Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. lol never thought I'd see the day Darkpoker would be excited that Kobe is almost as good as MJ, haha but good article agree 100%, while clearly not MJ he is the only person who even deserves the comparison
     
  2. If it doesn't involve the words Lebron, of course I am happy. Kobe is better though
    Thread Starter
  3. Yahoo Sports, folks.
     
  4.  
    Originally Posted by Randers View Post

    Yahoo Sports, folks.

    guess you didn't like the article huh, Kobe def no MJ, IMO doesn't have the ability MJ had to be uber clutch as well as make all the players around him play to capabilities even thought thought impossible, but I think he is the only one since MJ that can even be compared which is what the article seemed to insinuate....
     
  5. Hate him or love him, It's true. This would be more of an arguement if Shaq/Malone didn't lose to the Pistons when Larry Brown outcoached them and when Kobe put a great run to eventually lose to the Celtics. He obviously learned from that season to win alone later.

    Good article, nice comparison, just 6/6 in Finals with 6 MVP's is something that puts Jordan over the top
     
  6. I laughed at this comment...

    "Remember that time in this article when the writer said, "Harold Miner?" That was funny."
  7.  
    Originally Posted by FadeToMac View Post

    I laughed at this comment...

    "Remember that time in this article when the writer said, "Harold Miner?" That was funny."

    loooool second I read Harold Miner I immed thought wtf is he doing in there, just because he got the nickname baby jordan from his dunk contest performance in no way meant ppl thought he was the next mj loool
     
  8. god those are sick stats, I took from the article that he was saying out of players since MJ finished Kobe was the only one that could even be talked about......not that he was MJ or anything but basically that he was #2 behind MJ since he retired, if that isn't what the article was saying, and it was comparing Kobe as the only person that could be compared to MJ in the history of the NBA than the article is a mf joke

    and yes /thread after those tmac stats, altho i don't believe that is the point the author was getting at....doesn't matter Kobe isn't close to MJ which was always obvious
    Edited By: mordan Jan 18th, 2012 at 05:20 AM
     
  9. /thread
    Edited By: Purple Jesus Jan 18th, 2012 at 05:07 AM
    Reason: @tmac
  10. Those number speak for themselfs... No one will ever be the player MJ was Kobe is as close as anyone has came but not even really that close.
  11. I posted this on my Twitter and in the NBA Betting Thread, but for those that didn't see it, this is a really cool link:

    http://www.nba.com/news/features/201...vey/index.html
     
  12. ive hated bball for quite some time but have always loved wat kobe does, i joined my 1st fantasy bball league this year and i fucking love it!
    winning probably helps as im in 1st but with the 2nd pick in the draft i picked cp3 and guess who was there for my 2nd pick mr black mamba aka i paid 4millie to your hand ill fuck wat i want
    not sure where i was headed with this piost but ill ill leave you with this

    im drunk
     
  13. ive hated bball for quite some time but have always loved wat kobe does, i joined my 1st fantasy bball league this year and i fucking love it!
    winning probably helps as im in 1st but with the 2nd pick in the draft i picked cp3 and guess who was there for my 2nd pick mr black mamba aka i paid 4millie to your hand ill fuck wat i want
    not sure where i was headed with this piost but ill ill leave you with this

    im drunk
     
  14.  
    Originally Posted by marinersheep View Post

    I posted this on my Twitter and in the NBA Betting Thread, but for those that didn't see it, this is a really cool link:

    http://www.nba.com/news/features/201...vey/index.html

    real cool link....most surprising for me was that CP3 was named as best leader in NBA, would've never thought that
     
  15. Obvious jordan is obvious

    Ps unless he means he got away with rape? Hey-ohhhh!
  16. kobe doesnt deserve to be compared to MJ in anyway....absolutely dumb there is only one michael jordan and there will NEVER be anything like him again - he truly is the best of all time in ANY sport. Kobe needed shaq who was the most dominant player in the nba by far the stats above show it
  17.  
    Originally Posted by Cortz View Post

    kobe doesnt deserve to be compared to MJ in anyway....absolutely dumb there is only one michael jordan and there will NEVER be anything like him again - he truly is the best of all time in ANY sport. Kobe needed shaq who was the most dominant player in the nba by far the stats above show it

