Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. Edit: Holy crap this changes everything if true. Ignore the OP below and just watch this video and comment below.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KySKsH9uDaE



    http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-mone...percent-layoff

    Most of the time anways. Postal Union has me especially pissed off. USPS is proposing laying off 20% of it's workforce to cut costs etc and of course the union has it in worker's contracts they can't be laid off sigh. It's time to suck it up imo. USPS has lost $20bil in TAXPAYER money in last 4 years, $8.5bil in fy2010 alone and mail traffic has dropped 20% in that timeframe. Obv the industry is shrinking and so should the workforce.

    Edit: Something else i saw in a comment that i found interesting: Simply amazing that is all that I have to say about management within the USPS. There is (1) supervisor per (11) employees. Wonder how many vice-presidents, regional or district management employees are going to bite the bullet. It amazes me that an office with 15 postal employees (clerks, city carriers and rural route carriers) but also have (1) postmaster and (1) supervisor. The postmaster and supervisor combined income $148,000.00…time for members of congress to do something about postal management, not the lower levels.

    The 1 supervisor to 11 employees doesnt seem too unreasonable, but the salaries of those supervisors does. They're making more $ than an E7 deployed to a combat zone that is usually in charge of about 40 or more Soldiers, obv very overpaid.
    Edited By: kasey_gcp Aug 13th, 2011 at 09:04 PM
  2. yeah $148,000 sounds like a ton for 2 managers of 15 workers... not.

    I'd rather spend $250k for managers who know what they're doing, managing 25 employees... same amount per employee managed, but eliminate the government inefficiency and it works.
     
  3. I've been in the military 13 years and manage 11 Soldiers by myself and make <70k/year even while deployed, so i would assume you would agree the military is underpaid if you're saying USPS manager's pay is low. And lol at "inefficiency", that's only part of the problem. Simply put less and less people are using "snail mail" each year.
    Thread Starter
  4. The USPS has been losing money each year since before you were born. Why do you think the cost of a stamp keeps increasing? The USPS will have to do things to cut costs. Laying off newer, part time employees (this is almost universally how people first enter the USPS) is an obvious starting place. Saturday delivery will be abolished which eliminates hours for the Union members as well.

    Why do you hate the Union? They aren't paying the Managers $148,000 annually, the USPS is. In this case all the Union can do is ensure it's members seniority rights are respected over the new hires. Is that so wrong in your well thought out opinion?
  5. I'll eat them grilled. Like on a cheeseburger or something.
  6. you think that's crazy, check out how sweet USPS's benefits are. that shit is legit.
  7. Just like my hate for the tea party who takes tax increases completely off the table I hate any union that takes layoffs completely off the table. Fuck them.
  8. It is law that the USPS has to be in all those rural cities that service very small amounts of folks. That is where they bleed money. There are way too many post offices and they cannot close a single one unless the law changes. We need to change that law if there is a reason for it.

    Also, the post office has always been a coveted job. My whole time growing up here in detroit I have had 1 mailman. I graduated highschool went into the army, came back nine years later, that same guy is still delivering that route. Amazing. thirty years its been the same guy. That should tell you how great it is to work for them.
  9. This is a pretty good description of what's going on.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KySKsH9uDaE
     
  10. USPS is a joke. The cost of stamps does not cover the cost of mailing something and to top it off, they let companies fucking advertise through the mail on the taxpayers' dime!
  11.  
    Originally Posted by (oIo) View Post

    Also, the post office has always been a coveted job. My whole time growing up here in detroit I have had 1 mailman. I graduated highschool went into the army, came back nine years later, that same guy is still delivering that route. Amazing. thirty years its been the same guy. That should tell you how great it is to work for them.

    Same goes for UPS drivers, especially those with a nice cushy route. those bastards will fight for the death to be a full-time driver. can't say much the same for folks at FedEx.
  12. Pretty sure the USPS does not operate primarily on tax dollars....

    From wiki...
    The USPS has not directly received taxpayer-dollars since the early 1980s with the minor exception of subsidies for costs associated with the disabled and overseas voters.
     
  13. they are losing someones money then
     
  14.  
    Originally Posted by Shaaarrrp View Post

    Pretty sure the USPS does not operate primarily on tax dollars....

    From wiki...
    The USPS has not directly received taxpayer-dollars since the early 1980s with the minor exception of subsidies for costs associated with the disabled and overseas voters.

    This. Fuck unions, but get your facts together OP>
  15. and obv you are underpaid kasey
     
  16. I wasn't aware that they aren't receiving much $ from the gov't and i'm pretty shocked by that actually. Now wtf is gonna happen when they finally have to eat the billions they are in debt? Obv bailout.
    Thread Starter
  17. way to choose your battles, OP. yes, the managers making ~75k a year at the postoffice are what is wrong with America. wrong enough to get you angry at them personally after reading a blog post. wrong enough to get you riled up at the system, when you haven't even taken the 10 minutes it would take to understand its funding. fuck unions indeed. jesus christ.
    Edited By: Neeek Aug 13th, 2011 at 07:55 PM
  18. Neeek whether they're tax-dollar funded or not is irrelevant really. Either they lose billions in taxpayer dollars every year or they rack up billions in debt and get a gov't bailout. Obv the more workers getting paid rediculous $ when they're not even needed the more debt they're gonna rack up each year. So yeah, fuck unions.
    Thread Starter
  19. They don't use taxpayer's money in so far as they actually break even, which never happens.

