Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local

Instant Replay is a Joke

Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 21 2
  1. LDM LDM is offline

    Gallatin, TN
    United States

    Posts: 7,818
    Joined: Feb 06

    Nov 7th, 2009 (11/7/2009 9:54pm) in reply to orgnalsooners

     
    Originally Posted by [b

    orgnal[/b]sooners;4865411] Yeah, I am the dumbass here who can hear, lol. Well if Verne Lundquist says it, it must be true. I can't believe you are continuing with this tuck shit... How many times do players catch the ball and never tuck it? The NCAA rules website is down so I can't post it but if you watch any amount of football whatsoever you should know that you do not have to tuck the ball.

    U and another Bama homer are the only 2 disputing that it was not conclusive whereas everyone else is being objective... Like I said, I have nothing vested in either team whatsoever so I am completely unbiased but I can call it as I clearly see it, not as I want it to be. Kinda funny that you're trying to call me out on something that you are 100% wrong about... Watch the rest of football for the evening and see if every ball is tucked or called incomplete, seriously.
    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">

    Is this a spelling contest. Because if so we usually start by with our names. and you can't get that right.

    and i'm not disputing shit, unless someones trying to prove you have a modicum of intelligence. that i'd dispute. I think it was a pick.

    THE REFS WHO GET PAID TO MAKE THE CALLS AND ARE PROs said it wasn't though. yes they get calls wrong. yes replay gets calls wrong, but you're a dumbass if you think it's indisputable.

    You don't have to tuck the ball to have possession, BUT if you initiate the movement possession is after it's completed. i didn't make the shit up. it's just the second game this year i've seen it called. verne was prolly alluding to the same game earlier in the season. you can HERE him say "yeah but he's in the process of tucking it".

    be less of a douche.
  2. orgnalsooners orgnalsooners is offline

    Austin, TX
    United States

    Posts: 6,302
    Joined: Nov 07

    Nov 7th, 2009 (11/7/2009 9:56pm) in reply to BadAllergies

     
    Originally Posted by BadAllergies View Post

    you're missing the point.

    The ruling on the field is what is important here.

    Video wasn't clear enough for the replay ref to overturn(in his opinion), thus the ruling on the field stands.

    IMO if it had been called an interception on the field, it would have stood as an interception

    Dude, I get that but an INT is an INT, whether it is called on the field or not... It was conclusive... If I felt it was 90% or even 95% then play stands as called on the field but I have no doubt that it was an INT... I haven't watched scoreboard shows but I am looking fwd to see what herbstreit says b/c basically he is CFB GOD
    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
     
    Thread Starter
  3. BadAllergies BadAllergies is offline

    IL
    United States

    Posts: 2,313
    Joined: Aug 08

    Nov 7th, 2009 (11/7/2009 10:02pm) in reply to orgnalsooners

     
    Originally Posted by orgnalsooners View Post

    I have no doubt that it was an INT.
    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">

    exactly, you, not the replay ref
  4. heavyj80 heavyj80 is offline

    West Babylon, NY
    United States

    Posts: 17,435
    Joined: Aug 07

    Nov 7th, 2009 (11/7/2009 10:05pm) in reply to BadAllergies

     
    Originally Posted by BadAllergies View Post


    exactly, you, not the replay ref

    well ldo hes unbiased like the rest of us
    duno why bama fans are so upset over this. its not a dis to your team. it was a ridiculously fortunate call. no one is (or should be atleast) hating on the team itself.
  5. BadAllergies BadAllergies is offline

    IL
    United States

    Posts: 2,313
    Joined: Aug 08

    Nov 7th, 2009 (11/7/2009 10:12pm) in reply to heavyj80

     
    Originally Posted by heavyj80 View Post

    well ldo hes unbiased like the rest of us
    duno why bama fans are so upset over this. its not a dis to your team. it was a ridiculously fortunate call. no one is (or should be atleast) hating on the team itself.

    was OP this fired up about the 2 missed replays in the Iowa game last week?

    I don't know, but I hope so.

    I think there is a lot of Bama hate going around
  6. orgnalsooners orgnalsooners is offline

    Austin, TX
    United States

    Posts: 6,302
    Joined: Nov 07

    Nov 7th, 2009 (11/7/2009 10:42pm) in reply to BadAllergies

    Funny thing is I like Bama... I hate Fla and LSU though that has more to do with whooping my team but I have always liked the tide...

    I did not see the Iowa game last week but I am fired up about any call that I think is unjust when there is replay in hand... I mean that play in the playoffs with the Yankees down the left field line really pissed me off but w/o replay it's wasted energy... GL

    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
     
    Thread Starter
  7. marinersheep marinersheep is offline This is stupid.

    Seattle, WA
    United States

    Posts: 15,092
    Joined: Feb 06

    Nov 7th, 2009 (11/7/2009 10:44pm) in reply to BadAllergies

     
    Originally Posted by BadAllergies View Post

    was OP this fired up about the 2 missed replays in the Iowa game last week?

