Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. I was talking to my folks last night and they told me that Obama plans to implement a 55% inheritance tax?

    Is this possible, it sounds ridiculous. How the hell does the government feel it is owed money that has already been taxed? Ive always tried to be self made but my grand dad has like 10 mill in the bank, and my dads a doctor so this would be pretty annoying if it gets implemented.

    What can we realistically expect.
  2. Its bad to die with money and assessts, mkay.
  3. hookers and blow then the government gets nothing. easy answer.
  4. have him gift as much as he can to you/your siblings/children etc. now, if he is planning to give it to you anyway, he can give 12k tax free to each eligible person, this year anyway.
  5. No offense, but your parents sound like suckers who believe whatever they get sent in their email

    Estate Tax. The claim that Obama proposes to "restore the inheritance tax" is also false, as are the claims that McCain would impose zero tax and that Bush "repealed" it. McCain and Obama both would retain a reduced version of the estate tax, as it is correctly called, though McCain would reduce it by more.

    The tax now falls only on estates valued at more than $2 million (effectively $4 million for couples able to set up the required legal and financial arrangements). It reaches a maximum rate of 45 percent on amounts more than that. It was not repealed, but it is set to expire temporarily in 2010, then return in 2011, when it would apply to estates valued at more than $1 million ($2 million for couples), with the maximum rate rising to 55 percent.

    Obama has proposed to apply the tax only to estates valued at more than $3.5 million ($7 million for couples), holding the maximum rate at 45 percent. McCain would apply it to estates worth more than $5 million ($10 million for couples), with a maximum rate of 15 percent.

    http://www.factcheck.org/askfactchec...fits_if_i.html

    *** EDIT - and just to be clear, it is a law passed by Republican president/congress currently in place that has the estate tax moving to 55% in 2010, unless something is done. But both candidates were suggesting something will be done as soon as they take office.
  6. You say my parents sound like suckers but you lay it out there pretty plainly. The difference between 15% and 45% is huge. You lump the two plans together as if they are very similar. Again why does this money get taxed again at all?

    If this doesnt qualify as wealth redistribution im not sure what does.

    My grand dad has set up a trust for myself and all of my cousins but I cant access it til im 40 or something. I guess steps are being made to move as much as it as possible.
    Thread Starter
  7. I dont care who passed this tax, it is insane to me that after they have already been taxed on this money, probably more than once, that they would then tax you again after you die. Not only tax you again but at 45%. Thats really sticking it in your ass. Im no economics guy but is this right?

    Guy makes 5 million dollars, gets taxed at say 40% thats 2 mil in taxes paid.

    then lets say he has a heart attack and dies

    3 million taxed at 45%

    out of his 5 mil earned his family gets to keep 1.65 mil.
    Thats fucking bogus.
  8. If you:

    1. Live in or near Ohio.

    and

    2. You yourself, or have parents whom, wish to avoid the inheritance and estate taxes.

    Please pm me. For my work I specialize in helping people circumvent the government and ensure that the majority, if not all, of their money go to the people they want to leave it to rather than to the greedy government assholes. If you're interested, and live in other states, pm me as well and I could potentially tell you who to talk to.
  9. Jesus H. Christ. Obama can't even get into office before people start blaming him for shit that he had absolutely nothing to do with whatsoever.

    The money gets taxed because that's how our government works. It sucks, but that's the pain of living in the good old U.S. of A.

    The beauty of it is that we have the power to elect people who say they're going to change it (of course we learn that about 10% of the promises are actually kept once they get into office).

    If the inheritance tax starts at estates worth $2 million right now, and Obama wants to move it to $3.5 million, but keep the maximum tax rate at 45%, it's still an improvement and a hell of a lot more realistic than McCain's proposed changes.

    You said yourself that there is a big difference between 15% and 45%. Which one sounds like reality and which one sounds like a desperate move to get votes? That tax money has to be recouped somehow to help get us out of this enormous deficit. Too bad voters in 2004 thought it was a better idea to rebuild Iraq than improve things here.
  10.  
    Originally Posted by pocketmilkduds View Post

    You say my parents sound like suckers but you lay it out there pretty plainly. The difference between 15% and 45% is huge. You lump the two plans together as if they are very similar. Again why does this money get taxed again at all?

    If this doesnt qualify as wealth redistribution im not sure what does.

    Yes, I did lay it out plainly. The Republican president and congress has already passed a law that raises the estate tax to 55% in 2010 (yes this law was passed back in 2003 when dems were not in power yet). So who exactly is doing the redistribution of weath here?

    If your parents are blaming that on Obama, they are suckers who will believe anything someone sends them in an email without checking what the facts are first. Obama is not "implementing" anything. The tax law is already there and he is suggesting to reduce it. Granted not as much as McCain did, but your characterization in the OP is completley off base.
  11. Any tax on an estate of a person who has passed away is robbery.