    They run just as inefficiently as any government operation knowing that the crutch of public money will support their financial failure.

    Just charge $1 (or whatever it actually costs) to mail a letter ffs.
  20.  
    Originally Posted by XquiziVex View Post

    Just charge $1 (or whatever it actually costs) to mail a letter ffs.

    nah, I'd rather get mad at the postman that makes like 65k a year!
  21. Making a decent salary isn't something to be that upset about. Someone who has worked for say 20 years and performed well deserves to make a decent living.

    The problem is all the bullshit benefits that are associated with a lot of Union jobs.

    I'd probably be upset too if someone wanted to take away my ability to retire at 50yo (some municipal gigs are even earlier) with a full pension equalling or surpassing my current salary. Oh, not to mention awesome health benefits.

    Damn the non-union peons for getting upset at that awesomeness.
  22.  
    Originally Posted by kasey_gcp View Post

    Neeek whether they're tax-dollar funded or not is irrelevant really. Either they lose billions in taxpayer dollars every year or they rack up billions in debt and get a gov't bailout. Obv the more workers getting paid rediculous $ when they're not even needed the more debt they're gonna rack up each year. So yeah, fuck unions.

    I mean, you didn't even take the time to understand where their funding comes from, but you feel supremely confident in reaching the conclusion that it is all the union's fault? you are mad at the average postal worker making 75k a year, while simultaneously recognizing that you are grossly underpaid? you really think the person in a similar situation as you is the demon here?

    You work for a private military contractor, don't you? You aren't mad at the billionaire CEOs of your company that put YOUR life at risk while grossly underpaying you, while they sit back and make billions off of taxpayer-funded military operations? you're really mad at the postalworker union instead, because their employees make more than you?
  23. you guys should go back and read AbnormalQ's thread on unions linked below in similar threads. Its about UAW just before economy collapsed / bailouts were handed out. eerily similar in reference to how both unions have locked up ridiculous pensions that are underfunded by the corp who eventually is unable to pay them and gets bailed out.

     
    Originally Posted by Neeek View Post

    I mean, you didn't even take the time to understand where their funding comes from, but you feel supremely confident in reaching the conclusion that it is all the union's fault? you are mad at the average postal worker making 75k a year, while simultaneously recognizing that you are grossly underpaid? you really think the person in a similar situation as you is the demon here?

    You work for a private military contractor, don't you? You aren't mad at the billionaire CEOs of your company that put YOUR life at risk while grossly underpaying you, while they sit back and make billions off of taxpayer-funded military operations? you're really mad at the postalworker union instead, because their employees make more than you?

    You're completely missing the point. USPS is operating at a bigger and bigger loss each year, eventually they're gonna need bailous and drastic reforms. They're trying to start the reformation now by eliminating 20% of their workforce which is not needed anymore as they've suffered a 20% reduction in business the last 4 years. They are unable to lay off alot of these workers because they have it in their contracts they can't be laid off. This last part alone is what this is all about. How ridiculous is it to get hired by a company and be able to be guaranteed that if business declines and cutbacks are needed they can't lay you off?

    And no i'm not a private contractor, i serve in an Army where our "CEOs" barely make over 6 figures. But yes i believe contractors are ripping off the American taxpayer even worse than the USPS eventually will, especially Halliburton.
    Edited By: kasey_gcp Aug 13th, 2011 at 08:24 PM
    Thread Starter
  24. i hate onions, unless they are cooked. also, i prefer walla walla sweet.
  25. get back in the kitchen bish
    Thread Starter
  26. If the USPS was allowed to charge a competitive price for their services (similar to UPS and FED EX), they wouldn't constantly run a deficit. They are a not for profit business that is forced to subsidize the cost of mail and particularly rural delivery services to satisfy tax payer demands.
  27. You better put some of those walla walla sweets on my sammich.
  28. dinner gonna be cold tonight!!! ;)
  29. bump for new video in OP

    its always the workers that get blamed for the fuckups of congress/the higher-ups, and then are held responsible for fixing those fuckups.
    Edited By: Neeek Aug 13th, 2011 at 09:18 PM
  30.  
    Originally Posted by XquiziVex View Post

    Making a decent salary isn't something to be that upset about. Someone who has worked for say 20 years and performed well deserves to make a decent living.

    o hi der entitlement. why don't you tell that the grunt working at the gas station for 20 years? or the library, or any other job?

Similar Threads