[x]
  1. lawlz

    Homophobic Men Most Aroused by Gay Male Porn
    Homophobia Associated with Penis Arousal to Male on Male Sex

    cliffs notes: "For gay male sex, however, only the homophobic men showed heightened penis arousal."
    Edited By: nowapowa Dec 6th, 2011 at 12:14 PM
  2. I must love gheys b/c mm porn never does it for me.

    wait, what?
  3. only if yr homophobic apparently. note that it doesn't say that all hetero men are aroused by gay porn, just teh homophobez.
    Thread Starter
  4.  
    Originally Posted by nowapowa View Post

    note that it doesn't say that all hetero men are aroused by gay porn, just teh homophobez.


    it doesn't even say that. not every homophobic person was aroused by gay sex but everyone that was aroused by gay sex was classified as homophobic based on their described level of comfort to the questions in the study.
    Edited By: qjuice14 Dec 6th, 2011 at 07:46 AM
     
  5. First off I'd like to say, Sick story bro. Think about the point of this guys article, "hey guys I just did some tests on people who claim to hate gay people, but it turns out they actually don't, and they are actually very turned on by watching intimate gay sessions." Like what is he trying to prove? People who claim to hate gays are actually lying? Just seems like a pretty redundant/pointless test.

    IMO if you can say something like that then its just as easy to say gay people are just faking that they are gay, and that they are actually just lying when they say they like pounding butts/scissor fighting on the reg, but they keep doing it to put on a front.

    If I were to take a shot in the dark I would say the author of this article is gay, and is trying to show people that folks need to be more open and understanding of gays, which is perfectly reasonable, but if people are accepting the fact that its socially acceptable to be gay, shouldnt people be more understanding of homophobic views as well?

    I am no homophobe, but I just think that it is very stupid for a homosexual to be able to say someone is very dumb/ignorant for being a homophobic, when its just the way a person is. Shouldnt homophobes be loved for who they are too?
     
  6. [ ] shocking

    the closet is a sad, sad place

     
    Originally Posted by silkhandlez View Post

    First off I'd like to say, Sick story bro. Think about the point of this guys article, "hey guys I just did some tests on people who claim to hate gay people, but it turns out they actually don't, and they are actually very turned on by watching intimate gay sessions." Like what is he trying to prove? People who claim to hate gays are actually lying? Just seems like a pretty redundant/pointless test.

    IMO if you can say something like that then its just as easy to say gay people are just faking that they are gay, and that they are actually just lying when they say they like pounding butts/scissor fighting on the reg, but they keep doing it to put on a front.

    If I were to take a shot in the dark I would say the author of this article is gay, and is trying to show people that folks need to be more open and understanding of gays, which is perfectly reasonable, but if people are accepting the fact that its socially acceptable to be gay, shouldnt people be more understanding of homophobic views as well?

    I am no homophobe, but I just think that it is very stupid for a homosexual to be able to say someone is very dumb/ignorant for being a homophobic, when its just the way a person is. Shouldnt homophobes be loved for who they are too?

  7.  
    Originally Posted by silkhandlez View Post

    First off I'd like to say, Sick story bro. Think about the point of this guys article, "hey guys I just did some tests on people who claim to hate gay people, but it turns out they actually don't, and they are actually very turned on by watching intimate gay sessions." Like what is he trying to prove? People who claim to hate gays are actually lying? Just seems like a pretty redundant/pointless test.

    IMO if you can say something like that then its just as easy to say gay people are just faking that they are gay, and that they are actually just lying when they say they like pounding butts/scissor fighting on the reg, but they keep doing it to put on a front.

    If I were to take a shot in the dark I would say the author of this article is gay, and is trying to show people that folks need to be more open and understanding of gays, which is perfectly reasonable, but if people are accepting the fact that its socially acceptable to be gay, shouldnt people be more understanding of homophobic views as well?

    I am no homophobe, but I just think that it is very stupid for a homosexual to be able to say someone is very dumb/ignorant for being a homophobic, when its just the way a person is. Shouldnt homophobes be loved for who they are too?

