Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
Haha, I guess that explains the mickey.
-
guys on a beam is an optical illusion, think they were ony a few feet off the floor they were building.
-
Originally Posted by SluggerWV
that is just so wrong it's making me dizzy sitting even though I'm sitting down
mbn not to get vertigo

this is the first pic that came up when I googled historic wtf
just realized it's from the same page as the op's pic
Jaybums grandma and friends airing out jaybums grandpas mattress?? -
LOL
Edited By: Dyzalot Sep 17th, 2011 at 01:40 AM
My initial thought to that picture was they were showing off their daughter's virgin blood from her consumating her new marriage or something like that. -
I just assumed first pyramid. Oh well.
-
i think thats the rockefeller building no? and yeah theyd prob fall to their deaths
-
Edited By: threeven Sep 17th, 2011 at 02:39 AM
Umm, Im pretty sure it isn't. It is a very famous photo.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunchti...p_a_Skyscraper
and yeah it looks high up compared to the rest of the buildings,the picture was taken on the 69th floor of what is still one of the tallest buildings in NY and the picture was taken in 1932 -
the last couple seem believeable because the dude appears around the same level as one of the other buildings. and this building might be taller but from the original pic it looks like it's a mile high.
Edited By: Ozzie Sep 17th, 2011 at 02:55 AM -
Originally Posted by Ozzie
the last couple seem believeable because the dude appears around the same level as one of the other buildings. and this building might be taller but from the original pic it looks like it's a mile high.

this is the Rockefeller building around the time they were working on it -
come on lefty, you cant tell me you dont notice a difference between the first two pics slugger posted and the last two(4 now) with how the background buildings look.
-
Originally Posted by LeftyMark
This is me last month on the ESB. Buildings look pretty small down there.

they look small when compared to the magnitude of your excellence sir
didn't mean to imply that all of these pics were from the same buildingOriginally Posted by Ozzie
come on lefty, you cant tell me you dont notice a difference between the first two pics slugger posted and the last two(4 now) with how the background buildings look.
only the one with them eating lunch and "taking a nap" (though that seems staged to me, but not faked) are from the Rockefeller construction as far as I can tell
just thought the other pics were interesting -
I really didn't compare the pictures tbh because I've seen them so many times. We went to the top of that building and they have that scene set up in the lobby so you can get your picture taken sitting on a beam with that background. I just assumed the original was real or they wouldn't be doing that.
-
maybe it's some kind of photography trick of perception but the building looks 2-3x as big as many of the surrounding ones here. but in the pics from the beams it looks like it's at least 10x higher than any other.
-
if the pic was taken with the photographer's back to the river (left to right in the in above pic like from 11 o'clock to 4 o'clock) then the pics in the background would have all been substantially smaller
Originally Posted by Ozzie
maybe it's some kind of photography trick of perception but the building looks 2-3x as big as many of the surrounding ones here. but in the pics from the beams it looks like it's at least 10x higher than any other.
how about this angle


11/13/1929-New York: Jack Reilly, intrepid photographer, precariously perched from the 72 story of the world's tallest building, the 74 story Bank of Manhattan.
A man holds onto a girder and waves from the construction site of the Empire State Building. June 10, 1930 -
Similar Threads
- 11 Replies
-
0 Replies
*Featured historic post* 7-22-2007 - Annette posts HH of winning a 180 man on PS blind
By jesterwords in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Sep 16th, 2009, 09:51 AM - 18 Replies
- 35 Replies
































