Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
http://detnews.com/article/20111127/NATION/111270335
A spokeswoman says the county removed the child because caseworkers saw his mother's inability to reduce his weight as medical neglect.
so I guess this is where we are now. A 200lb 8 year old is sad but...
-
I mean... i kinda understand your point.
But if you have an 8 year old, that weighs 200 fucking pounds... youre clearly doing something wrong. -
lol... oh America...
-
Idk, 200 lbs 8 year old sounds mighty delicious.
Another year of high sodium fast food and you could charge 40 a lb. -
I think at his age he might still qualify for veal status too.
-
guess he wont be joining me for meatless mondays
-
let's get a poll, best value for $40 a lb
Originally Posted by Niceguy
Idk, 200 lbs 8 year old sounds mighty delicious.
Another year of high sodium fast food and you could charge 40 a lb.
http://www.costco.com/Browse/Product...=1&topnav=&s=1 -
this country is barely recognizable anymore. this is pure bullshit.
-
There is next to NO information in that article. I'd like to know more.
On another note, what are the odds this kid gets to play peewee football? Best 8 year old lineman ever (assuming he can actually move, as opposed to floundering around on the ground the whole game...which would probably still block half the defense for the opposing team in his age group)? -
Saw a case like this a year ago where a state took a kid away from his parents for being grossly overweight. After a year in foster care nothing had changed and they then agreed with doctors that it was probably a medical issue, returned the kid to his family and apologized. LOL @ people who think they know best for others.
Originally Posted by ginwilly
http://detnews.com/article/20111127/NATION/111270335
A spokeswoman says the county removed the child because caseworkers saw his mother's inability to reduce his weight as medical neglect.
so I guess this is where we are now. A 200lb 8 year old is sad but...
-
The kid would run you around $8k, not counting the feed bill or the butchering costs depending on which way you decided to go.
Originally Posted by resilient
let's get a poll, best value for $40 a lb
http://www.costco.com/Browse/Product...=1&topnav=&s=1
I would go for the Kobe unless maybe they sold the kid off in individual cuts. -
figured Dyzalot would be all over this thread like a fat kid on a blue smartie
-
Edited By: killingbird Nov 29th, 2011 at 12:19 AMyeah, this is the problem. Need way more info to know how I feel about this case.Originally Posted by Dyzalot
Saw a case like this a year ago where a state took a kid away from his parents for being grossly overweight. After a year in foster care nothing had changed and they then agreed with doctors that it was probably a medical issue, returned the kid to his family and apologized. LOL @ people who think they know best for others.
I know I have seen parents on Toddlers and Tieras (or wtf that show is called) and 20 Kids and Counting that I thought should have their kids taken away...so I'm probably a bad person to pass judgement on this situation. -
fat kids usually grow up to be fucked in the head anyway. fat/lazy parents never think about that part of it.
-
Lol, that is one fuckin fat ass kid
-
on a side note, i was watching some mini documentary on that show where the moms spend thousands of dollars to make their little 5 and 6yr old girls look like beauty queens and enter them into contests. The moms all had one thing in common. They were all fat.
-
Yeah I mean look what happened to private pile.
-
ya, cause taking the kid from his parents is soooo much more effective than putting in the time/effort/resources to work with the family to fix the fucking conditions that are making him fat. I'm pretty sure whoever thought this was a good idea is too stupid to be fit for parenting, and should have their kids taken away as well.
-
Well, several things come to mind when reading this. Like OneM said, there is very little information to go on. Frankly, I'm surprised that a county spokesperson was even able to comment on the situation due to confidentiality issues. When I worked in Child Welfare, we had numerous cases that garnered media attention, but under no circumstances were we allowed to comment. We really couldn't even acknowledge that we were involved.
Kids are not typically just removed from their parents on short notice except in cases of extreme abuse where it is unsafe for them to remain in their home for any amount of time. DSS is required by law to do everything possible to keep kids with their families. Removing a child from their home is always the last resort. Not knowing a lot of details about the case, I would venture to guess that the parents were given ample opportunity to remedy the situation. Likely, they entered into a case plan with DSS to do certain things to get their child's weight under control and did not follow through within a reasonable time period.
Keep in mind that someone has to report these things to the authorities, so I would bet that there was a professional out there (the child's pediatrician, the school maybe?) that was concerned enough that they reported this. DSS would have to have evidence to present to the judge that the child's weight is unsafe and that it is neglect on the part of the parents. My guess is that it was probably the child's pediatrician who had probably tried to work with the parents to get their child's weight under control, but did not get cooperation.
I'm not saying that DSS never makes a mistake, but most of the time, what gets reported to the public is only a very small picture of what is truly going on. It happens all the time. -
-
heather, you have to be joking. remedy what situation? remedy how?
