[x]

99 years in prison for this?!?!?

Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 31 2 3
  1. Pghfan987 Pghfan987 is online now

    Tijuana
    Mexico

    Posts: 11,793
    Joined: May 08

    Oct 14th, 2012 (10/14/2012 2:33am) in reply to norcaljeff

    She's a 7 with a BAC of .19.
     1
  2. toddm902 toddm902 is offline

    Madison, WI
    United States

    Posts: 786
    Joined: Jan 08

    Oct 14th, 2012 (10/14/2012 2:47am) in reply to Dyzalot

    I totally agree with this! I mean sometimes my kids and wife just piss me off. If I got really mad and beat the crap out of them it is just because I live with them and they did something to really make me mad. In no way would i be a threat to society. I should just get probation and not be allowed to see them anymore. That seems fair. I am not a threat to anyone else just my wife when I don't get my way.

     
    Originally Posted by Dyzalot View Post

    I haven't determined anything I suppose. However, I think it is likely that parents who commit crimes like this against their own children while living with them are not likely to commit them against strangers.

  3. chs3rd chs3rd is offline

    United States

    Posts: 875
    Joined: Nov 09

    Oct 14th, 2012 (10/14/2012 3:15am) in reply to toddm902

  4. GrenadierB GrenadierB is offline

    New Buffalo, MI
    United States

    Posts: 1,914
    Joined: May 08

    Oct 14th, 2012 (10/14/2012 3:19am) in reply to toddm902

     
    Originally Posted by toddm902 View Post

    I totally agree with this! I mean sometimes my kids and wife just piss me off. If I got really mad and beat the crap out of them it is just because I live with them and they did something to really make me mad. In no way would i be a threat to society. I should just get probation and not be allowed to see them anymore. That seems fair. I am not a threat to anyone else just my wife when I don't get my way.

  5. The Spewtard The Spewtard is offline

    Australia

    Posts: 1,589
    Joined: Oct 07

    Oct 14th, 2012 (10/14/2012 3:58am) in reply to Pghfan987

     
    Originally Posted by Pghfan987 View Post

    I bet two-year-old kids have died from less abuse than what this poor kid faced. There shouldn't be a huge disparity in the punishment if the kid had died vs. being beaten to the brink of death. That's being results-oriented. Maybe you go from 20 years to life in prison, and you certainly don't go from probation to the death penalty.

    Heaps of crimes are results-oriented tho. eg you get into a bar fight, both of you live, you go home and nothing happens. If one of you falls on his head and dies, the other does time. I agree that this bitch should rot though.
    700 2
  6. SmokeyCasinos SmokeyCasinos is offline

    CA
    United States

    Posts: 11,324
    Joined: Mar 06

    Oct 14th, 2012 (10/14/2012 4:02am) in reply to toddm902

     
    Originally Posted by toddm902 View Post

    I totally agree with this! I mean sometimes my kids and wife just piss me off. If I got really mad and beat the crap out of them it is just because I live with them and they did something to really make me mad. In no way would i be a threat to society. I should just get probation and not be allowed to see them anymore. That seems fair. I am not a threat to anyone else just my wife when I don't get my way.

  7. Pghfan987 Pghfan987 is online now

    Tijuana
    Mexico

    Posts: 11,793
    Joined: May 08

    Oct 14th, 2012 (10/14/2012 4:41am) in reply to The Spewtard

     
    Originally Posted by The Spewtard View Post

    Heaps of crimes are results-oriented tho. eg you get into a bar fight, both of you live, you go home and nothing happens. If one of you falls on his head and dies, the other does time. I agree that this bitch should rot though.

    I know, and I'm saying that's illogical.
     1
  8. snaggs snaggs is offline

    Lancaster, PA
    United States

    Posts: 5,214
    Joined: Dec 06

    Oct 14th, 2012 (10/14/2012 7:26am) in reply to Pghfan987

    so dyz if the parent of a single child kills that child but has never shown any indication of violence against anyone else, they just walk right?
     
  9. RyJS RyJS is offline

    Mexico

    Posts: 1,137
    Joined: Oct 07

    Oct 14th, 2012 (10/14/2012 8:29am) in reply to snaggs

    Some of the shit in this topic is absolutely retarded.

    Somone as unhinged as this lady apparently is, is only a danger to her family? Sorry. I'm pretty sure the the length to which she went to abuse her own child doesn't have a positive connotation with what she would or wouldn't do to someone else. It's disturbing and fucked up. A tendency to resort to violence is a tendency to resort to violence. If you want to create an accurate psycological profile based on what she did, you could say she's prone to violence over whom she has control over, and that doesn't have to be just her own children. And it certainly doesn't mean she isn't a threat to the general public.
     
  10. voorh33s voorh33s is offline

    Sarasota, FL
    United States

    Posts: 5,160
    Joined: Jun 08

    Oct 14th, 2012 (10/14/2012 10:29am) in reply to RyJS

  11. AMARTIN1181 AMARTIN1181 is offline Is not a girl

    West Hartford, CT
    United States

    Posts: 18,775
    Joined: Nov 08

    Oct 14th, 2012 (10/14/2012 2:04pm) in reply to Dyzalot

     
    Originally Posted by Dyzalot View Post

    I haven't determined anything I suppose. However, I think it is likely that parents who commit crimes like this against their own children while living with them are not likely to commit them against strangers. I have never really heard of anyone that started on their own children like this and then moved on to other people. I'm sure there are examples, however the fact that reports of child abuse are pervasive while reports of those who have committed child abuse also abusing other people seems rare would seem to support my assumption here. On the flip side, I would not consider Sandusky a danger to children in his own family. It seems that there is a large psychological difference between harming those in your family and those who are not. I could be wrong but this is the perception I have gained over my lifetime.

    Also note that I was going off assumptions that this was her only history of violence. We were discussing this in the context of making sure she had no further contact with her children. If she has been proven to be a danger to the public at large than more severe measures would need to be taken than what I proscribed.


    hahahaa this is retarded even by dyzalot standards. Stop smokin them rocks
    676 
Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 31 2 3