    Now that's one hell of a rant... I guess you think racists and sexists should just be accepted too. I mean it's just who they are...
    Edited By: Realbigfish4 Dec 6th, 2011 at 07:57 AM
  8.  
    Originally Posted by Realbigfish4 View Post

    Now that's one hell of a rant... I guess you think racists and sexists should just be accepted too. I mean it's just who they are...

    don't forget pedophiles
  9.  
    Originally Posted by Realbigfish4 View Post

    Now that's one hell of a rant... I guess you think racists and sexists should just be accepted too. I mean it's just who they are...

    Theoretically speaking.... Yes. Who's to say whats right and whats wrong? It all boils down to how you were brought up, and each person is different.
     
  10.  
    Originally Posted by silkhandlez View Post

    Theoretically speaking.... Yes. Who's to say whats right and whats wrong? It all boils down to how you were brought up, and each person is different.

    So allowing hate is ok? You cant really mean that
  11.  
    Originally Posted by silkhandlez View Post

    Theoretically speaking.... Yes. Who's to say whats right and whats wrong? It all boils down to how you were brought up, and each person is different.


    society is to say what is right and wrong, if your actions/behaviors are hurting other people
     
  12.  
    Originally Posted by Realbigfish4 View Post

    So allowing hate is ok? You cant really mean that

    I don't think theres any reason to allow hate, I certainly don't hate anyone or anything.. But I am in no position to judge someone who does.. In the same way you shouldnt judge someone for being gay..
     
  13.  
    Originally Posted by silkhandlez View Post

    I don't think theres any reason to allow hate, I certainly don't hate anyone or anything.. But I am in no position to judge someone who does.. In the same way you shouldnt judge someone for being gay..

    So if a small town, or even a state, wants to segregate schools, reinstate slavery, reinstate the rule of thumb, limit voting rights to white land owners, beat and murder gays, etc. etc. the rest of America should just turn a blind eye b/c we as a society shouldnt judge them for their beliefs?

    I get what you're trying to say, but its foolish. The idea that we shouldnt judge people on their beliefs or way of live has a line and hate crosses it.
  14.  
    Originally Posted by silkhandlez View Post

    First off I'd like to say, Sick story bro. Think about the point of this guys article, "hey guys I just did some tests on people who claim to hate gay people, but it turns out they actually don't, and they are actually very turned on by watching intimate gay sessions." Like what is he trying to prove? People who claim to hate gays are actually lying? Just seems like a pretty redundant/pointless test.

    IMO if you can say something like that then its just as easy to say gay people are just faking that they are gay, and that they are actually just lying when they say they like pounding butts/scissor fighting on the reg, but they keep doing it to put on a front.

    If I were to take a shot in the dark I would say the author of this article is gay, and is trying to show people that folks need to be more open and understanding of gays, which is perfectly reasonable, but if people are accepting the fact that its socially acceptable to be gay, shouldnt people be more understanding of homophobic views as well?

    I am no homophobe, but I just think that it is very stupid for a homosexual to be able to say someone is very dumb/ignorant for being a homophobic, when its just the way a person is. Shouldnt homophobes be loved for who they are too?

    Dude
  15. heh, circumference
  16.  
    Originally Posted by silkhandlez View Post

    I don't think theres any reason to allow hate, I certainly don't hate anyone or anything.. But I am in no position to judge someone who does.. In the same way you shouldnt judge someone for being gay..


    You should read this:



    or atleast watch this:

     
  17.  
    Originally Posted by Realbigfish4 View Post

    So if a small town, or even a state, wants to segregate schools, reinstate slavery, reinstate the rule of thumb, limit voting rights to white land owners, beat and murder gays, etc. etc. the rest of America should just turn a blind eye b/c we as a society shouldnt judge them for their beliefs?

    I get what you're trying to say, but its foolish. The idea that we shouldnt judge people on their beliefs or way of live has a line and hate crosses it.