    I don't know, but I hope so.

    I think there is a lot of Bama hate going around

    Wut?

    It's not Bama hate. Bama probably wins that game whether or not they give LSU the interception.

    Fact of the matter is that it was a clear interception, and Lundquist and Danielson are wrong on the rule. You don't need to have the ball tucked to have possession. As long as you have clear control of the ball and it's not being bobbled or moving, it's a catch. He got both feet down in bounds (despite only needing one) with possession of the ball.

    I'm not hating on Bama at all. It just annoys me, as an unbiased observer, when idiots blow obvious calls. Like I said, I think Alabama almost surely holds on to the win with or without that play being ruled incomplete. He did get both feet down with possession, though. Seems pretty obvious to me.
     
  8. Randers Randers is offline

    Posts: 12,888
    Joined: Nov 05

    Nov 7th, 2009 (11/7/2009 10:46pm) in reply to marinersheep

    The review system gives the refs a bailout on some totally botched calls.

    I think it fixes more wrong than it misses rights.
     
  9. BadAllergies BadAllergies is offline

    IL
    United States

    Posts: 2,313
    Joined: Aug 08

    Nov 7th, 2009 (11/7/2009 10:55pm) in reply to marinersheep

     
    Originally Posted by marinersheep View Post

    Fact of the matter is that it was a clear interception

    the problem is, the Replay ref makes that decision, not you

    The ruling on the field is what comes into play here, not the rules of tucking or whatever.

    This play was less influential on the outcome on the game than the running into the kicker on a 4 and 6 which led to this drive.
  10. hldngaflush hldngaflush is offline UT Homer

    Nashville, TN
    United States

    Posts: 4,805
    Joined: Mar 07

    Nov 8th, 2009 (11/8/2009 12:09am) in reply to orgnalsooners

    i liked the call because it helped bama -7.5, LOL @ ud and his -7, but he was clearly in bounds with 2 feet. Thanks refs
  11. hldngaflush hldngaflush is offline UT Homer

    Nashville, TN
    United States

    Posts: 4,805
    Joined: Mar 07

    Nov 10th, 2009 (11/10/2009 9:46am) in reply to orgnalsooners

    Turns out they (edit: might have) made the right call. Did Julio touched the ball first while his left foot was out of bounds? Ball is considered out of play once he touches it.

    What do ya'll think?

    <object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/abuCLF7hJ6s&hl=en&fs=1&"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/abuCLF7hJ6s&hl=en&fs=1&" mce_src="http://www.youtube.com/v/abuCLF7hJ6s&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></object>
  12. Rocket Surgeon Rocket Surgeon is offline & brain scientist

    United States

    Posts: 12,012
    Joined: Apr 05

    Nov 10th, 2009 (11/10/2009 10:07am) in reply to hldngaflush

    lol @ that not being an interception

    wow
  13. louiemdj louiemdj is offline

    Monett, MO
    United States

    Posts: 5,915
    Joined: Jul 07

    Nov 10th, 2009 (11/10/2009 10:19am) in reply to orgnalsooners

    SEC is the new NBA obv.
  14. Randers Randers is offline

    Posts: 12,888
    Joined: Nov 05

    Nov 10th, 2009 (11/10/2009 12:17pm) in reply to louiemdj

    That ref has the worst dumbface.

    He's in the middle of 88% of all SEC shitstorms too.

    wp'd Sir Dumbface
     
  15. Smokin Zags Smokin Zags is offline 2010 CA Amateur Golf Champion

    Lake Forest, CA
    United States

    Posts: 1,941
    Joined: Oct 07

    Nov 10th, 2009 (11/10/2009 12:36pm) in reply to Rocket Surgeon

     
    Originally Posted by brianyut View Post

    lol @ that not being an interception

    wow

     
  16. Artiecat Artiecat is offline

    Togo

    Posts: 5,639
    Joined: Jan 05

    Nov 10th, 2009 (11/10/2009 12:39pm) in reply to hldngaflush

     
    Originally Posted by hldngaflush View Post

    Turns out they (edit: might have) made the right call. Did Julio touched the ball first while his left foot was out of bounds? Ball is considered out of play once he touches it.

    What do ya'll think?

    <OBJECT height=340 width=560><PARAM NAME="movie" VALUE="http://www.youtube.com/v/abuCLF7hJ6s&hl=en&fs=1&"><PARAM NAME="allowFullScreen" VALUE="true"><PARAM NAME="allowscriptaccess" VALUE="always"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/abuCLF7hJ6s&hl=en&fs=1&" mce_src="http://www.youtube.com/v/abuCLF7hJ6s&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></OBJECT>

    "I saw it differently too Bob Griese." LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!!!!!!!!!!!1
     
Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 21 2

Similar Threads