yeah but what's the mode of women?

lol these threads are so ghey but I'll write what I've been tossing around for a while.

Beauty is objective on average. That's to say, beauty is defined as the observer's interpretation and reaction to a women's appearance.

It's obvious some guys are attracted to girls the rest of us find disgusting. Objective beauty most definitely leaves room for outliers and it can't be used as a definitive, calculated measurement. A "look" can be calculated, but interpretation of such leaves room for anomalous behavior.

The thing with these threads is, the process of posting and the thought behind composing something worth reading, along with the impersonal response to what everyone else reads, tends to normalize an X/10 rating that shakes criticism on both sides. This may be an objective rating of objective beauty, but as it's expressed through the internet forum media it stirs negativity directed toward people rating her both higher and lower than X/10, especially for the lower raters who might be operating on nothing but their own perception.

It's most definitely possible to find her less attractive than the normalized X/10 here and the greater the difference with any individual rating, the greater the internet butthurtedness.

It's science, really.

/coors

 

Originally Posted by Hank H1LL

lol these threads are so ghey but I'll write what I've been tossing around for a while.

Beauty is objective on average. That's to say, beauty is defined as the observer's interpretation and reaction to a women's appearance.

It's obvious some guys are attracted to girls the rest of us find disgusting. Objective beauty most definitely leaves room for outliers and it can't be used as a definitive, calculated measurement. A "look" can be calculated, but interpretation of such leaves room for anomalous behavior.

The thing with these threads is, the process of posting and the thought behind composing something worth reading, along with the impersonal response to what everyone else reads, tends to normalize an X/10 rating that shakes criticism on both sides. This may be an objective rating of objective beauty, but as it's expressed through the internet forum media it stirs negativity directed toward people rating her both higher and lower than X/10, especially for the lower raters who might be operating on nothing but their own perception.

It's most definitely possible to find her less attractive than the normalized X/10 here and the greater the difference with any individual rating, the greater the internet butthurtedness.

It's science, really.

/coors

What is shit that happens while waiting for new pics?

honestly don't have time for all you fucking retards. how is this a 5 page thread

emma watson is fucking getting NAKED in a movie and dolts are complaining

just fucking breathe through your mouth more retards

lolollll FWK

Fwk.

Death before dishonor.

 

Originally Posted by Believer82

come on Waco emma is average looking what drugs are you on.. Ok maybe I bit above but she aint shit
special as far as body and looks cmon! That is kinda like saying your better at poker than me

Believer folks

 

Originally Posted by Believer82

come on Waco emma is average looking what drugs are you on.. Ok maybe I bit above but she aint shit
special as far as body and looks cmon! That is kinda like saying your better at poker than me

50 shades of gay

ok didnt read thread, but im going to take a guess at what happened on the first 4 pages and beyond.

OP posts something about emma watson getting naked in 50 shades of ghey (read op's post), bunch of people come in and post tons of pics of emma watson, everything is going good and then someone comes in and says something about her not being hot or pointy elbows or some shit, crazyness ensues and twk gets butthurt, more people come in and defend twk, war says something irrelevant pervy or retarded (maybe all 3), everyone is thrown off and thread goes back to pics, sketchy defends emma's hotness with the help of some random lurkers, lameass comes in and says something sucks (prolly emma watson), prestunluv back to call everyone pervs and lizardboy joins in to help, dolphin tries to join haters but haters turn hate on dolphin, sandman realizes he's missing a thread about bishes and says something borderline homo, xxedpxx says something sarcastic but everyone takes it serial and yells at him, bfactor rights 3 paragraphs that nobody reads, mr123 comes in to tell us how drunk he is and that he would smash, norcaljeff posts a funny gif, someone else posts a not funny gif, amartin quotes norcals gif and agrees with someone in thread about something, twk comes back to post a bunch of new hot pics of emma watson and more praises of her giner follow.

the next 2 pages will be a rotation of going back and forth between between posting pics of emma, people talking about fapping, return of haters to call people pervy. lameass reads this and tells me to go fuck myslef, sluggerwv takes over and post random gifs and pics of girls asses and the thread will die. in a few weeks or whatever the movie will come out, this thread will get bumbed and the whole process will start all over again. the end.

waco would not play me if i put up 50 k in cash and he put up 50 k for mix games nl omaha blah blah

stay on topic please

She already said a long time ago that she'd go nude given the right situations. But she also mentioned that she'd def do it if the movie was with a certain director. Forgot his name but hollywood better be already talking to him.

 

Originally Posted by norv

looks like mena suvari in this pic

 

Originally Posted by Duffy08

pretty redic how much hotter every girl is with long hair than short

fyp

 

Originally Posted by Believer82

waco would not play me if i put up 50 k in cash and he put up 50 k for mix games nl omaha blah blah

waco probably doesn't need to get a job at walmart next month tho, either.