Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. pokerstars Game #2707285430: Tournament #13273238, Hold'em No Limit - Match Round I, Level I (10/20) - 2005/10/02 - 00:43:41 (ET)
    Table '13273238 1' One on One Seat #1 is the button
    Seat 1: WillRomaine (1800 in chips)
    Seat 2: vanfan16 (1200 in chips)
    WillRomaine: posts small blind 10
    vanfan16: posts big blind 20
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to WillRomaine [Ah As]
    WillRomaine: calls 10
    vanfan16: raises 20 to 40
    WillRomaine: raises 40 to 80
    vanfan16: calls 40
    *** FLOP *** [Td Qd 6h]
    vanfan16: checks
    WillRomaine: bets 200
    vanfan16: raises 200 to 400
    WillRomaine: raises 400 to 800
    vanfan16: calls 400
    *** TURN *** [Td Qd 6h] [5d]
    vanfan16: bets 460
    WillRomaine: raises 660 to 1120 and is all-in
    vanfan16: calls calls 60 and is all-in
    *** RIVER *** [Td Qd 6h 5d] [Jd]
    *** SHOW DOWN ***
    vanfan16: shows [Kd 6d] (a flush, King high)
    WillRomaine: shows [Ah As] (a pair of Aces)
    vanfan16 collected 2400 from pot
    *** SUMMARY ***
    Total pot 2400 | Rake 0
    Board [Td Qd 6h 5d Jd]
    Seat 1: WillRomaine (button) (small blind) showed [Ah As] and lost with a pair of Aces
    Seat 2: vanfan16 (big blind) showed [Kd 6d] and won (2400) with a flush, King high

    PokerStars Game #2707291808: Tournament #13273238, Hold'em No Limit - Match Round I, Level I (10/20) - 2005/10/02 - 00:44:33 (ET)
    Table '13273238 1' One on One Seat #2 is the button
    Seat 1: WillRomaine (600 in chips)
    Seat 2: vanfan16 (2400 in chips)
    vanfan16: posts small blind 10
    WillRomaine: posts big blind 20
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to WillRomaine [Kh Kd]
    vanfan16: folds
    WillRomaine collected 20 from pot
    WillRomaine: shows [Kh Kd] (a pair of Kings)
    *** SUMMARY ***
    Total pot 20 | Rake 0
    Seat 1: WillRomaine (big blind) collected (20)
    Seat 2: vanfan16 (button) (small blind) folded before Flop
     
  2. FUCK HEADS UP GAMES
    EVERYONE IS SO FUCKING RETARDED
    pokerstars Game #2707353743: Tournament #13273812, Hold'em No Limit - Match Round I, Level I (10/20) - 2005/10/02 - 00:53:05 (ET)
    Table '13273812 1' One on One Seat #2 is the button
    Seat 1: WillRomaine (1520 in chips)
    Seat 2: GarageGame (1480 in chips)
    GarageGame: posts small blind 10
    WillRomaine: posts big blind 20
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to WillRomaine [Qc Kc]
    GarageGame: raises 40 to 60
    WillRomaine: raises 60 to 120
    GarageGame: calls 60
    *** FLOP *** [Qs 9d 8s]
    WillRomaine: checks
    GarageGame: bets 1360 and is all-in
    WillRomaine: calls 1360
    *** TURN *** [Qs 9d 8s] [Kd]
    *** RIVER *** [Qs 9d 8s Kd] [7s]
    *** SHOW DOWN ***
    WillRomaine: shows [Qc Kc] (two pair, Kings and Queens)
    GarageGame: shows [Js 4s] (a flush, Queen high)
    GarageGame collected 2960 from pot
    *** SUMMARY ***
    Total pot 2960 | Rake 0
    Board [Qs 9d 8s Kd 7s]
    Seat 1: WillRomaine (big blind) showed [Qc Kc] and lost with two pair, Kings and Queens
    Seat 2: GarageGame (button) (small blind) showed [Js 4s] and won (2960) with a flush, Queen high
     
    Thread Starter
  3. That's not a suckout. He had K6s, a decent holding heads up. He sees the flop for 4 bets at which point his pair w/ a draw makes the hand 50/50. He improves on the turn and just has to wait for you to push your stack in.

    Would you really have played the hand any differently? I know I wouldn't have. Even if he could see your cards he could have played the hand the same way.
  4. You retarded hoss?
    He but in 80% of his stack (or about 40 bets since you're doing it that way) on the flop with BOTTOM pair and a flush DRAW. And if you always call 4 bets preflop heads up with k6 suited I hope you'll come play some heads up matches with me. Furthermore, he pushed his own stack in minus 60 chips so that shit about waiting for me to push my stack in is just inaccurate... maybe you should actually read the hand history before commenting.....................
     
    Thread Starter
  5. "<span>He but in 80% of his stack (or about </span>40 bets<span> since you're doing it that way) on the flop with BOTTOM pair and a flush DRAW</span>."

    You mean when he was a favorite to win the hand? You're right, such a bad idea investing chips at a time like that.

    ...retarded indeed.

    "<span>Furthermore, he pushed his own stack in minus 60 chips so that shit about waiting for me to push my stack in is just inaccurate</span>."

    Yah, <span>after</span> he made his flush, "hoss." Which one of us needs to reread the hand history again? It would have been easy enough for him to put you on an overpair, and that flop gives him the edge he needs. Granted, he didn't wait for you, but nonetheless played the hand very well against you.

    Not that you should have played it any differently yourself, mind you, but you've certainly got no room to criticize him for this play. Sorry.