[x]Register Now
Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
<span>I saw this post today and I couldn't help but feel that this guy is making a whole lot of sense. I'm a programmer too. I've always suspected it was rigged.
CLIFF NOTES:
</span>
<span>-I AM NOT SAYING POKER IS RIGGED, I'M SAYING TO READ THIS AND DISCUSS</span>
<span>AND TO NOT HAVE A CLOSED MIND EITHER WAY - saying you think it's not rigged and that
we are dumb IS NOT A VALID ARGUMENT - keep it to yourself plz
-THIS GUY'S STORY IS PROBABLY NOT TRUE - DOESN'T MATTER read the SUBSTANCE of his ARGUMENT and tell me if that doesn't resonate with your PERSONAL EXPERIENCES
-I AM A PROGRAMMER this can VERY EASILY BE DONE
-If you post, if you can, mention how long you've been playing.
-</span><span>The only proof we have against it NOT being rigged, is that someone saved all their hand histories, after 10,000 hands or whatever, we all get the same amount of straights, flushes, etc.</span>
<span>For some people this is proof its not rigged.
</span><span>However, what they don't realize is, this doesn't account for HOW those hands are dealt out.</span>
A smart programming team can satisfy the above condition, and still rig it in exactly the way
this guy has described below.
<span>Before you post anything in this thread, you have to read this ENTIRE MESSAGE</span>
<span>otherwise, you're a freakin douche and gfto and all that.
Similarly, please don't post "I got 2 outered on the river, its rigged" there's a bad beat
forum for that.
</span>
<span>If you want to flame me, make sure it's funny, or again, you're a douche.
</span><span>HERE IS WHERE I FOUND THE ARTICLE/POST</span>
<span>http://www.cardschat.com/f13/online-...igation-70058/
scroll down about 2/3 of the page
</span>
"I can end the arguement for all the knuckleheads guessing"
<hr size="1">Iknow a programmer who helped create the Poker stars shuffle.Accordingto him it is rigged as its a necessary evil from a business standpoint.Though not rigged for a specific individual the hands are rigged in anumber of ways.First and foremost,80% of players on poker stars are badpoker players,the kind that call big bets on low percentage hands,orwill even raise themselves on a bad hand.If it fell according to normalpercentages the poker sharks would drain such players and drain themreal quick.If a bad player was contstantly losing his butt he would getfrustrated and not come back.If the 80% of bad players all left,so goes80% of the sites profits with them.By rigging it to dish alot of badriver beats it gives bad players who should have folded out a more evenplaying field with the sharks who would have taken all their cash.Itsnot just about bad beats either.Your chip count matters especially intournies.In a tourney if you have the highest stack in the hand beingplayed its programmed for the come from behind beats on 4th or river70% of the time if the higher calls the lows all in.You'll see ithappen constantly a hand where a lower chips goes all in preflop withpocket aces and a high stacks calls with like a 4 and 5 off suit.Flopdishes a 3rd ace with king and ten,last two cards 2 and 3 to give it tothe higher chip caller with the ace to 5 straight.By rigging it thisway it puts the odds with higher chips regardless of who had thepercentages to win but keeps it so in the long run all the low chipcallers do get some hits to block the arguement its rigged.Thats thekey is to rig it at a certain percentage this way a trend don't happenall the time,the low chips can still hit the high chip at 30% to quellany arguement that its plain out rigged for the high chip (whichtechnically it is if its going to give it to him 70% of the timeregardless of what high chips came in with).You'll also notice if youpay attention that the first 4 cards flopped are often two of twodifferent suits to leave flush possibilities for multiple hands goinginto the river,and often these also have a straight draw potential intheir to keep the max amount in the hand betting big.Many times thatfinal river card in these situations will dish a flush but with a cardthat also gave another caller his straight.Its by design this is not acoincidence.The program is alot more complicated then people evenrealize.
