[x]Register Now
Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
uhh..problem fixed! nothing to see here n00bs!! look away!
-
Nothing to see here
shhh everyone just relax nothing to see -
this is a question only a woman could ask
-
The way you capitalized Correspondence suggests to me that you are attaching significance to the term that I may not be. In any case, I don't just equate them, I define "true" as "corresponding to reality". As in, a proposition is true if it describes how shit actually is. As in, if I individually inspected each of the concretes to which the proposition refers, I would be able to verify its validity with my own senses. Or, failing that, if I broke down the proposition to its base premises, its falsehood would result in a contradiction.
Originally Posted by AbnormalQ

Em, again, you seem to be equating Truth with Correspondence, which for affirmations, is not correct, imho.
If you don't like my definition you should propose your own. I find it interesting that your and Seykota's posts in this thread implicitly assume objective truth. You used the word "correct", she used the word "accurate". Good luck escaping that which is axiomatic.
Edit: from your thingy below:
<span>A statement is true when what is stated exists, either by affirmation or denial. </span>
<span><span>works for me</span></span> -
Are you fucking kidding me with this shit? lol
Originally Posted by AbnormalQ
And, something is true only be participating in thetruth and thus the truth of the true is in the truth itself, but not the otherway around. Thus, the thing stated should not be called the truth, but thecause of its truth. The purpose of affirmation is to signify that what is isand it ought to do this, that is, it signifies what it should. It is the samething for the thing stated to be correct and to be true, that is, to signifythat what is is.
Translate this to English for me Oxford. Please and thank you. : ) -
the book I'm gonna write is: "YES! The World DOES Revolve Around You..as it does me." etc.
boom riches! -
i agree with this statement - the truth exists - whether or not we know what fraction of it is debatable











