Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. Alright, so here it is. I have been playing against and watching a player over the last week. The player in question has a SILVER STAR status on sharkscope. I have seen him play all week in multiple tournaments.

    I have seen him go all in 73 times. Out of these 48 of them were more or less coin flips ranging from 45/55 to almost 50/50. Of these he has won every single one of the coin tosses. As well as the 25 others in which he was either favorite or an underdog.

    Isn't this odd ?
  2. very odd that you are stalking a player and counting how many times he goes all in.

    What I find odd is he went all in 73 times and saw a flop every time
  3. The player who doesn't lose has many different screen names, but he tends to get his money in vs me all day Sunday with 2 or 3 outs...
  4. Who the hell watches someone play that much in a week? Can't help but question the accuracy of your observations. Fwiw theres plenty of players with silver stars who are completely legit just from the ftp 90 mans alone that I know so that doesn't mean anything.
     
  5.  
    Originally Posted by zander View Post

    The player who doesn't lose has many different screen names, but he tends to get his money in vs me all day Sunday with 2 or 3 outs...

    QFT
  6.  
    Originally Posted by zander View Post

    The player who doesn't lose has many different screen names, but he tends to get his money in vs me all day Sunday with 2 or 3 outs...

    wp
     
  7. is this really true though? who's the player?
  8. "The player who doesn't lose" sounds like an ode to the donks who get lucky.
  9. Post the name please. Maybe someone will go and take a look at his actual hands statistics.
     
  10.  
    Originally Posted by SpankyHamm View Post

    Post the name please. Maybe someone will go and take a look at his actual hands statistics.

  11.  
    Originally Posted by supra1988t View Post

     
    Originally Posted by SpankyHamm View Post

    <STRIKE>Post the name please. Maybe someone will go and take a look at his actual hands statistics</STRIKE>.

    why the f has the name not been posted yet.
  12. lol. Stalk much? Post the name already. Or stop posting altogether. That's good too.
  13. so he won every tourny he has played all week? he must be a boss!
     
  14. The odds of winning 48 coinflips in a row is... (1/2)^48, right? That's like one in three quadrillion. This could be the guy that stars uses to tax me as a winning player. Post his name immediately
  15. this is some paranoid shit right here. imagine if it is actually true and OP is lying dead at his CPU now?
  16. I'm still here. I want to check this out some more before posting his screen name. I find this really strange but want no trouble. I might write directly to the poker site in question if needed.
    Thread Starter
  17. what does it mean if you lose 73 times in a row?
     
  18. Dammit...........and I just put my tin foil hat in the cleaners.
     
  19. If this guy has won all 73 of his all ins then he must have also won every MTT he has played. No?
     
  20.  
    Originally Posted by Gosselinator View Post

    I'm still here. I want to check this out some more before posting his screen name. I find this really strange but want no trouble. I might write directly to the poker site in question if needed.

    This guy is a sandwich short of a picnic basket.
     
  21.  
    Originally Posted by ucfchamp View Post

    This guy is a sandwich short of a picnic basket.

    Yogi Bear? U play poker?
  22. doesn't*
  23.  
    Originally Posted by jinglenutz View Post

    what does it mean if you lose 73 times in a row?

    It means you're Z-Fresh
  24.  
    Originally Posted by CJDeman View Post

    If this guy has won all 73 of his all ins then he must have also won every MTT he has played. No?

    no, the OP says of the 73 all-ins, 48 were flips, of which he won every single one. Therefore, one could assume that the 25 all-ins lead to his exiting from the tourneys he was playing in, either directly or indirectly by reducing his chip stack so that he lost an all-in at a later stage
  25.  
    Originally Posted by Gosselinator View Post


    Isn't this odd ?

    What's odd is that you spent all this time & effort to track this guy, then
    when you found this incredible anomaly, you did absolutely nothing to prove
    it or state a valid case for your findings on this forum. Not even a single
    hand history, screenshot, etc. No concrete evidence, at all.

    Now THAT'S odd
  26.  
    Originally Posted by Gosselinator View Post

    I'm still here. I want to check this out some more before posting his screen name. I find this really strange but want no trouble. I might write directly to the poker site in question if needed.

    ^ Modern day inspector gadget.

Similar Threads