Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
I think we can all agree it's not a matter of if but when we will get hit again. So, with that in mind, let's hear the possible ways we'll get it. I'll start it off by saying a bio-weapon attack.
P.S. I think we get attacked regardless of who is President. -
I think the banhammer and youll be the first casualty of such an attack.
Seriously gtfo with talking about another attack as crippling as 9/11 was. We will prevent it and take all measures to never let it happen again. -
GFY. You're a deluded idiot if you think we never get hit again. Do I want another 9/11? Hell no! But it's inevitable. We have to be right 100% of the time, they only have to be right ONCE!
-
Dont you mean Delusional? gg vocab. And how am I DELUSIONAL? Cause Im saying that our country/gov't/special forces will do anything possible to make sure that something that drastic never happens again?
-
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/deluded
Originally Posted by Bawsten
Dont you mean Delusional? gg vocab. And how am I DELUSIONAL? Cause Im saying that our country/gov't/special forces will do anything possible to make sure that something that drastic never happens again?
Try the link, idiot. GG YOUR vocab. Also, you're naive to think we can be right 100% of time. -
Umm isn't Wage just repeating what Joe Biden said?
-
Bawsten just leave this thread, you are doing it all wrong.
i think if we see a similar attack in our lifetime it will be of similar nature, meaning it wont be carried out using sophisticated weapons. Living out in Cali I am more worried about not if but when the next quake will hit...and of course we know there is no preventing those.
edit: now if the terrorists were sophisticated enough to cause a quake then we are fucked. I think i just came up with a far reaching plot for some suspense novel author. If you write this book bfactor send royalties to edub on stars -
actually your wrong. deluded can not be used as an adjective. delusional is correct. for proof go here http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A39951552
Originally Posted by wagewar
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/deludedOriginally Posted by Bawsten
Dont you mean Delusional? gg vocab. And how am I DELUSIONAL? Cause Im saying that our country/gov't/special forces will do anything possible to make sure that something that drastic never happens again?
Try the link, idiot. GG YOUR vocab. Also, you're naive to think we can be right 100% of time. -
You're a fucking idiot.
-
I lost 3 family members in 9/11 so its a really sore subject for me still. It makes me mad when people who live in this country basically just say its going to happen, hands down we wont prevent it. After something like that of that magnitude our govt is going to do everything possible to prevent anything remotely like that and take every single hint of something 100% serious unlike in the past.
Originally Posted by Edub
Bawsten just leave this thread, you are doing it all wrong.
i think if we see a similar attack in our lifetime it will be of similar nature, meaning it wont be carried out using sophisticated weapons. Living out in Cali I am more worried about not if but when the next quake will hit...and of course we know there is no preventing those.
But I do agree with you that it would be 100% un conventional and that you should be more afraid of a big quake then that.
I actually watched somethign on the history channel about the next big quake not too long ago i think. Kinda scary imo. -
alright, I stand corrected. YOU'RE right.
Originally Posted by curiousgeorge
actually your wrong. deluded can not be used as an adjective. delusional is correct. for proof go here http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A39951552Originally Posted by wagewar
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/deludedOriginally Posted by Bawsten
Dont you mean Delusional? gg vocab. And how am I DELUSIONAL? Cause Im saying that our country/gov't/special forces will do anything possible to make sure that something that drastic never happens again?
Try the link, idiot. GG YOUR vocab. Also, you're naive to think we can be right 100% of time. -
touche sir
Originally Posted by wagewar
alright, I stand corrected. YOU'RE right.Originally Posted by curiousgeorge
actually your wrong. deluded can not be used as an adjective. delusional is correct. for proof go here http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A39951552Originally Posted by wagewar
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/deludedOriginally Posted by Bawsten
Dont you mean Delusional? gg vocab. And how am I DELUSIONAL? Cause Im saying that our country/gov't/special forces will do anything possible to make sure that something that drastic never happens again?
Try the link, idiot. GG YOUR vocab. Also, you're naive to think we can be right 100% of time. -
Well, I'm sorry for your loss but if really looked at how inept our government is about our port security and borders, you would see it is a harsh reality. People don't want to hear the truth but it's still the truth.
Originally Posted by Bawsten
I lost 3 family members in 9/11 so its a really sore subject for me still. It makes me mad when people who live in this country basically just say its going to happen, hands down we wont prevent it. After something like that of that magnitude our govt is going to do everything possible to prevent anything remotely like that and take every single hint of something 100% serious unlike in the past.Originally Posted by Edub
Bawsten just leave this thread, you are doing it all wrong.
i think if we see a similar attack in our lifetime it will be of similar nature, meaning it wont be carried out using sophisticated weapons. Living out in Cali I am more worried about not if but when the next quake will hit...and of course we know there is no preventing those.
But I do agree with you that it would be 100% un conventional and that you should be more afraid of a big quake then that.
I actually watched somethign on the history channel about the next big quake not too long ago i think. Kinda scary imo. -
sorry for your losses Bawsten. It's always better to be prepared and expecting it will keep us prepared.
-
Speaking of 9/11, the cable repair dude is supposed to be here between 8:00 and 11:00 AM, and I'm afraid if he's not here by, like, 8:30 I'm gonna slit my f'n wrists. But I didnt want to start a thread and act like a drama queen, so I thought I'd post it here. Any advice you can give me that won't eventually force me to wind up at dictionary.com?
-
Get a satellite dish.
Originally Posted by kcd0g
Speaking of 9/11, the cable repair dude is supposed to be here between 8:00 and 11:00 AM, and I'm afraid if he's not here by, like, 8:30 I'm gonna slit my f'n wrists. But I didnt want to start a thread and act like a drama queen, so I thought I'd post it here. Any advice you can give me that won't eventually force me to wind up at dictionary.com?
-
im deluded. is that used right?
Originally Posted by curiousgeorge
actually your wrong. deluded can not be used as an adjective. delusional is correct. for proof go here http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A39951552Originally Posted by wagewar
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/deludedOriginally Posted by Bawsten
Dont you mean Delusional? gg vocab. And how am I DELUSIONAL? Cause Im saying that our country/gov't/special forces will do anything possible to make sure that something that drastic never happens again?
Try the link, idiot. GG YOUR vocab. Also, you're naive to think we can be right 100% of time. -
How deep of a hole do you have to dig in the sand to get your whole head in it?