    NO! Because that is against the law, it would never happen, and the constitution protects people from things like that happening.. But the constitution also gives you the freedom of speech. So in my opinion you are not in the wrong for thinking the way you do... I'm not saying its ok to go out and kill people and whatever else you said, I am simply saying people are set their certain ways and don't know any better. But who is anyone to tell them what they think is wrong.. If you truely hate gays you truely hate gays. I guess what I am trying to say is I wont dislike a person because they are gay, I wont dislike a person if they are racist, I wont dislike a person if they are sexest, I will dislike a person if I think they are a complete shit bag donk because they have ripped me off or hurt me, stabbed me in the back etc. We are obviously going to agree on disagreeing no matter what either of us say, your not going to make me think the way you think, and I'm not going to make you think the way I think.
     
  18. I guess ingnorance truly is bliss in your case. Im just glad the majority of society doesnt think as you do.
  19. so basically you're saying, you have no problem with people who hurt others, as long as you aren't one of the others he/she is hurting. You're a swell guy.
  20.  
    Originally Posted by silkhandlez View Post

    NO! Because that is against the law, it would never happen, and the constitution protects people from things like that happening.. But the constitution also gives you the freedom of speech. So in my opinion you are not in the wrong for thinking the way you do... I'm not saying its ok to go out and kill people and whatever else you said, I am simply saying people are set their certain ways and don't know any better. But who is anyone to tell them what they think is wrong.. If you truely hate gays you truely hate gays. I guess what I am trying to say is I wont dislike a person because they are gay, I wont dislike a person if they are racist, I wont dislike a person if they are sexest, I will dislike a person if I think they are a complete shit bag donk because they have ripped me off or hurt me, stabbed me in the back etc. We are obviously going to agree on disagreeing no matter what either of us say, your not going to make me think the way you think, and I'm not going to make you think the way I think.

    You can't have it both ways. If freedom of speech gives people the right to think or say hateful things then freedom of speech also gives us the right to speak out against those people and shame them if we wish.
     3
  21.  
    Originally Posted by ScottBrewr99 View Post

    so basically you're saying, you have no problem with people who hurt others, as long as you aren't one of the others he/she is hurting. You're a swell guy.

    No, the op was an article basically saying that homophobes are actually into gay porn... I thought it was a pointless study, and I stated that if homophobes can fake being homophobes, how do we know gays arent faking being gays. I then began to go off topic a bit and talk about how some gay people think everyone is just out to get them and that people should be more understanding of them... (which is true) When I see two men getting sexual in public it makes my stomache turn, and i think its gross, but at the same time I dont think its wrong for them to do... But if someone does... What makes that wrong... I think its just human nature, some people have instincts to really hate someone that is doing something they dont like. Kind of like you guys not agreeing with what I am saying.

    Also scott, I never said that I'm fine with it going down with others as long as it's not me, if and when someone hurts me with insults because I have red hair or something, I'm obv gonna think the guys a prick, but not really going too think much of it because thats just the way he thinks, so I'll let him think it. Because thats what he thinks, he is pre exposed to hating people with red hair, just like gay people are pre exposed to being gay, and homophobes are pre exposed to not liking gays...

    Whats right and wrong has changed many times throughout the years, we used to own slaves for christ sakes, you think back then they thought that was the wrong thing to do? Think about 6 generations from now what if in that time they do away with jails in the United States. At first there are gonna be people that really think they should still have jails, but as the years go on and more generations come, people would begin to think that the people who think jails are necessary are going to be looked at like they are fools, because the new generation grew up without jails, so they are going to think holding someone in a cell the same way we think about slavery.

    I'm done for the night, the tylonel pm is crushing my brain and I keep forgetting the points I am trying to make.. But basically I understand that there are many different things that people believe in, and I dont think its as simple as saying "oh that person is wrong for thinking this".
     
  22. Edited By: FenwayKing Dec 6th, 2011 at 10:34 AM
    1
  23.  
    Originally Posted by FenwayKing View Post


    lol +16
     
  24.  
    Originally Posted by silkhandlez View Post

    Theoretically speaking.... Yes. Who's to say whats right and whats wrong? It all boils down to how you were brought up, and each person is different.