Originally Posted by ECUgirl
Well, several things come to mind when reading this. Like OneM said, there is very little information to go on. Frankly, I'm surprised that a county spokesperson was even able to comment on the situation due to confidentiality issues. When I worked in Child Welfare, we had numerous cases that garnered media attention, but under no circumstances were we allowed to comment. We really couldn't even acknowledge that we were involved.
Kids are not typically just removed from their parents on short notice except in cases of extreme abuse where it is unsafe for them to remain in their home for any amount of time. DSS is required by law to do everything possible to keep kids with their families. Removing a child from their home is always the last resort. Not knowing a lot of details about the case, I would venture to guess that the parents were given ample opportunity to remedy the situation. Likely, they entered into a case plan with DSS to do certain things to get their child's weight under control and did not follow through within a reasonable time period.
Keep in mind that someone has to report these things to the authorities, so I would bet that there was a professional out there (the child's pediatrician, the school maybe?) that was concerned enough that they reported this. DSS would have to have evidence to present to the judge that the child's weight is unsafe and that it is neglect on the part of the parents. My guess is that it was probably the child's pediatrician who had probably tried to work with the parents to get their child's weight under control, but did not get cooperation.
I'm not saying that DSS never makes a mistake, but most of the time, what gets reported to the public is only a very small picture of what is truly going on. It happens all the time.
lol @ the childs parents didnt obey the kids pediatrician. Good God, are you serious? -
Yes, I'm dead serious. How does an eight-year-old kid end up weighing 200 lbs. unless the parents are feeding him inappropriately? They remedy it by putting him on a diet and ensuring that he eats a balanced diet. Instead of giving him a cheeseburger and fries from McDonald's, they give him some fruits and vegetables. Instead of allowing him to sit in front of the TV and play video games all day, they take him for a walk or have him go outside and run around. You know, be a kid. Is it really that hard to teach a child to eat healthy? Last I checked, eight-year-olds don't go out and buy their own food, the parents provide it for them. If your kid is grossly obese, whose fault is it but your own (unless the child has some kind of medical condition, which I'm sure DSS would've investigated before removing him)?
Edited By: ECUgirl Nov 29th, 2011 at 01:28 AM
**I'm not talking about a few pounds overweight, but this kid is dangerously obese at 200 lbs/eight years old. You don't think that's a situation? -
yeah, its a situation alright. its a situation where the judge needs to give me 20 laps and 100 push-ups until he is recovered from being a douchbag.
Originally Posted by ECUgirl
Yes, I'm dead serious. How does an eight-year-old kid end up weighing 200 lbs. unless the parents are feeding him inappropriately? They remedy it by putting him on a diet and ensuring that he eats a balanced diet. Instead of giving him a cheeseburger and fries from McDonald's, they give him some fruits and vegetables. Instead of allowing him to sit in front of the TV and play video games all day, they take him for a walk or have him go outside and run around. You know, be a kid. Is it really that hard to teach a child to eat healthy? Last I checked, eight-year-olds don't go out and buy their own food, the parents provide it for them. If your kid is grossly obese, whose fault is it but your own (unless the child has some kind of medical condition, which I'm sure DSS would've investigated before removing him)?
**I'm not talking about a few pounds overweight, but this kid is dangerously obese at 200 lbs/eight years old. You don't think that's a situation? -
I'm not saying I agree or disagree with the decision to put the kid in foster care, I honestly don't know enough about the situation to make that call. I am typically on the side of don't put kids in foster care, but I realize after having worked in the field that sometimes there are situations where you have no other option. I was just trying to give people an idea of what happens when kids are placed in foster care and it's not a decision that's made lightly.
Obviously the feeling in this case was that the child was in some type of physical danger from being so overweight. Just because the parents and their attorneys say he wasn't, doesn't make it so. The judge looked at all the evidence and made the decision to place the child in foster care. He is privy to all the information, whereas we are not. -
Originally Posted by ECUgirl
Yes, I'm dead serious. How does an eight-year-old kid end up weighing 200 lbs. unless the parents are feeding him inappropriately? They remedy it by putting him on a diet and ensuring that he eats a balanced diet. Instead of giving him a cheeseburger and fries from McDonald's, they give him some fruits and vegetables. Instead of allowing him to sit in front of the TV and play video games all day, they take him for a walk or have him go outside and run around. You know, be a kid. Is it really that hard to teach a child to eat healthy? Last I checked, eight-year-olds don't go out and buy their own food, the parents provide it for them. If your kid is grossly obese, whose fault is it but your own (unless the child has some kind of medical condition, which I'm sure DSS would've investigated before removing him)?
**I'm not talking about a few pounds overweight, but this kid is dangerously obese at 200 lbs/eight years old. You don't think that's a situation?
i think Tony Perkis said that last sentence word for word at some point -
I wonder if the parents were glad to see him go. Probably saving a bundle on the grocery bill.










