Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. For the life of me I don't understand how you can be a replay official and still get shit wrong. It happens every effin week and they just blew a huge call in the Bama/LSUgame( for the record I don't care who wins so this has nothing to do with anything) ... Why is this so hard

    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
     
  2. the original ruling decided that call, not the replay.
  3.  
    Originally Posted by LDM View Post


    the original ruling decided that call, not the replay.

    Instant replay was put into use to GET THE CALL RIGHT

    They did not and it wasn't that hard a decision since he got 2 feet in and only needed one
    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
     
    Thread Starter
  4.  
    Originally Posted by LDM View Post

    the original ruling decided that call, not the replay.

    The worst part was that the first replay CBS showed, from behind the play (defense's perspective) CLEARLY showed BOTH feet come down in bounds. Instead they show the same two replays that give you no idea whether the right foot came down in bounds. Fact is he got BOTH feet down, and there was CLEAR evidence to overturn it. DVR the thing. Go back and look at the very first replay CBS showed. It's clear as day that he gets his right foot down in bounds, too.
     
  5.  
    Originally Posted by LDM View Post

    the sec cheating decided that call, not the replay.

    fyp
  6. you all do realize that you have to get a foot down AFTER possession right? and because he was in the act of tucking the ball possession didn't start until it was tucked.

    i still think it was a pick, but a hell of a lot closer than what you guys thought. and that's why replay didn't overturn. the call on the field decided the play.
  7. 6:10 P.M. CST marinersheep and orgnalsooners totally agree !!!!! hope u did well with all stud 8 chips I gave u the other day...

    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
     
    Thread Starter
  8.  
    Originally Posted by orgnalsooners View Post

    6:10 P.M. CST marinersheep and orgnalsooners totally agree !!!!! hope u did well with all stud 8 chips I gave u the other day...

    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">

    Nope, didn't even come close to doing well. It's Stud8. You know how it goes.
     
  9. when i read "instant replay is a joke" i couldn't help but be disappointed when i opened the thread and didn't see:

    instant replay walked into a bar, then it walked into a bar again, slower.
  10.  
    Originally Posted by LDM View Post

    you all do realize that you have to get a foot down AFTER possession right? and because he was in the act of tucking the ball possession didn't start until it was tucked.

    i still think it was a pick, but a hell of a lot closer than what you guys thought. and that's why replay didn't overturn. the call on the field decided the play.

    Are u just an idiot or are u Bama homer? The dude had CLEAR possession when it stuck to his damn hands... IT NEVER MOVED whatsoever... He had the ball AND 2 feet in and it's not even close... I am not going to reply to u again as I must be getting leveled here. I guess u think Oregon wasn't offsides a few years ago versus Oklahoma either b/c those replay officials didn't reverse the call on the field either. GTFO
    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
     
    Thread Starter
  11.  
    Originally Posted by orgnalsooners View Post

    Are u just an idiot or are u Bama homer? The dude had CLEAR possession when it stuck to his damn hands... IT NEVER MOVED whatsoever... He had the ball AND 2 feet in and it's not even close... I am not going to reply to u again as I must be getting leveled here. I guess u think Oregon wasn't offsides a few years ago versus Oklahoma either b/c those replay officials didn't reverse the call on the field either. GTFO
    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">

    I didn't write the rules. NCAA catch/possession rule about tucking a catch says it's possessed once tucked, not before.

    There was only one foot in question after the tuck, and it was close. I say it was in, Replay official said it wasn't enough to overturn.