The endorsements of this site are paid for endorsements with thecompanies taking poker stars at their word of how the shuffleworks,these companies didn't pay any programmer to comb through theprogram and actually see how the shuffle happens in reality. I asked theexact same question to him as people here ask,why would they riskrigging it if where people could figure it out and stop playingthere.He said "Simply put,the general masses are really stupid and arewilling to trust any business unless there is clear cut proof ofrigging.As long as the low chips don't get bad beat every single handthey all in they can't claim its always rigged for high chips,as longas bad river fish don't win on the river everytime people can't say therivers are rigged so thats why you rig it at a certain percentage soits not really able to be proven cause anyone can win the hand even ifthe percentages are fixed based on chip count and table action asopposed to the percentages based on the cards.He even told me of a timethe program hit a glitch and all tournies for the day had to be shutdown while they figured out what happened with the program.In dealingits usual drama hands to keep table action high in a tourney,theprogram miscalculated and threw a 5th ace.I actually looked it up onsearch engines to see if anyone ever spoke of this and found a screenshot of the tourney he was talking about http:/wtfpokerstars.ytmnd.com.They had to fine tune the program to make sure it didn't misread whatsleft in the deck again but the rigged drama flops remain in play,thatspart was never altered.I asked him how they could get away with it ifthey were caught red handed,explanation "Well if people who saw it wantan explanation its simple,tell them it was a hacker who compromised theshuffle and make the guy who got the five aces sign up with a newscreen name and inform him if he talks about what happened in gamerooms,specifically mentioning that the 5th ace came from poker starsend and not from some program he was using,he would be banned".
So to sum it up they rig the site cause they know they can and its notjust to make a few bucks,over the course of a year the way itsprogrammed it generates them multi millions more in profits and itsdone in a way that can look questionable too many but can never reallybe proven.They bank on the majority trusting them unless actualpositive proof can be shown its rigged (which it never can be unless ahacker got into their program and actually spelled it out for usexactly how the shuffle is working).If you read message boards all overthe web you will see they made the right gamble cause the majority ofpeople stick up for them and say "its not rigged,that would be stupidwhat could they gain from that?" The answer is they gain alot from thatand by keeping it rigged specifically by a certain percentage to givethe bad rivers and such,its kept so that the sharks can't take all thebad players money but at the same time the sharks will still get theirown share of wins to keep everyone happy (or so they theorized).I playthere myself,just the free money for fun and to watch to see if thetrends he spoke of is true and the way the flops happen with alot ofriver beats,and specifically alot of higher chips players gettingbailed out of low percentage hands on the river and it is veryconsistent with the system he explained to me.So you can all debateabout if its rigged or not.I will go with the words of an actualcreator of the shuffle.He had to sign a secrecy form on how the shuffleworks so that the prgrammers can't speak publicly and compromise thesites integrity.I on the other hand am just a friend of his and signednothing,just relaying what i heard to keep players informed and savethem from having their money stolen from them *winks* -
I once asked the question if the software could be manipulated in some way to keep cash on the site longer. I was only replied to with "why would they do that". The answer is to keep money on the site longer and in the hands of bad players longer, as the article maintains.
I don't know how they would program this but I have yet to hear anyone explain how it would be impossible to do so. -
im not saying it is, or it isn't
I'm saying let's discuss
i'm saying you're an idiot for not reading it after i said explicitly to read it.
you bring no value to this thread
read it, or shutup -
I'm a programmer
it's not hard to do
it can be done
this guy makes a very, very good point -
well there is obviously a massive incentive for sites like pokerstars to keep the fish coming back and paying rake.
There is also a way for the program to be non-random to keep the fish player while still appearing to be random when a stastical analysis is performed on a large sample of results.
Whether or not companies like PokerStars actually engage in such practices is still uncertain. However, there is certainly a MOTIVE for them to do so. -
Actually it WOULD be hard to do. Oh, and you shouldnt agree with yourself under the same name, it looks bad.
Now the question is, with all the effort you put into that post to try and give stars a bad name, did you just go busto or did you get paid to try and chase people away? -
if i was to attempt to read that smaller paragraphs would be a good start.)
-
^ and the doomswitch is turned on when you do withdraw
-
Correct me if Im wrong but isnt this the same ole rigged poker theory? You just changed it up by trying to add a little more credibility with the opening line..."my friend is a programmer who actually programmed the poker stars shuffle"
Online poker is rigged in the same way that life is rigged, few winners tons of losers -
My theory is chip recycling.... fish put money on, shark takes, shark takes bad beat b/c of lucky river for a fish, new shark takes fish money and so on and so forth... this way sharks continue to win and some fish will have a nice pay day only to put it back in and lose it.
-
to jarandjar:
it wasn't me that said that, it was someone else
Did you actually read the whole thing? -
I've always been one to defend the online sites and always denied the "rigged" motive. I've always defended the sites by saying, loose online play/wrong decisions will of course lead to some nasty beats. With donks playing ATC, bad beats are inevitable, when some clown can't let go of bottom pair, yes your big PP will get cracked 20% of the time, the problem is it seems like it's more than 20% of the time. I should sit down one day with all my HHs and actually look at this.
We see more hands so we see more action online, another reason for complaining about bad beats.
