[x]
  1.  
    Originally Posted by ginwilly View Post

    STD, I don't think Jeff or anyone is suggesting we go to war over this. The plan I keep hearing is enforce a no fly zone so the crazy fucker won't open fire over crowds. If our government ever reached the point where they opened fire on the daily wackos on Pennsylvania Ave I would hope another government would try to prevent it from happening again.

    I think everyone is trying to figure out a way to threaten him into leaving, but it's not going to happen. We can't even think about more empty threats from the US, North Korea would go nuts. If we do make these threats we better be willing to shoot people out of the sky, because the crazy fucker is going to call any bluff.

    A good reason for us to just stay the fuck out of this is it's just the beginning over there and no way can we get involved in all of them, especially when each new uprising may be worse than the last.

    Waiting until the Saudi Sheiks start panicking so we can make them our bitches instead of the opposite is a viable option too.

    well enforcing a no fly zone is very similar to a declaration of war. Libya/gaddafhi might not technically declare war on us if a no fly zone was instituted because he knows thats a war he can't win, but we would certainly become enemies.

    Also this no fly zone might only serve to prolong the war. (it will neutralize gaddafhis air superiority, which would make it more difficult for him to end the uprising) GRANTEd it could also speed up the process if the rebels are the winning side.
  2. @emcee21
    woah, woah, woah
    it was a friendly poke in the ribs; just b/c i made a few posts that were not glib and snarky doesnt mean im not glib and snarky

    @Willywoo
    lol, save the cynicism for court, counsellor

    @ginwilly
    gtfo with the appeal to another govt intervening in our affairs, whatever the case
    meaningless argumentative technique
  3. Arabs killing Arabs....Duh "Winning"
  4.  
    Originally Posted by Z-Fresh View Post

    When a country's citizens rise up on their own to overthrow a dictator for democracy and ask the US for help is when we should take part IMO.

    orrrrr....
    Perhaps you just dont hear the screams of the other people begging us for help through the media?
    How many exactly does it take to become ok with msnbc?
    Or does a democrat just have to be in office?



    The hard hitting unpopular questions people should be just asking.
  5. Bout tree fiddy
  6. Interesting thread

    Stay away. If the world wants to get involved have the international community do it. We shouldn't be shooting down planes on our own--intl community maybe

    The US should have people on the ground, CIA I'd imagine having influence in a new regime that will be friendly to our interest, style of government is overrated.

    Think it was saxman who made good points about the Middle East/Arab world being very tribal. That is extremely important to understanding what styles of government will work. Plus doubt Lybia has a strong middle class and the other qualities that make for a strong democracy. Lots of good points in this thread from people I often disagree with (usually agree with sax).
  7. A no fly zone is needed. Its what a lot of Libyans seem to want. However they do not want a US or any other military invading their country. Implement a no fly zone and help out with humanitarian aid, thats what they need. Theres no doubt the US already has people on the ground like the UK had (that turned out loltastically).

    Edit: also some1 posted a pic claiming Hugo Chavez was responsible for genocide, links to evidence please? I don't think Chavez should still be in power but i've never heard about him committing genocide.
    Edited By: Clerk Mar 10th, 2011 at 01:31 PM
  8. The Colombian president accused Chavez of genocide because they claim they had evidence Venezuela gave money to a rebel group but that was a long time ago, couple years.

    but really, socialism-genocide. Is there a difference?
  9.  
    Originally Posted by Z-Fresh View Post

    When a country's citizens rise up on their own to overthrow a dictator for democracy and ask the US for help is when we should take part IMO.

    how many of their citizens? Do we need to go in and take a poll? Robert Heinlein once said a very smart thing, you can't be given freedom you must earn it or you will be unable to keep it. Look at all the "success" stories of us going in and "freeing" a people from a bad regime. Not one of those countries is what you would call stable, some decades later.
     
  10.  
    Originally Posted by zeppelinzoso16 View Post


    but really, socialism-genocide. Is there a difference?

    Obv not. I could'nt name 1 single time when a capitalist country has been accused of anything similar.
  11.  
    Originally Posted by saxman View Post

    We're trying to impose modern western standards on people that are 100 or more years behind us in terms of development. It's just fucktarded.

    lol cause we haven't been a democracy for almost 300 years. I understand your point but you ain't helping yourself.

     
    Originally Posted by SILKY JOHNSON View Post

    Arabs killing Arabs....Duh "Winning"

    check a map
     
  12. Libya may be Northern Africa but they are Arab. They are Sunni Muslim, speak Arabic, have some islamic law, "Arab nationalism", and uhh have Arab in the name of their country. It is an Arab state

    Edit: since some people don't know Iran & Turkey are not Arab states. Both have Arab minorities that are discriminated against.
    Edited By: Zeppelin Mar 10th, 2011 at 02:43 PM
  13. A no fly zone won't prevent the kidnaps, tourture and execution. We should not be invading a third country at this time. Why should American lives be lost and billions spent on this civil dispute? It's horrible but so is so much in this world. It's time to fix america. Entering another battle field will only perpetuate our fall and cause further instability to an unstable region.

