Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
Hmmm let’s see here ... 50+ million died in WW2
How many have died since in every war, skirmish, and insertion, whatever?
Add them all up together and I bet it’s not even close.
America owning militarily is the greatest thing for peace since humans have decided they don’t like each other.
At least for the time being our country is more powerful than any other in the history of civilization.
It’s a fact of life that people argue, sometime arguments escalate to fighting, and sometimes fights escalate further into war.
Until we live in a Utopia and everyone gets along, I like the idea that the most powerful country also believes in fundamental freedoms.
Other countries believe in other fundamentals, such as oppression, censorship, and genocide.
Should we allow anyone else to wield the torch of such power?
Where would the world be if any other country was in charge?
Name which country you would choose to replace us as the leading world power?
Who would be their leader? What are their fundamental ideals?
Do you really believe if stayed out of global politics, everyone else would just get along? -
A quick look at latin american history proves this to be false. The most powerful country only believes in protecting its interests. when freedom in other countries does not align with our interests, we no longer believe in freedom.
Edited By: Neeek Oct 9th, 2011 at 06:43 AM -
Edited By: gamma21 Oct 9th, 2011 at 06:49 AMWhat? While our country is better than most when it comes to freedom, we fall short in way too many areas. Are you trying to say that the US doesn't believe in censorship? Don't get me wrong, I love being an American, but I also think we could and we should do a hell of a lot better. How can a Russian or Venezuelan guy play online poker, while an American cannot? How does someone living under a repressive dictator have more freedom in that respect than I do?Originally Posted by treypear
Hmmm let’s see here ... 50+ million died in WW2
How many have died since in every war, skirmish, and insertion, whatever?
Add them all up together and I bet it’s not even close.
America owning militarily is the greatest thing for peace since humans have decided they don’t like each other.
At least for the time being our country is more powerful than any other in the history of civilization.
It’s a fact of life that people argue, sometime arguments escalate to fighting, and sometimes fights escalate further into war.
Until we live in a Utopia and everyone gets along, I like the idea that the most powerful country also believes in fundamental freedoms.
Other countries believe in other fundamentals, such as oppression, censorship, and genocide.
Should we allow anyone else to wield the torch of such power?
Where would the world be if any other country was in charge?
Name which country you would choose to replace us as the leading world power?
Who would be their leader? What are their fundamental ideals?
Do you really believe if stayed out of global politics, everyone else would just get along?
Why does a country need to replace the US? The US doesn't go into wars simply to help defend those that are vulnerable and having their freedom trampled on. If we did, we'd have gone in and helped the people in the Sudan. Why is it our problem if other countries get along? -
Im not a latin american political expert so could you please elaborate?
Originally Posted by Neeek
A quick look at latin american history proves this to be false. The most powerful country only believes in protecting its interests. when freedom in other countries does not align with our interests, we no longer believe in freedom.
But my thoughts ...
What if our interests are freedom?
We now have bases in Germany, Italy, and Japan since the last great war. We dont force them to live our way of life, we just tell them not to force others to live thier way of life. That was their intentions before WW2. From the beginning of time every country that became a world power was set on domination. Rome, Mongolia, France, Germany, etc...
The difference is our domination is that others should be free to choose for themselves as long as they dont harm or impose their will upon others.
We are the premier world power, and we do impose our will on others, but our imposition is with the intentions of freedom, peace, and prosperity. Not domination!
Its a subtle difference but if you read history i think you will come to recognize and respect the difference. -
You can't impose freedom.
We are the premier world power, and we do impose our will on others, but our imposition is with the intentions of freedom, peace, and prosperity. Not domination! -
I wish online poker was legal. I wish weed was legal. I wish gay marriage was legal. I wish stop signs were mere suggestions and you could left turn on red. I wish i had more wishes. I wish we had many more freedoms than we currently do. I dont argue that we are the most free, were not even the most democratic.
Originally Posted by gamma21
What? While our country is better than most when it comes to freedom, we fall short in way too many areas. Are you trying to say that the US doesn't believe in censorship? Don't get me wrong, I love being an American, but I also think we could and we should do a hell of a lot better. How can a Russian or Venezuelan guy play online poker, while an American cannot? How does someone living under a repressive dictator have more freedom in that respect than I do?
Why does a country need to replace the US? The US doesn't go into wars simply to help defend those that are vulnerable and having their freedom trampled on. If we did, we'd have gone in and helped the people in the Sudan. Why is it our problem if other countries get along?
We do however have the first and oldest modern democratic constitution. We do attempt to lead the way in freedoms even if we dont always succeed. IMO better than anyone else ever has since the magna carta or knights of camelot(depending on whether you like history or fiction)
As far as Sudan it would be nice if we were powerful enough to help everyone. Ron Paul wouldnt even want to try.
I've never heard of freedom being rejected. -
Originally Posted by treypear
We are the premier world power, and we do impose our will on others, but our imposition is with the intentions of freedom, peace, and prosperity. Not domination!
because overthrowing democratically elected leaders and installing "friendly" regimes (which we have done several times) is the definition of freedom, peace and prosperity, and not domination. -
I'm a fan of the ad. I'm glad a candidate is thinking out of the box on ads for a change. It's refreshing.
-
To 3- When have we done this, (not that im disagreeing), but everyone says this but never cites times, places, leaders etc...