  18.  
    Originally Posted by mordan View Post

    and yes /thread after those tmac stats, altho i don't believe that is the point the author was getting at....doesn't matter Kobe isn't close to MJ which was always obvious


     
    Originally Posted by Purple Jesus View Post

    /thread


     
    Originally Posted by perma_tilt View Post

    Those number speak for themselfs... No one will ever be the player MJ was Kobe is as close as anyone has came but not even really that close.

    I'm not sure if you guys realized this or not, but the name that appeared on most of those lists with MJ's name was that one guy that plays for the Heat...LeBron?

    Obv MJ is the best there is...the best there was...the best there ever will be. But let's not ignore that Kobe is absent from most of those lists with LeBron present on all but 1.
  19. Lebron is the Ron Paul of these discussions. People don't want to admit that he exists.

    KOBE THO WITH SHAQ AND GASOL/BYNUM!!!
  20. Obviously Jordan is the greatest ever but doesnt age need to be taken into account here. Kobe has 6 years on lebron and jordan didnt win a title until he was 28.

    Just saying its hard to compare career stats and totals when Jordan is retired, kobe is in the later stages of his career and lebrons is only around half way
  21.  
    Originally Posted by Niceguy View Post

    Lebron is the Ron Paul of these discussions. People don't want to admit that he exists.

    KOBE THO WITH SHAQ AND GASOL/BYNUM!!!

    Yea, because Lebron can't win an election (ring) either.
    Edited By: jesterwords Jan 18th, 2012 at 11:41 AM
  22.  
    Originally Posted by Cortz View Post

    kobe doesnt deserve to be compared to MJ in anyway....absolutely dumb there is only one michael jordan and there will NEVER be anything like him again - he truly is the best of all time in ANY sport. Kobe needed shaq who was the most dominant player in the nba by far the stats above show it

    Jordan needed Pippen...

    And if number of championships determine the "best" player, why isn't it Bill Russell?
    Edited By: Dyzalot Jan 18th, 2012 at 12:04 PM
     3
  23. Lol I notice a trend for the first 6 guys listed

    Which player does the most with the least?
    1. Kevin Love, Minnesota -- 26.9%
    2. Luis Scola, Houston -- 15.4%
    3. Steve Nash, Phoenix -- 7.7%
    Also receiving votes: J.J. Barea, Minnesota; Andrea Bargnani, Toronto; Brian Cardinal, Dallas; Mike Conley, Memphis; Glen Davis, Orlando; Jared Dudley, Phoenix; Raymond Felton, Portland; Landry Fields, New York; Dwight Howard, Orlando; Paul Millsap, Utah; Joakim Noah, Chicago; Dirk Nowitzki, Dallas; Zach Randolph, Memphis
  24.  
    Originally Posted by Dyzalot View Post

    Jordan needed Pippen...

    And if number of championships determine the "best" player, why isn't it Bill Russell?

    This is what bothers me more than anything. Jordan needed Pippen, Kobe needed Shaq and Gasol/Bynum, yet people act like every ring LeBron ever wins will have an asterisk next to it because he had DWade.

    Makes 0 sense.
  25. let them win one first
  26. kobe and jordan are very similar. they are both top notch assholes and horrible human beings. great bballers tho.
    Edited By: Bigblind Popper Jan 18th, 2012 at 02:09 PM
    Reason: ok thats a bit harsh. they are phenomenal bballers
  27. When Lebron gets his rings the Kobe/LeBron debate will be laughable. Just as the Kobe/Jordan debate is now
  28.  
    Originally Posted by zeppelinzoso16 View Post

    When Lebron gets his rings the Kobe/LeBron debate will be laughable. Just as the Kobe/Jordan debate is now

    Just like anyone/Russell debate is "laughable"? Why do rings matter except when they don't?
     3
  29. I do believe rings are overrated. Rings require the best team, not the best player.

Similar Threads