Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
My uncle and I, at a family bbq, got into a debate over what's harder to master, chess or poker. He's a very strong chess player and I like to fancy myself as a fairly solid poker player (mid stakes winner online). Would love to think what OT thinks.
*Poker wise when I say master I mean high stakes winner online, comfortable sitting in Bobby's room. Chess wise I would say atleast a 2400+ rating. -
chess
/thread -
haha care to elaborate?.........I would say poker due to the fact that there is incomplete information making the puzzle a bit harder to solve.......while chess all the info is in front of you
Edited By: Brunson10 Aug 20th, 2010 at 08:33 PM
*also would be cool to hear from people that play both games well.....I am pretty lol @ chess so probably over looking a bunch of things chess wise -
I would think chess is. Poker is easier to master because most of the time there is a lot of down time ie. folding and you can learn by playing lots of hands at the same time. Chess requires your full concentration in a game because as they say you have to think 2 moves in advance. That's just from my experience.
-
pretty much zero luck in Chess so i'm going to have to say Chess is the harder game to master.
-
I would say poker requires this same skill
Originally Posted by Defndrofangels
I would think chess is. Poker is easier to master because most of the time there is a lot of down time ie. folding and you can learn by playing lots of hands at the same time. Chess requires your full concentration in a game because as they say you have to think 2 moves in advance. That's just from my experience.
yea but if poker is being played with strict br management then the luck factor really plays no part in any of this -
i think poker is harder since there is the bankroll issue... Chess is free to play and as you get better you can continue to play more and more and keep going. Then with poker you can do the same, but unless you have the bankroll you can never really test yourself against the best in the world (bobbys room), and will continue to play the the stakes you can afford. Also there has to be 20 max pros (not just rich guys) that play regularly in bobbys room, and according to wiki there are 1800 players with 2400 + ratings so?
-
There is zero luck in chess, and zero room for error. I can play a grandmaster 100 games of chess and I am guaranteed to lose them all, and I am about a 1600 ELO rating.
I can play a HU world champ 100 times heads up at various poker games and probably win at least 10-20 % of them. -
Chess AINEC
-
Chess and I usually hate when people say this, but it's not even close.
-
Well. There is the some luck... You can make all the right moves by chance... But that's like 0.[add a bunch of zeros here]1% chance. It's not even close to being as easy as hitting a gutshot, or a runner runner flush.
Originally Posted by Synappzz
There is zero luck in chess, and zero room for error. I can play a grandmaster 100 games of chess and I am guaranteed to lose them all, and I am about a 1600 ELO rating.
I can play a HU world champ 100 times heads up at various poker games and probably win at least 10-20 % of them. -
Chess and you're retarded for even thinking this is debatable
Edited By: OneUglyMoFo Aug 20th, 2010 at 08:52 PM
Reason: your to you're as always -
Chess players are generally much nerdier than poker players. Nerds have no life, so they sit around studying chess all day. Mystery solved
-
lol @ anyone saying poker.
chess requires so much more skill.
You could just ride a heater or an insane run of cards to the high stakes life, theres no such thing as a heater or "running good" in chess. -
He's not asking which game has more skill...hes asking which is harder to master and the answer is poker.
-
yea but as someone pointed out earlier, sit down and play magnus carlsen or garry kasparov, and you will NEVER win. Ever.
Sit down with like Phil Ivey etc., and you could quite plausibly win, depending on how well you run. -
Thats the point Ozzie...even the best poker players in the world lose.
-
I can dig that.
Originally Posted by ajedrez
lol @ anyone saying poker.
chess requires so much more skill.
You could just ride a heater or an insane run of cards to the high stakes life, theres no such thing as a heater or "running good" in chess.
But come on with, "you could ride a heater to the high stakes life", sure you could but you'd be broke rather quickly if you're not very good at the game. -
You're such a donk.
Originally Posted by LatestLines2
He's not asking which game has more skill...hes asking which is harder to master and the answer is poker.
The only relevant argument I can think of on the "poker" side, is that poker is constantly changing. There is not enough room to be creative in chess that that will happen there. -
I'm losing my mind reading these responses.
-
really? chess has been around longer and has certainly evolved just as much....I'm sure it will continue to change
-
chess, anyone who thinks otherwise is an idiot
-
yahtzee
-
poker.
chess theory has been figured out and doesnt change.
poker changes ALL the time. you have nothing to adapt with in chess because you should be making the same exact play in the same situations for every single move. you play the same hand in the same situation 10000 different ways in poker.
Similar Threads
-
0 Replies
PocketFives is to Poker as ( ) is to chess ?
By ilivebythe5 in Off Topic
Last Post: Jan 12th, 2010, 09:33 PM - 22 Replies
-
25 Replies
Why poker bots are NOT chess bots...
By supermoves in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Nov 27th, 2006, 06:19 PM -
48 Replies
Chess/Backgammon/Magic and POKER...
By nevertilt22 in Poker Discussion
Last Post: May 9th, 2006, 01:59 PM -
12 Replies
chessmasters, and poker players....does anyone play chess anymore?
By Cashweekly in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Mar 2nd, 2006, 09:09 AM