    Is that the theory where your values mean absolutely nothing because everything you think is only what was allowed in your immediate surroundings as a child? Grow a conscience and think for yourself.
    Thread Starter
  25.  
    Originally Posted by FenwayKing View Post

    LAWLZ
  26.  
    Originally Posted by FenwayKing View Post

    LAWLZ
  27.  
    Originally Posted by qjuice14 View Post

    it doesn't even say that. not every homophobic person was aroused by gay sex but everyone that was aroused by gay sex was classified as homophobic based on their described level of comfort to the questions in the study.

    "For gay male sex, however, only the homophobic men showed heightened penis arousal.

    Heterosexual men with the most anti-gay attitudes, when asked, reported not being sexually aroused by gay male sex videos. But, their penises reported otherwise."

    I didn't word it properly but pretty sure it says ALL the homophobes got aroused by gay sex porn.

     
    Originally Posted by Oh Rale View Post

    LAWLZ

    ^^^^
    Thread Starter
  28.  
    Originally Posted by FenwayKing View Post

    Lol
  29. Bunch of legal rationalization to justify something that is only affecting two percent of the people. I understand that there are a number of people that deviate from the norm, being that 98 percent of people are attracted to the opposite sex. And that the gays want to be able to do what ever they want whenever they want, with out a stigma being attached to it.

    Behavior is not the same as race and reality is we are all of the same race...the human race. The acceptance of certain behaviors are determined by the society that they occur within. Obviously what our society as a whole is willing see as acceptable behavior has changed. So be it. The only question is where will common sense kick in and a line is drawn.

    You know that there are pedophiles at this moment, probably professional, intelligent people, wondering what they can do to legitimize their behavior. After all that is another group who sees what they do as completely normal...for them. How long before a pedophile version of Barney Frank is on the hill pushing for little kids to have the right to consent...laugh if you wish or be sick to your stomach like me...but do not be surprised. On the other hand maybe this is as far as sexual deviates will go...I hope so.

    After all 2 percent of the population (homosexuals) has changed the perspective of this country radically over the last 20 years....20 years ago no one would have believed what is going on now. And 20 years from now it will probably be worse , from my perspective, at the rate we are going.

    I could care less what these people do..unless it directly impacts myself or my family. Just do not ask me do pretend it is normal behavior, because it is not even if they do get married...lol.
  30.  
    Originally Posted by Glo4m View Post

    Bunch of legal rationalization to justify something that is only affecting two percent of the people. I understand that there are a number of people that deviate from the norm, being that 98 percent of people are attracted to the opposite sex. And that the gays want to be able to do what ever they want whenever they want, with out a stigma being attached to it.

    Behavior is not the same as race and reality is we are all of the same race...the human race. The acceptance of certain behaviors are determined by the society that they occur within. Obviously what our society as a whole is willing see as acceptable behavior has changed. So be it. The only question is where will common sense kick in and a line is drawn.

    You know that there are pedophiles at this moment, probably professional, intelligent people, wondering what they can do to legitimize their behavior. After all that is another group who sees what they do as completely normal...for them. How long before a pedophile version of Barney Frank is on the hill pushing for little kids to have the right to consent...laugh if you wish or be sick to your stomach like me...but do not be surprised. On the other hand maybe this is as far as sexual deviates will go...I hope so.

    After all 2 percent of the population (homosexuals) has changed the perspective of this country radically over the last 20 years....20 years ago no one would have believed what is going on now. And 20 years from now it will probably be worse , from my perspective, at the rate we are going.

    I could care less what these people do..unless it directly impacts myself or my family. Just do not ask me do pretend it is normal behavior, because it is not even if they do get married...lol.

    The only "line" that should be drawn with human behavior is the line that prevents you from hurting someone else. If you can't see why that's the difference between homosexuality and pedophilia then maybe it is you that isn't normal.
     3

Similar Threads