Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
Troy Tulowitzki set to re-up with Rockies
Edited By: Admiral Nov 30th, 2010 at 03:39 AM
By Buster Olney
ESPN The Magazine
Archive
All-Star shortstop Troy Tulowitzki is close to concluding a new mega-deal that may, in the end, last as long as 10 years, according to sources.
Cargo long term deal one time?
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=5864835
-
They'd be overpaying him if they locked him up right now, and he doesn't hit arbitration until after 2011. He won't hit .336 again. Lock him up next year after his numbers drop a bit; he's still going to be a solid player, but I won't be surprised if last year is the best year of his career when its all said and done.
-
I saw this earlier and got a semi...
locking up cargo too is a must. not to mention some help on the mound is in order -
Hearing about this and probably resigning DeLa made my phuckin night.......
-
Tulo said that in honor of the new contract, he is committed to upping his games played to 125 next year.
Edited By: kellykip Nov 30th, 2010 at 07:10 AM
Gamers like Jeter play every day. -
-
If it was necessary to keep the best shortstop is baseball in Colorado I'm alright with it, helton has fallen off his last 2 years of his contract and Hampton was a bad fit for Colorado to begin with having a curveball as one of his top two pitches. Tulo has a very bright future and if this will give us 8 good years I will take it. The DLR signing is huge for us as well, a healthy de la Rosa and ubaldo should be able to keep up nicely with the sick pitching staffs of the nl west. We are in for some good ball the next few years.
-
I have trouble understanding this post. What was wrong with the Helton contracts? Hampton was obviously a mistake. Why are long term contracts stupid or bad for baseball? Especially if Tulo wants to be a marketable figure and put down some roots in Colorado.
Originally Posted by sanzard
Why are you locking up this guy for 10 years when he's already signed through 2013? Do the Rockies even remember signing Todd Helton or Mike Hampton?
Long term deals in baseball are stupid. This is just like the Mauer signing, great for publicity but bad baseball decision. -
best SS in baseball?
really now.
Hanley Ramirez says hi.
Higher career BA, OBP, OPS, OPS+.
Yes Tulo is a better defensive player. But i'll take hanrams bat + speed over tulo's D. -
The Rockies signing Tulo to a 10 year deal is great....if you're a Yankee fan. I can see it now. Three years down the road, Jeter retires, Yanks trade for Tulo and require the Rockies to pay 80% of the remaining contract.
-
How are they going to keep Cargo/Ubaldo if they are spending a quarter of their payroll on one guy?
They simply won't have the funds to do it. -
I'm baffled by the statement that he won't hit .336 again, as if that's an argument not to sign him. For starters, what evidence is there that it won't happen again. He's young, he works hard, he loves the game and he's obviously comfortable as a hitter in Coors Field. It seems that if past performance is any indication of future performance he will indeed hit .336 again. Even if he doesn't, let's say he stays in the .315 to .330 range, is that a problem? He is an all a around fine player. One that any team would want on the squad for a long time. He's leader, a good clubhouse guy, basically a franchise type player. I for one really don't care if someone wants to argue that Ramirez is better, the Rockies have Tulo, not Ramirez. They should do what they need to to keep him.
I would think the Rockies have thought about signing Cargo and Ubaldo in conjunction with signing Tulo, I guess we'll see. The problem with Cargo is that Boras is his agent, so he will probably be gone when he becomes a free agent anyway. -
I have no doubt that he's a hard worker or that he loves the game, but he won't hit .336 again because he doesn't walk enough and he had an unsustainable .384 BABIP last year. He swings at everything, so pitchers don't have to worry about throwing him strikes. Its not an argument not to sign him, but his value is at an all-time high right now. The Rockies know this and Boras knows this. He has one cheap year left before he hits arbitration, so sign him after next year when his numbers come down a little bit and they don't have to pay him as much. He's still going to be a good player, but 2010 is probably going to be his career year unless he starts walking more.