    War is never easy and rarely right.
    Edited By: TheFirm53 Mar 10th, 2011 at 03:13 PM
  14. Relax guy. The david cameron is sending british jets in... oh wait, we don't have any jets anymore.


  15. Ron Paul ftw
  16. Ron Paul nailed it
  17. Always enjoy listening to Paul talk foreign policy
  18.  
    Originally Posted by saxman View Post

    Jeff - are they not discussing a no fly zone?

    Yup, I'm sure he'll comply!
    Edited By: RUBINH Mar 10th, 2011 at 09:02 PM
    Reason: Just like the "no bombing your own citizens" rule he's complied with thus-far.
  19.  
    Originally Posted by penileinfection View Post

    well enforcing a no fly zone is very similar to a declaration of war. Libya/gaddafhi might not technically declare war on us if a no fly zone was instituted because he knows thats a war he can't win, but we would certainly become enemies.

    Also this no fly zone might only serve to prolong the war. (it will neutralize gaddafhis air superiority, which would make it more difficult for him to end the uprising) GRANTEd it could also speed up the process if the rebels are the winning side.

    lol is this guy for real? no, imposing a no fly zone is not like a war. Oh but quadaffi might get upset and declare war on us? Oh Noes! wtf is he going to do? lol what a joke. Be careful, that dicator on the run in his own country is going to...uh...hmm.

    and the no fly zone could prolong the war because he couldn't kill his people faster. good point? I agree! lol tf?

    and holy shit ron paul is a fucking retard.

    Edited By: norcaljeff Mar 11th, 2011 at 12:35 AM
    Thread Starter
  20. U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates was cautious on this option (no fly-zone), warning the U.S. Congress that a no-fly zone would have to begin with an attack on Libya’s air defenses and would require "a big operation in a big country."

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/03/wo...tary.html?_r=1

    Secretary of Defense opinion>ncj opinion imo
    Edited By: LuckyWilbury Mar 11th, 2011 at 12:45 AM
  21.  
    Originally Posted by Clerk View Post

    Obv not. I could'nt name 1 single time when a capitalist country has been accused of anything similar.

    well, we did drop a few bombs and some countries would put it in the same light. I wouldn't though ftr.
  22. we could do it with planes off the coast and ships.

    wsj:

    Unlike in the Balkans and Iraq, Libya's most populated cities and airbases are situated near its coastline, with most located less than 10 miles from the shore. In addition, due to the fracturing of the Libyan military, Gadhafi's forces have limited capability to retaliate. Thus it may be possible to enforce a no-fly zone without putting a single coalition plane directly over Libyan territory.
    This approach would use precision-guided weapons to keep U.S. and allied planes out of range of Libya's air force and air defenses.

    Rather than putting combat air patrols over Libya, it would employ ships and aircraft operating off the coast. Libyan aircraft violating the no-fly zone could be intercepted using ships armed with SM-2 surface-to-air missiles and fighter aircraft armed with AIM-120 air-to-air missiles, which can hit targets beyond visual range.

    ...
    This approach would obviate the need to suppress Libyan air defenses before imposing a no-fly zone, since coalition aircraft would operate beyond their effective range. In addition, rather than employing aircraft from carriers, it would use a much smaller number of land-based combat aircraft that can be refueled in the air.

    article by james thomas & zachary cooper 3/9/11 fyi fwiw
    Thread Starter
  23. Unfortunately, I think we will find out who is right.
  24.  
    Originally Posted by ginwilly View Post

    well, we did drop a few bombs and some countries would put it in the same light. I wouldn't though ftr.

    You wouldn't call what we did to the Native Americans genocide?
  25. norcal every single time you post anything longer than 2 sentances I want to watch you and everybody that thinks like you die...

    it honestly makes me sad that people think the way you do
     
  26. What the fuck kind of thing is that to say?
  27.  
    Originally Posted by emcee21 View Post

    What the fuck kind of thing is that to say?

    Haha right? some ez fishing round these parts imo. Grab a pole. Theyre biting hard.
  28. Wtf? I disagree with ncj like 98.2% of the time but never would such a thought cross my mind.
    imo
    Edited By: LuckyWilbury Mar 11th, 2011 at 05:41 AM
  29. ok sorry... I dont want to watch him die... I cant even stand the sight of blood...

    would much rather that nobody on this earth thought the way he did tho
     
  30.  
    Originally Posted by ginwilly View Post

    well, we did drop a few bombs and some countries would put it in the same light. I wouldn't though ftr.

    Thats not what I was sarcastically hinting at. I was thinking more along the lines of the US funding Iraq and Israel. As well as all the other bullshit they get into like Nicaragua.
Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 41 2 3 4