[x]Register Now
Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
Let me preface this by saying I am in NO WAY making light of the deaths of American service men and women in Iraq and Afghanistan. I just think maybe a little perspective is in order.
Some numbers to remember:
In WW1 the US lost approx. 53,402 soldiers
In WW2 the US lost approx. 291,557 soldiers
In Korea the US lost approx. 36,568 soldiers
In Vietnam the US lost approx. 58,199 soldiers
In the Gulf War the US lost approx. 529 soldiers
In Afghanistan the US has lost approx. 491 soldiers
In Iraq the US has lost approx. 4020 soldiers
(the above numbers are the "low" etimates from WW2 - Vietnam)
Cliff Notes:
All wars suck
This one sucks a lot less than most of the others in our history -
I'm pretty sure that argument is centered around fighting a pointless war and not the body count. When you're fighting a war for shits and giggles losing 1 soldier is way too much.
-
agrii 100%
-
I'm fairly certain the majority of the people who are actually doing the fighting, and the military leaders that are ordering the young people to risk their lives would disagree that this is a pointless war.
-
In WW1 the US lost approx. 53,402 soldiers
Germany expands aggressively tries to take over Europe
In WW2 the US lost approx. 291,557 soldiers
Hitler forms evil Axis, attempts to take over the World
In Korea the US lost approx. 36,568 soldiers
Communist expansion threatens to spread over the world if not checked.
In Vietnam the US lost approx. 58,199 soldiers
Again, but this time it is the Asian mainland
In the Gulf War the US lost approx. 529 soldiers
Mideast Peace and stable oil supply is threatened
In Afghanistan the US has lost approx. 491 soldiers
Attempt to bring the actual group responsible for 9/11 attack to justice,
Unfortunately, ringleader able to escape to Pakistan because ...
In Iraq the US has lost approx. 4020 soldiers
A decade previous, "they tried to kill my Daddy".
-
I'm fairly certain the majority of the people who are actually doing the fighting would rather be doing something else.
-
Quote: In Iraq the US has lost approx. 4020 soldiers
A decade previous, "they tried to kill my Daddy".
No. Wrong.
How about this: The US saw an excuse/way to position ourselves in a military role smack-dab in the middle east. If we decide to wage war against radical Islam, having a stronghold in the middle of it is a pretty good start and a pretty good military move. Iran isn't likely to get out of hand because we're right down the block. Israel isn't likely to go nuts and start raining bombs on anyone because we're there to play bodyguard.
If anyone thinks the US is in Iraq because of anything else, then you're just blind and believing the bullshit you hear on tv. -
I think that was officially the 5th excuse to have invaded. Could you explain how overthrowing a secure non-secular government and now encouraging an unstable Islamic government to replace it is going to help fight radical Islam?
-
^^^ and to protect our oil interests
-
Saddam tried to kill Hillary's daddy? link?
-
^^^^ Could you expand on who the "our" is in those oil interests? I just filled up for $3.35 a gallon, should I be glad 4000 people died for that?
-
No, Al Gore's daddy dummy.
-
^^^^^^ about the oil
-
[EDIT: for tedforrest:] then you "should be glad 4,000 people died for that."
-
They (the governement) will continue to throw out excuses some of which (like the one i cited) may be true in whole or in part. They will continue to do that for as long as it takes until they feel like they've reached their objective, whether military or politically since the general public seems to be unwilling to accept the very premise of a modern day large scale war. (really, ever since Vietnam)
As for the US "unsettling" the area. That's true. They did. And I personally believe they intended to. The "unrest" is really confined to Iraq and we're already there. None of the countries around Iraq are feeling frisky because essentially we invaded one of the "better off" countries in the middle east, handed them their asses, and suffered only a small (in terms of wars) number of casualties. The unrest isn't spilling into other countries any more than in the past. -
It's not about oil
It's not about Bush's daddy
It's about (see my post at the bottom of pg1) -
Funny, the two "destabilizing" groups you mention are both in power due to US interference in the region. Oh wait, history doesn't matter. The U.S. encompasses everything good. Jesus loves you. Buy more cars. etc...
xTEDFORRESTx ownage. -
It is about oil, it is about Bush's daddy, it is about big business and capitalizing on uniquely lucrative opportunities.
-
It's amazing how stupid people can be.
-
It's more than all that jtown. Really. It is.
It's a big strategy. It's just too simple to say it's about Oil and Bush.
Sure, it's definately got an Oil component to it. But if you're not seeing the bigger picture, than you're not looking. -
i believe u are also one siding this in perespective u should also show the body counts of these countries weve invaded. i.e. how many iraqis have died? how many afghanistanians have died?
-
Well I guess I'm not looking, but this "bigger picture" that you speak of is probably consistent with the higher ranking Govt. officials making stupid profits and shipping a ton of cheese to their old school chums.
-
When you go to war you look at YOUR casualty counts, not your enemies. Sad, but true.
-
The people who think this war was about oil or Bush's father.