But let's not forget that we're dealing with artificial (computer) technology here and any time computers are used, anything can be controled or the contrary be too perfect. Maybe as one of my buddy's say, "it's not rigged but the random generator is 'too' perfect" as opposed to a dealer shuffling/that human intervention which is actually "not" perfect. Maybe the RHG is toooooo perfect.
My only problem with the OP is the fact that he brings up the "5th" Ace, which we've all seen and know is photoshopped. So he loses some credibility there.
I live in Montreal where our govenment run Casino just recently (mid January) finally opened a Poker Room, the only problem is that for the time being all the tables are e-tables, there is not a single dealer. I have only been there 3 times (for a couple of hourse each time) and have already witnessed 4 quads (one was me flopping quad 3s in position..lol).
Anyway you hear the same stories about the e-tables, "rigged". Again probably not rigged but there's got to be something about playing on a computerized table where a human is not shuffling.
I just know so many decent winning players that will not play online because of the technology involved. They don't claim it's rigged, it's just the techonolgy and I can understand that. -
-
its not about stars
its about any site
its not about me going busto (I did ok with poker, but i quit
to focus on other things, now i just play a few donk tournyes here and there)
its not about anything other than the argument presented in my post
nobody has anything to say against it
the truth is nobody knows either way
people who say its not rigged have no proof (the 10000 hand thing proves nothing)
people who say its rigged have no proof either
but that post brings up some interesting points
everyone always says why would sites do it, and nobody had an answer to that
until now
i've been playing for 3 years, empirically, in my opinion, what he says rings too true
I was just hoping some people had some intelligent things to say on the matter.
as for it being hard
HOW WOULD YOU KNOW
are you a programmer?
Plz reply and prove your'e not talking completely out of your ass -
until you have something intelligent to say on the matter, RE: all the points this thread brings up, please, gfto and don't come back
-
edit: multipost due to slow ass server
-
Online is rigged. I know it is. I dont care what anyone says. You cant prove me wrong. I have thousands of tourneys. Hundreds of thousands of hands.. Why hasnt one time ever that I play a tourney and NOT see a bad beat.. I mean by law of averages yes you will take a bad beat.. Then on the flip side you should at least one time in your life play a tourney where there is no bad beat.. And there isnt one. There has never been one online and there never will be online..
Other things.. How come Poker stars refuses to send me stats on my All In Race situations? Ive emailed them hundred times and they wont send it to me? And this is even better.. Why is it that I have on more than 4 occasions received the email in my box about what place I finish in the tourney a full 3 seconds before the cards all come out? These are all facts my friends.. I challenge Stars to post my All In Race Stats in my life right here in this tread.. Do it and then tell me how I win 20% of them.. .. And lose every single one of them on FT Bubbles..
10000 hands at .10/.25.. I won one hand at showdown where I had the worst hand.. One Hand.. Yes I lost over 50 when I had the best hand. This is also a fact.
This is the only reason I only play micros and dont put alot of money online.. I can play with anyone. Because the whole industry is rigged and Im only willing to risk small amount for my entertainment. -
edit: multipost due to slow ass server
-
edit: multipost due to slow ass server
-
jokerroom.com is rigged.
-
f pfives, get a new server
-
.
-
wolf
if you weren't my buddy I'd tell you to quit posting singular bad beat hands
but you did go on a HORRIBLE run this week
same pattern happened to me for 3 years... win win win. LOSE LOSE LOSE LOSE LOSE
to these kinds of ridiculous beats
took me three years to stop and go "hmm... maybe it's not me after all"
that's what this thread is about.
LET'S FIND OUT THE TRUTH PEOPLE -
Don't forget about the action flops meant to generate rake in cash games and to stimulate action in order to end S & G's as quickly as possible.
With regard to the S & G's, somtimes it's so obvious you just have to sit back and laugh. -
so each and every site is in cahoots on this? because if not, youd figure good players would note through their pt stats that for some reason or another theyre doing much better on site x than site y. and just play at x more. theyd talk to their buddies who would tell them the same thing.
that doesnt happen... stop acting like the burden of proof is on the people who arent idiots. it's on you.
idiot.
Similar Threads
- 5 Replies
- 1 Replies
-
21 Replies
Westtexasman (Shawn Rice) now has Party rigged and UB rigged!
By brsavage in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Aug 21st, 2006, 07:13 PM -
2 Replies
Poker Stars is rigged,FU lee jones and your rigged generator
Last Post: Jul 29th, 2006, 11:45 AM - 0 Replies










