Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local

Fred Jackson or McFadden?

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 21 2
  1. donkosaurus donkosaurus is offline

    Burlingame, CA
    United States

    Posts: 499
    Joined: Jan 06

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 4:02pm)

    I've got both on my FF team but I feel they're both going to suck massive asshole tonight.

    Who will suck less in your opinion?
  2. Futon Futon is offline

    Ndola
    Zambia

    Posts: 11,644
    Joined: Oct 07

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 4:04pm) in reply to donkosaurus

    How close is your game? If you're gonna need a big night I'd go McFadden. If you think you need 8-10 pts to win Jackson might be the safer play
  3. GPop21 GPop21 is offline

    North Pole, AK
    United States

    Posts: 4,593
    Joined: May 06

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 4:04pm) in reply to donkosaurus

    McFadden FTMFW immfho
  4. donkosaurus donkosaurus is offline

    Burlingame, CA
    United States

    Posts: 499
    Joined: Jan 06

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 4:05pm) in reply to Futon

    I'm up 16 with Jackson or McFadden VS. LT, Lee Evans, Chargers D
    Thread Starter
  5. Leet8s Leet8s is offline usausausausausa

    New York City, NY
    United States

    Posts: 8,036
    Joined: Aug 06

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 4:06pm) in reply to GPop21

    I really like McFadden. Also, the Bills O-line sucks major dick
     
  6. Futon Futon is offline

    Ndola
    Zambia

    Posts: 11,644
    Joined: Oct 07

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 4:07pm) in reply to donkosaurus

    I'd go McFadden
  7. gimmietheloot gimmietheloot is offline

    Posts: 265
    Joined: Feb 08

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 4:31pm) in reply to Futon

    Mcfadden is so much better it's not even a funny
     
  8. Rocky Rocky is offline

    WI
    United States

    Posts: 5,157
    Joined: Apr 07

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 4:40pm) in reply to donkosaurus

    Fred Jackson was the #1 ranked RB this week for FBB on espn.com. Just sayin.

    http://games.espn.go.com/ffl/tools/p...ringPeriodId=1

    I'd def start him over McFadden.
     
  9. phillies2008 phillies2008 is offline

    Posts: 185
    Joined: Jul 09

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 4:40pm) in reply to donkosaurus

    this is a dumb question
  10. donkosaurus donkosaurus is offline

    Burlingame, CA
    United States

    Posts: 499
    Joined: Jan 06

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 4:48pm) in reply to phillies2008

    and thats a dumb fucking answer.
    Thread Starter
  11. Rocky Rocky is offline

    WI
    United States

    Posts: 5,157
    Joined: Apr 07

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 4:54pm) in reply to phillies2008

     
    Originally Posted by phillies2008 View Post

    this is a dumb question

    Care to give your 2c?
     
  12. Randers Randers is offline

    Posts: 12,888
    Joined: Nov 05

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 5:08pm) in reply to donkosaurus

    ppr is jackson.
     
  13. phillies2008 phillies2008 is offline

    Posts: 185
    Joined: Jul 09

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 5:25pm) in reply to Rocky

     
    Originally Posted by Rocky Of Poker View Post

    Care to give your 2c?

    the only thing oakland actually does well is run( top 10 last 2 years), and mcfadden is uber-talented(and healthy) and he's playing at home vs a san diego D that was horrible last year ( i know last year is last year but look at the defensive roster, nothing has changed except merriman back). Fred Jackson isnt that good to be begin with, and is playing behind an offensive line that is starting 2 rookies and none of the 5 played the same position they played last year, and lets face it, Bufffalo will be down 2 td's in the first 10 minutes anyway. and did you see the bills first team offense in the pre-season? 11 drives, 0 td's, 1 fg. YIKES

    its pretty simple imo
  14. TheAlbatross TheAlbatross is online now

    Los Angeles, CA
    United States

    Posts: 6,893
    Joined: Sep 05

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 5:27pm) in reply to donkosaurus

    for my own sake, i hope its mcfadden
  15. Randers Randers is offline

    Posts: 12,888
    Joined: Nov 05

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 5:33pm) in reply to phillies2008

    the chargers were top 1/4 or 1/3 against the run.

    they have a stout front 7 and they crushed the raiders in both meetings last yr.
     
  16. MonkeyCowboy MonkeyCowboy is online now

    United States

    Posts: 6,869
    Joined: Apr 05

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 5:37pm) in reply to donkosaurus

    Fred MacMurray IMO
  17. donkosaurus donkosaurus is offline

    Burlingame, CA
    United States

    Posts: 499
    Joined: Jan 06

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 5:49pm) in reply to MonkeyCowboy

    Sure Raiders were Top 10 in rush yardage but they only scored 9 TDs - tied for 28th in the league.