Edited By: treypear Oct 9th, 2011 at 07:40 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sfGw98pVCA
we can answer moral questions rationally dyz
Reason: cause i can -
Edited By: threeven Oct 9th, 2011 at 07:56 AMOriginally Posted by treypear
When have we done this, (not that im disagreeing), but everyone says this but never cites times, places, leaders etc...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d'%C3%A9tat
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1954_Guatemalan_coup_d'%C3%A9tat -
No idea what you mean. My point was that if freedom is imposed on someone then it isn't freedom.
-
Good examples ... the guatemalan one seems especially tragic.
Obv America has made several mistakes and will continue to make several more.
If Geopolitics was a poker game I would say we fucked up these hands royally.
But at this time we have 30% of the chips in play with 196 entrants left. Do we just quit the game because we didnt play every hand perfectly or should we learn from our mistakes?
What if freedom is imposed on a previous dictatorship where the majority population is now free to elect their own leaders and make their own choices without being under duress or having fear of repurcussions? -
Freedom can't be imposed. The dictator was imposing his will on the people, assuming he wasn't democratically elected. One can remove the dicatator but you can't impose freedom. You can't be forced to be free any more than you can force a horse to drink even if you do lead it to water.
-
im·pe·ri·al·ism [im-peer-ee-uh-liz-uhm]
1.
the policy of extending the rule or authority of an empire or nation over foreign countries, or of acquiring and holding colonies and dependencies.
I would say that we extend the authority of our nation over foreign countries. -
We're not imperialists, who let Chomsky into OT, that's just silly talk. Sure we have hundreds of military bases and some territories around the world but that is just to spread freedom and democracy. It's for the good of the world
-
Originally Posted by norcaljeff
Ending the wars? Wtf does that mean? Just pull out, after all the blood and treasure we've spent? I mean, we are already leaving iraq after winning and bringing freedom to the belly of the beast. We abandoned the iraqis and let them get slaughtered after gbush I pussed out. We broke our word to them and we shouldnt do it again. We abandoned afghanistan after helping them defeat the russians and look how that turned out. If we abandon both countries again it will be worse than if we never went in.
You cant really think that rp would somehow repeal the patriot act and legalize weed for all do you (assuming he actually had a chance of getting elected lol)
As for batshit insane, hell yes. He just pretended our liberating forces in oppressed lands are somehow comparable to commie-fascist chinese troops invading a free country. It's sfretarded i still can't believe it's real. Yeah yeah we arent free bc we cant smoke weed and play online pokers....
Loool holy shit i just saw the part about strippingvtheir resources. Have more koolaid. Where's "our" oil? Lmfao unreal
I don't even... -
Commas, as well as other punctuation such as periods and question marks at the end of a quote, belong within quotation marks, even when not part of the quoted text.
-
hahaaaaa dayummm im starting to think he could actually WIN!
-
edit: wrong thread
Edited By: zeppelinzoso16 Oct 10th, 2011 at 12:50 AM -
The world would be a much better place if people like norcaljeff weren't allowed to vote. I can't believe you are real Jeff every post you make is the same worthless bullshit over and over again. You are the worst poster on this site and I am ashamed that you have norcal in your screen name. If you actually believe even half the bullshit you post on here then there is something seriously wrong with your political outlook.
-
Only if people like killingbird aren't allowed to vote either. I mean, killingbird is the guy that keeps saying things are better under President Obama even when President Obama has said things are worse today than they were 3 years ago.
Originally Posted by CeJeH
The world would be a much better place if people like norcaljeff weren't allowed to vote. I can't believe you are real Jeff every post you make is the same worthless bullshit over and over again. You are the worst poster on this site and I am ashamed that you have norcal in your screen name. If you actually believe even half the bullshit you post on here then there is something seriously wrong with your political outlook.
Lemmings on either said are the worst. -
Killingbird doesn't have 47 million posts though. Jeff is in every. single. thread. every day, for eternity. endless mount everest sized pile of bullshit.
-
Having a bunch of posts doesn't make norcaljeff any worse than a guy that thinks the economy and unemployment have improved under President Obama.
Originally Posted by CeJeH
Killingbird doesn't have 47 million posts though. Jeff is in every. single. thread. every day, for eternity. endless mount everest sized pile of bullshit.
-
qfgrammarfail
Originally Posted by USCswimmer
"Hear", idiot*
Punctuation is a skill
This thread has made me just shake my head at each post you have posted...
Sick examples.Originally Posted by CeJeH
The world would be a much better place if people like norcaljeff weren't allowed to vote. I can't believe you are real Jeff every post you make is the same worthless bullshit over and over again. You are the worst poster on this site and I am ashamed that you have norcal in your screen name. If you actually believe even half the bullshit you post on here then there is something seriously wrong with your political outlook.
Similar Threads
-
2 Replies
Here's a cool bipartisan (yes, still political) story
Last Post: Oct 30th, 2010, 01:40 AM - 39 Replies
- 9 Replies
-
29 Replies
A Ron Paul question(i have not read a single word of any previous paul threads)
By RonKarkovice in Off Topic
Last Post: Jan 11th, 2008, 07:20 PM -
113 Replies
(USA) OT Election - Obama vs. Paul (Ron Paul elected OT President 59-35)
Last Post: Jan 4th, 2008, 11:47 PM










