has many different screen names, but he tends to get his money in vs me all day Sunday with 2 or 3 outs...
-
Who the hell watches someone play that much in a week? Can't help but question the accuracy of your observations. Fwiw theres plenty of players with silver stars who are completely legit just from the ftp 90 mans alone that I know so that doesn't mean anything.
-
is this really true though? who's the player?
-
"The player who doesn't lose" sounds like an ode to the donks who get lucky.
-
-
lol. Stalk much? Post the name already. Or stop posting altogether. That's good too.
-
The odds of winning 48 coinflips in a row is... (1/2)^48, right? That's like one in three quadrillion. This could be the guy that stars uses to tax me as a winning player. Post his name immediately
-
this is some paranoid shit right here. imagine if it is actually true and OP is lying dead at his CPU now?
-
I'm still here. I want to check this out some more before posting his screen name. I find this really strange but want no trouble. I might write directly to the poker site in question if needed.
-
doesn't*
-
no, the OP says of the 73 all-ins, 48 were flips, of which he won every single one. Therefore, one could assume that the 25 all-ins lead to his exiting from the tourneys he was playing in, either directly or indirectly by reducing his chip stack so that he lost an all-in at a later stage
-
What's odd is that you spent all this time & effort to track this guy, then
when you found this incredible anomaly, you did absolutely nothing to prove
it or state a valid case for your findings on this forum. Not even a single
hand history, screenshot, etc. No concrete evidence, at all.
Now THAT'S odd
Similar Threads
- 1 Replies
-
2 Replies
Going to lose our abilty to look up player stats ...
By BlakeInIndy in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Aug 9th, 2009, 07:32 PM -
20 Replies
For every successful player, how many lose?
By rustypolano in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Mar 27th, 2008, 11:27 AM -
11 Replies
Octavian_C doenst miss a live final table?
By JasonGray in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Jan 21st, 2008, 03:37 PM - 4 Replies











