Originally Posted by ohiogary

Alabama would have to be high off of bath salts for them to lose this game.

Would you offer 25-1 that they aren't on bath salts Saturday?

 

Originally Posted by kellykip

I know its a serious longshot, but wanted to see if anyone had any idea of what fair odds should be on it.

50-1

 

Originally Posted by Tread

Yeah, this is complete non-sense. The only reason Stanford was even in the game is because ND inexcusably had 5 fumbles and lost 3, including the one that was returned for TD. Also not sure what the hell you are talking about Stanford moving the ball until their RB went out, Taylor played the entire game, had 28 carries, and was the back carrying the ball on all those attempts where they were stopped. You clearly were not watching this game at all.

This Stanford offensive performance was right in line with Washington and San Jose St where they failed to get 300 yards in all 3 of these games. Yet somehow, some computer has them rated 20th in the nation in "offensive efficiency" despite them being in the 90s in yardage and 80s in scoring offense. "Efficient" indeed.

Anyone looking to use this performance to prop up NDs defense need only look at how Washington stopped Stanford and how they couldn't do a thing to stop an LSU offense that has looked terrible in SEC play. And that San Jose St held them under 300 yards as well. Under that light, stopping Stanford does not look to be a big deal at all and hardly something that would score points as "elite".

I can only imagine how much your life sucks.

Yeah, I hear ya - nobody is gonna offer it for real tho. hey, +6 turnover margin, 2 ints for TD, and we could easily be within 14 in the closing minutes

 

Originally Posted by JRoth15

lol figured so

shits n gigs

http://www.masseyratings.com/game.ph...181623&t1=5749


Alabama-Notre Dame
Actual Score0-0
Most Likely24-7
Median26-7
Mean26.69-8.85
Win Probability91%-9%

 

Originally Posted by kellykip

Would you offer 25-1 that they aren't on bath salts Saturday?

Um no. However, being realistic i do believe Tennessee will score on Alabama. How much is the question? I don't see them scoring enough.

 

Originally Posted by zeppelinzoso16

My illegitimate children will be turning 3 soon. I'd hate to hear they grew up unemployed

Human trafficking is pretty cheap out my way, they can sleep on my balcony under the aircon. I got you, sir...

handle = beat

Bama
LSU
USC
UF
UGA

They all beat Notre Dame. Fuck i knew when ND made it back in the top 10 all these dolts would come out thinking they are all of a sudden world beaters.

I want to see more out of UGA before I'm willing to say they'd definitively beat ND. I'm not encouraged by the fact that UGA has faced one competent defense this year and they got absolutely stonewalled in that game. The Florida game in a couple weeks will be interesting.

 

Originally Posted by Randers

I can only imagine how much your life sucks.

One of your weaker efforts. Can't shoot holes in the message, so shoot holes in the messenger. You'd do well in politics.

 

Originally Posted by JRoth15

IF the NC game somehow ends up being ND/'Bama...and IF the ND homers bet it into single digits...I would honestly consider putting my mortgage on it.

lol i would suggest you put something of greater value on this no brainer.

however........this game would mean nd is unbeaten and has found some serious answers in moving the ball.

I was more "uhhhh"'ing the word handle...def don't think ND is more than a 3-5 pt dog on a neutral field to any of those teams.


I agree tho, having kowboy arguing the same side I am greatly lessens my argument

look...I respect what Notre Dame is doing this year and all. But it's the first time in like over a decade they have really mattered at this point in a season. Yeah, they've beaten a couple Big 10(lol) teams and a decent Stanford team but they don't all of a sudden get my huge respect for that.

Hey, if they keep winning they will get their shot.......

On the same level, what the hell has UGA or USC done in recent years, other than be over-hyped every year and lose multiple games in the SEC?

So they're better because of their affiliation with Alabama and LSU? Are you trying to imply if they didn't have to play LSU or Alabama they would have been competing for national titles? Okay. You keep telling yourself that as a way to deal with Georgia being consistently one of the biggest disappointments in college football every year.