    A person spends their whole life paying taxes on their earnings and when they pass away any amount that is taken by the government is just akin to robbery. The individual has already paid taxes on their money while they were living.

    Sometimes I get disgusted as to what the government; who cares who passed the law as it does not matter to me which party did it, believes they can steal from the "we the people."
  12. THe best part of this tax (which Democrats keep fighting FOR and Repub's comprimise with) is the fact that if mom and dad's estate has IRA or 401k money in it then the kids get about 20 cents of every dollar beyond the Death Tax threshold. they get double taxed from DOLLAR ONE. They don't just pay estate tax on everything that is left after they pay income tax on ira's they pay BOTH the death tax and income tax on dollar one after the limit.

    Say life insurance (outside of an irrevocable trust), home equity, savings, other real estate, personal property, maybe a business or even a FARM total over $2 million their tax deferred retirement savings gets hacked to hell.

    Say parents leave the 2 kids each $500k in 401k assets and parents have a business or other assets and life insurance totalling 2 million - the kids pay income tax at soon to be 39% and inheritance tax of 45% and hey, don't forget state income tax. The gov't gets about 83% and kids get 17% LOLOLOLOLOOOOL - Thanks DUMMYCRATS!!!
  13. Life insurance payouts are not taxable.
  14. ^^^wrong^^^ They are subject to ESTATE tax

    In fact sometimes they are even subject to income tax if the premiums are income tax deducted. This happens to the self employed ans small business owners.
  15. Bobcat is an estate tax planner, i think. but Niptuck is never wrong so I'm conflicted here.
  16.  
    Originally Posted by niptuck View Post

    THe best part of this tax (which Democrats keep fighting FOR and Repub's comprimise with) is the fact that if mom and dad's estate has IRA or 401k money in it then the kids get about 20 cents of every dollar beyond the Death Tax threshold. they get double taxed from DOLLAR ONE. They don't just pay estate tax on everything that is left after they pay income tax on ira's they pay BOTH the death tax and income tax on dollar one after the limit.

    Say life insurance (outside of an irrevocable trust), home equity, savings, other real estate, personal property, maybe a business or even a FARM total over $2 million their tax deferred retirement savings gets hacked to hell.

    Say parents leave the 2 kids each $500k in 401k assets and parents have a business or other assets and life insurance totalling 2 million - the kids pay income tax at soon to be 39% and inheritance tax of 45% and hey, don't forget state income tax. The gov't gets about 83% and kids get 17% LOLOLOLOLOOOOL - Thanks DUMMYCRATS!!!

    ^^^^ is this possible. Are there any solutions? This is socialsim right?
    Thread Starter
  17. I am sure bobcat is refeffing to income tax but this thread is about estate tax and I stated that. I am also saying the kids get 20 cents on the the dollar on the ira/401k money. The life insurance is only taxed at a 'measly' 45% above the $2mill. But again, they may even have to pay income tax on the life insurance if the premiums were originally deducted. People, especially Obama, like to have fun saying "tax" like there is only one. IE: I will lower the tax on 95% of Americans.

    He means he will lower the INCOME tax on 95% of people PAYING income tax which is about 70% of the population but he says nothing about Medicade tax, Estate tax, SS tax, gasoline tax, imputed income tax, other employment tax, etc etc.
  18. It's so much fun to watch wingnuts squirm over a tax.....OMG SOCIALISM!!!
  19. ^^^^ A very noble & moral cause ^^^^

    F Tax
  20.  
    Originally Posted by Tread View Post

    No offense, but your parents sound like suckers who believe whatever they get sent in their email

    Estate Tax. The claim that Obama proposes to "restore the inheritance tax" is also false, as are the claims that McCain would impose zero tax and that Bush "repealed" it. McCain and Obama both would retain a reduced version of the estate tax, as it is correctly called, though McCain would reduce it by more.

    The tax now falls only on estates valued at more than $2 million (effectively $4 million for couples able to set up the required legal and financial arrangements). It reaches a maximum rate of 45 percent on amounts more than that. It was not repealed, but it is set to expire temporarily in 2010, then return in 2011, when it would apply to estates valued at more than $1 million ($2 million for couples), with the maximum rate rising to 55 percent.