    Buffalo 14th in yards, 11th in TDs.

    San Diego rush D was 11th for yards, 8th for TDs....but New England was even better.

    Richard Seymour is gone though...but then Derrick Burgess is in there.

    Factor in that I'm playing the Chargers D, I'll go with Jackson. If the Chargers D has a great day, that means I'll get squaddoosh from McFadden.

    Make sense?
    Thread Starter
  18. phillies2008 phillies2008 is offline

    Posts: 185
    Joined: Jul 09

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 5:56pm) in reply to Randers

     
    Originally Posted by Randers View Post

    the chargers were top 1/4 or 1/3 against the run.

    they have a stout front 7 and they crushed the raiders in both meetings last yr.

    no they werent and no they werent
  19. Mike Kowal Mike Kowal is offline

    OH
    United States

    Posts: 481
    Joined: Jan 07

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 6:02pm) in reply to phillies2008

    I'd easily rather start Jackson ... GL either way you go.
  20. Rocky Rocky is offline

    WI
    United States

    Posts: 5,157
    Joined: Apr 07

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 6:03pm) in reply to donkosaurus

    I think espn knows more than you but I could care less who does better. I thought I'd share that link that shows Jackon is highly ranked this week. I'm not a fan of either RB. I am not impressed with McFadden or Jackon at the moment. I think SD defense will be alot better this season tho.
     
  21. DWare94 DWare94 is offline

    Salt Lake City, UT
    United States

    Posts: 3,806
    Joined: Aug 06

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 6:31pm) in reply to Rocky

    Going to be watching this game closely. Took Dmac in both of my leagues and im pretty thin at RB in one of those leagues.
     
  22. Bong BrOke Bong BrOke is offline need new bong

    Fort Lauderdale, FL
    United States

    Posts: 6,782
    Joined: Nov 06

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 6:34pm) in reply to DWare94

    Last time Jackson played against NE he had over 130 yards...that being said I benched Chris Johnson for Fred Jackson this week and Im pretty sure it was the right move!
  23. Neeek Neeek is offline

    Kansas City, MO
    United States

    Posts: 8,349
    Joined: Sep 05

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 6:57pm) in reply to donkosaurus

    mcfadden ends with more points tonight, ldo. i'd put money on it.
  24. shipitthisway shipitthisway is offline

    Wheeling, WV
    United States

    Posts: 1,985
    Joined: Feb 06

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 7:00pm) in reply to Neeek

    I don't think its as lopsided an argument as some may suggest, but if you drafted McFadden you probably did so with a high pick. Simple logic.
     
  25. Randers Randers is offline

    Posts: 12,888
    Joined: Nov 05

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 7:11pm) in reply to phillies2008

     
    Originally Posted by phillies2008 View Post

     
    Originally Posted by Randers View Post


    the chargers were top 1/4 or 1/3 against the run.

    they have a stout front 7 and they crushed the raiders in both meetings last yr.

    no they werent and no they werent

    pro-football-reference.com

    also, the chargers have nearly 30 million$ locked up in their front 7 this year.

    preciate the quoting but make sure you aren't 'lol wrong' next time
     
  26. SILKY JOHNSON SILKY JOHNSON is offline

    San Diego, CA
    United States

    Posts: 3,335
    Joined: Apr 07

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 7:39pm) in reply to donkosaurus

    Jackson looks like he is gonna have a good game.
  27. gamma21 gamma21 is offline

    Redlands, CA
    United States

    Posts: 10,029
    Joined: Mar 06

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 9:47pm) in reply to Neeek

     
    Originally Posted by Neeek View Post

    mcfadden ends with more points tonight, ldo. i'd put money on it.

    Hmm...
     
  28. Bong BrOke Bong BrOke is offline need new bong

    Fort Lauderdale, FL
    United States

    Posts: 6,782
    Joined: Nov 06

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 9:49pm) in reply to SILKY JOHNSON

    Lets hope you went with Fred Jackson loool
  29. SavageChrist SavageChrist is offline

    Dayton, OH
    United States

    Posts: 701
    Joined: Oct 07

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 9:52pm) in reply to Bong BrOke

     
    Originally Posted by Bong BrOke View Post

    Lets hope you went with Fred Jackson loool

    I did for my free Rapid Draft. Hopefully the OP went with him, cause McFadden won't do much tonight.
  30. Neeek Neeek is offline

    Kansas City, MO
    United States

    Posts: 8,349
    Joined: Sep 05

    Sep 14th, 2009 (9/14/2009 9:56pm) in reply to gamma21

     
    Originally Posted by gamma21 View Post

    Hmm...

    you win some you lose some :(
Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 21 2

Similar Threads