Originally Posted by kellykip

Wait, so if you have NO CHOICE, and have to fuck one of 2 dogs - same type of dog, size, hair color. 1 is male, 1 is female.

You honestly telling me you aren't gonna fuck the female dog every time in that scenario?

if I had a choice male or female, I'd obv take the female, but if its not like I would say no to male but yes to female.

 

Originally Posted by XXEDPXX

why wouldnt the second question be if you had to cut off your own finger?

no to all

I thought someone might ask this. Personally, I felt that this scenario was a more interesting question, psychologically, than the more traditional one of it being your own finger, since the other two hypoetheticals both deal with how willing you are to do something that sucks for you, yourself, whereas, that one deals with your ethics/morals in terms of doing something that sucks for someone other than you, that you caused to happen. I think for some people, #2 might actually be the worst of the 3 scenarios. I also think that a lot of people will have trouble understanding how anyone could possibly think #2 is the worst. Which I enjoy, since I like to see which people have difficulty understanding certain ethics/viewpoints. Which is why I threw that one in there.

i wouldnt even consider 3. there is no thinking about it. none of these are really equal to the reward. a better scenario for 3 would be if you had to fuck a 900 pound women or some shit like that. nobody except some sick fuck is gonna screw a dog for anything. a better hypothetical scenario for the 2nd question would be if you had to cut off your own finger. a selfish person wuld have no problem cutting off someone elses plus its just easier to say that so you wont get an accurate answer. theres probably tons of people that will say #2 but they wouldnt actually go through with it. here on an internet forum its easy though to just be like yeah, ill cut someone elses finger off. maybe the point of question #2 is to gauge the selfishness of certain individuals but i doubt thats what you were doing.

edit: i guess that was the point. the other disputes about it being an easy answer still stand though

 

Originally Posted by XXEDPXX

i wouldnt even consider 3. there is no thinking about it. none of these are really equal to the reward. a better scenario for 3 would be if you had to fuck a 900 pound women or some shit like that. nobody except some sick fuck is gonna screw a dog for anything. a better hypothetical scenario for the 2nd question would be if you had to cut off your own finger. a selfish person wuld have no problem cutting off someone elses plus its just easier to say that so you wont get an accurate answer. theres probably tons of people that will say #2 but they wouldnt actually go through with it. here on an internet forum its easy though to just be like yeah, ill cut someone elses finger off. maybe the point of question #2 is to gauge the selfishness of certain individuals but i doubt thats what you were doing.

+1

Yeah I dont think I could do any of these just to have sex with my dreamgirl. I am pretty satisfied with the list I have had so far. I honestly dont think I could do these, maybe more for money than a girl.

1. i dont thin i could do it, but id try.

2. lol, for sure, no problem.

3. no fkn way

 

Originally Posted by bfactor

It's sort of like, if there was a hypothetical where you had to fuck a dude, but you get to choose whether to guy is a good looking guy, or a bad looking guy, it seems in some ways like it might be "gayer" if you request it to be a good looking guy, than if you request a bad looking guy. Sort of like, if you really hate eggplant, then, you might actually hate eating perfectly prepared eggplant, where the chef did a good job of bringing out the eggplant flavors to their fullest extent, since it just intensifies how strong the thing you dislike would be, and might actually hate a "bad" eggplant dish less than a "good" eggplant dish. It's hard for me to explain, but, I honestly think I would feel even weirder/more awkward if the dog was female, than if it was male.

This actually makes sense - it would definitely be gayer to prefer to bang George Clooney over George Karl. As soon as you are showing a preference, you are sexualizing it instead of it just being a scenario where you have no free will. But with the dogs, I would equate it to picking a cocker spaniel female over a boxer female, not picking a female over a male. Just 2 different ways at looking at it, I guess.

 

Originally Posted by kellykip

This actually makes sense - it would definitely be gayer to prefer to bang George Clooney over George Karl. As soon as you are showing a preference, you are sexualizing it instead of it just being a scenario where you have no free will. But with the dogs, I would equate it to picking a cocker spaniel female over a boxer female, not picking a female over a male. Just 2 different ways at looking at it, I guess.

Yea, the "sexualizing it" thing in the hot/ugly guy scenario is basically what I meant for the male vs female dog thing, as far as why I felt it might be worse to pick female, but, I also see what you are saying in terms of not even viewing it that way and making it strictly be a physiological/comfort type of thing of like the same way some breeds would be even more severely unpleasant to fuck probly, in terms of non-sexualized aspects of it even.

 

Originally Posted by Camronius

if i said yes, then you would know, and that goes against your post where you said nobody would know. no?

Lol, true

 

Originally Posted by Bonestein

This is so fucked up. Bfactor's gimmick getting old.

I realize that it probably seems to some people like I just intentionally try to make a lot of fucked up posts, just to keep up a reputation of making a lot of fucked up posts or something, but I honestly swear this just isn't the case at all. I simply really genuinely enjoy asking about and/or talking about fucked up shit. It's honestly enjoy the discussion of this type of stuff itself. I think some other people do too, but some people don't, and those who don't can't understand how/why the people who do enjoy it enjoy it, so, they assume that they must not enjoy the actual discussion, and are just doing it to do a "gimmick". This simply isn't the case though. The reason I make a lot of fucked up threads, is simply because I actually enjoy the discussions of fucked up shit, itself. Nothing more, nothing less. Obviously you don't believe that, but, it's actually the truth.

 

Originally Posted by XXEDPXX

so basically you're trying to figure out the most fucked up OT'ers. the thing is though anybody that would actually fuck a dog would never admit it. its just too absurd of a question to try and get a real response from people. the only yes you'll get is someone joking around so really whats the point?

I actually just don't happen to agree with your hypothesis. I think that there are people who are willing to answer this honestly (and, as far as the thing about answering the thread defeating the anonymity of fucking the dog from the dog scenario, this isn't really true, since a large percentage of OTers on here are anonymous, like, nobody knows who they are in real life, so, they can actually answer the question honestly without fear of people who they know in real life knowing that they'd be willing/not willing to do x things.) and I don't think the only yes responses are all jokes. Maybe some are, but, I think the majority would be honest answers. Also, I think there is a pretty big difference between a person admitting that they'd fuck a dog just simply because they actually wanted to fuck it, compared to admitting they'd fuck a dog, but not enjoy it/want to, but simply do it because they were forced to in order to get something else, i.e. a prize of some sort, like in the hypothetical of this thread. I agree that very few people in the former scenario would admit that, if especially if they weren't answering anonymously, but, I think lots of people would be willing to answer the latter scenario honestly, since, they aren't admitting they WANT to fuck dogs, rather, they're just admitting they'd be willing to do it, begrudgingly, to get to attain something else, in trade for it. Like, even in real life asking this question face-to-face, I think there are some people who would answer yes to question 3, and not in a joking manner, and not feel overly embarrassed about it either, since they technically wouldn't actually be saying they would want to fuck a dog, if you see the difference.

yeah, well

Try to answer some replies and allow yourself no more than 20 words.

I'd slice you to pieces to sleep with that zelda ass girl B.

oh ffs ed

it's called your "all-time dream girl," not "some hot chick from studyhall you're afraid to talk to." these are girls you wouldn't be able to get a word into much less your nut, and you get to dictate their emotions on top of it.

no one gives a shit, or even remotely believes you that you have a shot at any of our dream girls. so yeah, pass me scruffy because I'm making a run on 2003 jessica alba.

exactly.