    The call on the field still decided.
  12. I didnt think it was a pick....
  13. college football reviews are god awful theres been plenty of calls that should have been overturned. i never thought id say this but i can hardly stand watching football anymore bc of the refs having so much influence these days!. mostly the gay ass touching the qb with your pinky and its an auto 15 yds. or the ball carrier lowers his shoulder and helmets make contact and you get 15 yds. its fucking embarassing
  14.  
    Originally Posted by swizbeatz View Post

    I didnt think it was a pick....

    lol nice level
  15.  
    Originally Posted by orgnalsooners View Post

    Are u just an idiot or are u Bama homer? The dude had CLEAR possession when it stuck to his damn hands... IT NEVER MOVED whatsoever... He had the ball AND 2 feet in and it's not even close... I am not going to reply to u again as I must be getting leveled here. I guess u think Oregon wasn't offsides a few years ago versus Oklahoma either b/c those replay officials didn't reverse the call on the field either. GTFO
    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">

    being a douche bag doesn't make your argument better.

    Bama homer here.
  16. Not being a douche at all and in fact hope he is just a homer b/c it is OBVIOUS to anyone with a brain that he was in, that's it, no discussion, it's a factttttt. And u do not have to tuck the ball for it to be a catch whatsoever.... You have to have clear possession with 1 foot in.... Period

    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
     
    Thread Starter
  17. agree with op...sec blows imo, but the decision to not overturn the call was horrible
     
  18. Houston Tulsa Game, that ball did not fucking touch that guy and the call stands? seriously this is a fuckin joke
  19. Post it trent if u have vid, I'm watching Sooners (sfobv)

    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
     
    Thread Starter
  20.  
    Originally Posted by orgnalsooners View Post

    Not being a douche at all and in fact hope he is just a homer b/c it is OBVIOUS to anyone with a brain that he was in, that's it, no discussion, it's a factttttt. And u do not have to tuck the ball for it to be a catch whatsoever.... You have to have clear possession with 1 foot in.... Period

    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">

    well. Clearly, it's not a fact.

    If the ruling on the field was an interception, they would have not overturned it either.

    The ruling on the field in this case made all the difference.
  21.  
    Originally Posted by orgnalsooners View Post

    Not being a douche at all and in fact hope he is just a homer b/c it is OBVIOUS to anyone with a brain that he was in, that's it, no discussion, it's a factttttt. And u do not have to tuck the ball for it to be a catch whatsoever.... You have to have clear possession with 1 foot in.... Period

    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">

    it's got to take a lot of practice to be as ignorant as you.

    at no point did i say it wasn't an interception, IN MY OPINION. but since it was called incomplete, ref needed undisputed proof to overturn. OBV if they thought he had possession as soon as the ball hit his hands, then he got two feet in. Unfortunately, you're dumbass doesn't know NCAA rulings. You can here Verne commenting on the fact since the player was in the act of tucking it's not secured til it's tucked.

    Since the player OFFICIALLY had possession after it was tucked there was only one foot in question. and it was close to the sideline and not conclusive in any way, shape, or form.

    Officially the play couldn't be overturned.

    Officially you are a douche and a dumbass to boot.
  22.  
    Originally Posted by LDM View Post


    Officially the play couldn't be overturned.

    Officially you are a douche and a dumbass to boot.

    Agree

    OP is just a bitter Big 12 fan wishing he could root for a SEC team
  23. FTR my team got doubled up by UT to the tune of 56-28. I hate the SEC, but live in the middle of the conference.
  24.  
    Originally Posted by LDM View Post

    I didn't write the rules. NCAA catch/possession rule about tucking a catch says it's possessed once tucked, not before.

    There was only one foot in question after the tuck, and it was close. I say it was in, Replay official said it wasn't enough to overturn.

    The call on the field still decided.

    What if a DB/WR never tucks the ball?

    There are plenty of times when a WR will make a catch and never tuck it...they'll reach for the goalline instead. AFAIK, reaching for the goalline would constitute possession of the ball, right?

    I don't see why this would be any different.
  25. listen to verne and danielaksdnflks whatever the other guy's name is. if you listen to the commentators they allude to the Tuck Rule<sub>A</sub> (we all know Brady owns the true Tuck Rule). I can't remember what game i was watching, but the ruled a pass incomplete because dude was still in one motion.
  26.  
    Originally Posted by BadAllergies View Post

    well. Clearly, it's not a fact.