    Obama has proposed to apply the tax only to estates valued at more than $3.5 million ($7 million for couples), holding the maximum rate at 45 percent. McCain would apply it to estates worth more than $5 million ($10 million for couples), with a maximum rate of 15 percent.

    http://www.factcheck.org/askfactchec...fits_if_i.html

    *** EDIT - and just to be clear, it is a law passed by Republican president/congress currently in place that has the estate tax moving to 55% in 2010, unless something is done. But both candidates were suggesting something will be done as soon as they take office.

    loolz you imply his parents are wrong then prove their exact point. wp.
  21.  
    Originally Posted by rocksockyea View Post

    It's so much fun to watch wingnuts squirm over a tax.....OMG SOCIALISM!!!

    yeah, it's hilarious when ppl get upset about being robbed
  22. <TABLE class=wikitable align=right border=1><TBODY><TR><TH>Year</TH><TH>Exclusion
    Amount</TH><TH>Max/Top
    tax rate</TH></TR><TR><TD>2001</TD><TD>$675,000</TD><TD>55%</TD></TR><TR><TD>2002</TD><TD>$1 million</TD><TD>50%</TD></TR><TR><TD>2003</TD><TD>$1 million</TD><TD>49%</TD></TR><TR><TD>2004</TD><TD>$1.5 million</TD><TD>48%</TD></TR><TR><TD>2005</TD><TD>$1.5 million</TD><TD>47%</TD></TR><TR><TD>2006</TD><TD>$2 million</TD><TD>46%</TD></TR><TR><TD>2007</TD><TD>$2 million</TD><TD>45%</TD></TR><TR><TD>2008</TD><TD>$2 million</TD><TD>45%</TD></TR><TR><TD>2009</TD><TD>$3.5 million</TD><TD>45%</TD></TR><TR><TD>2010</TD><TD>repealed</TD><TD>0%</TD></TR><TR><TD>2011</TD><TD>$1 million</TD><TD>55%</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

    Rich people will be droppin like flies in 2010--->
     
  23.  
    Originally Posted by kowboy8686 View Post

    loolz you imply his parents are wrong then prove their exact point. wp.

    I didnt "imply" anything. I stated the facts that his parents are indeed COMPLETELY wrong.

    1) Obama is not "implementing" anything, the tax already exists

    2) Obama is not the one suggesting a 55% rate, that rate already exists for 2010 due to a Republican passed law.

    3) Obama has proposed to reduce the rate defined by existing law to 45%

    Their "exact" point is that the estate tax's implementation and 55% rate is something Obama is suggesting he is going to put in place. That "exact" point is 100% factually incorrect. Obama wants to reduce the current law. You guys can argue all you want about whether the tax should exist or not, but the sprit of the OP trying to tie its introduction or 55% rate to Obama is completely false.

    Perhaps you should read things a little more closely before posting.
  24. lol at republicans passing a 55% inheritance tax. you people believe anything
  25. I think my parents point was that 45%>15% so im not sure where they were completly wrong.
    Thread Starter
  26. IT'S CALLED A DEATH TAX!
  27.  
    Originally Posted by Tread View Post

     
    Originally Posted by kowboy8686 View Post

    loolz you imply his parents are wrong then prove their exact point. wp.

    I didnt "imply" anything. I stated the facts that his parents are indeed COMPLETELY wrong.

    1) Obama is not "implementing" anything, the tax already exists

    2) Obama is not the one suggesting a 55% rate, that rate already exists for 2010 due to a Republican passed law.

    3) Obama has proposed to reduce the rate defined by existing law to 45%

    Their "exact" point is that the estate tax's implementation and 55% rate is something Obama is suggesting he is going to put in place. That "exact" point is 100% factually incorrect. Obama wants to reduce the current law. You guys can argue all you want about whether the tax should exist or not, but the sprit of the OP trying to tie its introduction or 55% rate to Obama is completely false.

    Perhaps you should read things a little more closely before posting.

    "2) Obama is not the one suggesting a 55% rate, that rate already exists for 2010 due to a Republican passed law."

    Quite misleading tread, wp
     
  28.  
    Originally Posted by Tread View Post

     
    Originally Posted by kowboy8686 View Post

    loolz you imply his parents are wrong then prove their exact point. wp.

    I didnt "imply" anything. I stated the facts that his parents are indeed COMPLETELY wrong.

    1) Obama is not "implementing" anything, the tax already exists

    2) Obama is not the one suggesting a 55% rate, that rate already exists for 2010 due to a Republican passed law.

    3) Obama has proposed to reduce the rate defined by existing law to 45%

    Their "exact" point is that the estate tax's implementation and 55% rate is something Obama is suggesting he is going to put in place. That "exact" point is 100% factually incorrect. Obama wants to reduce the current law. You guys can argue all you want about whether the tax should exist or not, but the sprit of the OP trying to tie its introduction or 55% rate to Obama is completely false.

    Perhaps you should read things a little more closely before posting.

    your added thoughts are full of more shit than a chinese monster movie. if it were up to the repubs that tax wouldve been repealed long long ago.
  29. Clinton vetoed the GOP's attempt at repealing the death tax in 2000. Thanks Willy!

    http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLI...tax/index.html
     
  30. seriously people, if you don't like the death tax then just don't die. fucking morans

Similar Threads