Originally Posted by Willywoo
I'm baffled by the statement that he won't hit .336 again, as if that's an argument not to sign him. For starters, what evidence is there that it won't happen again. He's young, he works hard, he loves the game and he's obviously comfortable as a hitter in Coors Field. It seems that if past performance is any indication of future performance he will indeed hit .336 again. Even if he doesn't, let's say he stays in the .315 to .330 range, is that a problem? He is an all a around fine player. One that any team would want on the squad for a long time. He's leader, a good clubhouse guy, basically a franchise type player. I for one really don't care if someone wants to argue that Ramirez is better, the Rockies have Tulo, not Ramirez. They should do what they need to to keep him.
I would think the Rockies have thought about signing Cargo and Ubaldo in conjunction with signing Tulo, I guess we'll see. The problem with Cargo is that Boras is his agent, so he will probably be gone when he becomes a free agent anyway. -
Boras is Cargo's agent not Tulo.
I guess we'll see if his value is at an all time high. I disagree. You say he doesn't walk enough and swings at everything, yet he still hit .336. I can't wait until he matures and becomes a more disciplined hitter. -
This is nowhere near as bad as the Phillies extending Howard when he had 2 years left, but it's still confusing. 10 years 160 is not significantly less than what he would get if he were a free agent right now. If baseball were the same as it was 5 years ago I could see him pulling down 200+ easily, but teams are not making it rain like they used to. I don't think he or anyone (insane and not done by a GM, Arod deal excluded) could crack 180 on the open market. Most importantly, though, couldn't they have given him this same deal next year or the year after that or maybe even the year after that? Just seems like they're needlessly taking on risk with little benefit.
That said, his skill, age and position make him easily a top 5 long-term value in baseball along with Longoria and Felix and then some combination of Hanley, Zimmerman, Votto and whoever else you want to throw in there. -
He's going to mature, but there's no guarantee his plate discipline improves. His plate discipline actually regressed from 2009 to 2010, and I can't imagine he'll be too eager to change his approach after the season he just had. He won't BABIP .384 forever, so he's going to need to start being more selective. Whether or not he has that ability is yet to be seen.
-
The first few years of the contract Helton produced but the last 5 years he has not produced what he did earlier in his career. His BA/OBP were still good (prior to this last year) but power #s have been 2nd basemen like.
Originally Posted by Willywoo
I have trouble understanding this post. What was wrong with the Helton contracts? Hampton was obviously a mistake. Why are long term contracts stupid or bad for baseball? Especially if Tulo wants to be a marketable figure and put down some roots in Colorado.
I think long term contracts are stupid because while you normally get good production the first say 3-5 years of deal, the player starts declining at the back end of the deal and your team is stuck with a huge portion of your payroll on a player who isn't getting it done.
Personally I think Tulo is an overrated player who has benefited from playing in a hitters park. Just look at his career home/away splits. Plus he has a tendency to get hurt. -
I don't love this contract but Tulo's contract and Helton's contract are two very different things. Tulo gives you premium defensive/offense at a defensive position where as Helton was a great hitter at a replaceable position.
Originally Posted by sanzard
The first few years of the contract Helton produced but the last 5 years he has not produced what he did earlier in his career. His BA/OBP were still good (prior to this last year) but power #s have been 2nd basemen like.
I think long term contracts are stupid because while you normally get good production the first say 3-5 years of deal, the player starts declining at the back end of the deal and your team is stuck with a huge portion of your payroll on a player who isn't getting it done.
Personally I think Tulo is an overrated player who has benefited from playing in a hitters park. Just look at his career home/away splits. Plus he has a tendency to get hurt.
Also, if the Rockies figure that Tulo will make more than $20m in his 30-35 years then this is a pretty good contract because they're factoring future inflation into the contract. $20m now could easily be $28-30m in seven years. Again, I didn't think this deal had to be done but its not at all like the Howard extension and should work out just fine for the Rockies. -
[X] hate that piece of crap
[X] wish he was on my team and only saying the above because of it