    If the ruling on the field was an interception, they would have not overturned it either.

    The ruling on the field in this case made all the difference.

    This is all i was trying to say. Guess i'm not as good a woodsmith as you. Hope these guys don't jump your shit too. LOL
  27.  
    Originally Posted by LDM View Post

    it's got to take a lot of practice to be as ignorant as you.

    at no point did i say it wasn't an interception, IN MY OPINION. but since it was called incomplete, ref needed undisputed proof to overturn. OBV if they thought he had possession as soon as the ball hit his hands, then he got two feet in. Unfortunately, you're dumbass doesn't know NCAA rulings. You can here Verne commenting on the fact since the player was in the act of tucking it's not secured til it's tucked.

    Since the player OFFICIALLY had possession after it was tucked there was only one foot in question. and it was close to the sideline and not conclusive in any way, shape, or form.

    Officially the play couldn't be overturned.

    Officially you are a douche and a dumbass to boot.

    Yeah, I am the dumbass here who can hear, lol. Well if Verne Lundquist says it, it must be true. I can't believe you are continuing with this tuck shit... How many times do players catch the ball and never tuck it? The NCAA rules website is down so I can't post it but if you watch any amount of football whatsoever you should know that you do not have to tuck the ball.

    U and another Bama homer are the only 2 disputing that it was not conclusive whereas everyone else is being objective... Like I said, I have nothing vested in either team whatsoever so I am completely unbiased but I can call it as I clearly see it, not as I want it to be. Kinda funny that you're trying to call me out on something that you are 100% wrong about... Watch the rest of football for the evening and see if every ball is tucked or called incomplete, seriously.
    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
     
    Thread Starter
  28. I dont understand why replay doesn't use the 360 cams like ESPN has at games. I mean in this day and age we cant tell exactly if a player has a foot in bounds or crosses the goal line?

    I get the feeling that the replay officials don't want to overturn many of the officials calls because of the impression it may give about officiating. I hate seeing the stats like only 6 of 39 reviewed plays in the Big 12 this year have been overturned, thats bullshit.
  29.  
    Originally Posted by orgnalsooners View Post

    Yeah, I am the dumbass here who can hear, lol. Well if Verne Lundquist says it, it must be true. I can't believe you are continuing with this tuck shit... How many times do players catch the ball and never tuck it? The NCAA rules website is down so I can't post it but if you watch any amount of football whatsoever you should know that you do not have to tuck the ball.

    U and another Bama homer are the only 2 disputing that it was not conclusive whereas everyone else is being objective... Like I said, I have nothing vested in either team whatsoever so I am completely unbiased but I can call it as I clearly see it, not as I want it to be. Kinda funny that you're trying to call me out on something that you are 100% wrong about... Watch the rest of football for the evening and see if every ball is tucked or called incomplete, seriously.
    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">

    you're missing the point.

    The ruling on the field is what is important here.

    Video wasn't clear enough for the replay ref to overturn(in his opinion), thus the ruling on the field stands.

    IMO if it had been called an interception on the field, it would have stood as an interception
  30.  
    Originally Posted by BlindBuddah View Post


    I dont understand why replay doesn't use the 360 cams like ESPN has at games. I mean in this day and age we cant tell exactly if a player has a foot in bounds or crosses the goal line?

    I get the feeling that the replay officials don't want to overturn many of the officials calls because of the impression it may give about officiating. I hate seeing the stats like only 6 of 39 reviewed plays in the Big 12 this year have been overturned, thats bullshit.

    marinersheep made a gr8 point in that the officials see the replays that we see and even though it was conclusive from the replay it was sooooooooooooo much more from the back angle that they first showed but never showed again.... Officials HATE
    being wrong and maybe they hate it more than getting it right but this thread has run it's course. It was a bad call and I wish I had video of that DB pullin a Deion Sanders running down the field with with the ball over his heads never tucked from earlier this year so I could make my point via video but w/e.
    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
     
    Thread Starter

Similar Threads