[x]
  1.  
    Originally Posted by FenwayKing View Post

    Rivera is amazing, greatest reliever of all-time but if you think he's the greatest pitcher of all-time, you're pretty fucking dumb

    Buster Olney said earlier he rated Rivera as the 4th best pitcher in baseball history.

    He said it's because he basically pitched the equivalent of 2 full seasons in the postseason against the best teams in the league and still put up such ridiculous numbers.

    I was surprised that he ranked him quite that high. He named two old schools guys as 1 and 2 and then Clemons at 3. Not sure where he ranks Pedro.
  2. Is Rivera in the discussion of the greatest pitchers of all time?

    Yes. A discussion that goes like this.

    Guy 1: Do you think Mariano Rivera is one of the greatest pitchers of all time?
    Guy 2: Hell no.
     
  3. buster onley is a fuckin retard tho

     
    Originally Posted by SpankyHamm View Post

    Is Rivera in the discussion of the greatest pitchers of all time?

    Yes. A discussion that goes like this.

    Guy 1: Do you think Mariano Rivera is one of the greatest pitchers of all time?
    Guy 2: Hell no.

    uhhh no, not even close to accurate, horrible post
  4. Pedro > Everybody else in recent memory

    People are always rated higher when they are the story. How often do you hear player X is the best in the league during a broadcast whether it is overall player, QB, pitcher, PG, bla bla
  5. Sweet!! Rivera says he's coming back next season!! I hope he returns to his old form.
  6. pedro clemens and rivera seem like a solid top 3 from the past 20 years to me... if anyone wants to argue for someone else im listening.
  7. I just had ESPN on in the background. Not sure who said it, but he brought up innings pitch.

    Said Rivera was around 1,200 innings, and Maddux was over 5,000. Just hearing how far those numbers are apart (and I assume they will be like that for other long time starters), theres no way you can put him in the category of greatest pitcher.

    Keep him in the greatest reliever talk, and thats it.
    Edited By: Jaybone2315 May 4th, 2012 at 11:25 PM
  8. greg maddux, randy johnson get added to best of past 20 years, but maybe 4-5.
     
  9. yeah, good call

    I Would rank them both ahead of rivera
  10.  
    Originally Posted by SpankyHamm View Post

    Is Rivera in the discussion of the greatest pitchers of all time?

    Yes. A discussion that goes like this.

    Guy 1: Do you think Mariano Rivera is one of the greatest pitchers of all time?
    Guy 2: Hell no.

    haha this
  11.  
    Originally Posted by AMARTIN1181 View Post

    pedro clemens and rivera seem like a solid top 3 from the past 20 years to me... if anyone wants to argue for someone else im listening.

    Maddux and Big Unit are 2nd and 3rd all time in WAR. def better than Rivera. Halladay belongs in the argument as well.

    EDIT: too slow, you already posted you agree
    Edited By: TheWacoKidd May 4th, 2012 at 11:29 PM
     1
  12.  
    Originally Posted by AMARTIN1181 View Post

    yeah, good call

    I Would rank them both ahead of rivera

    Way to go out on a limb.
  13. Tom Glavine was pretty fucking good. Over 300 wins, probably the last pitcher that will do so.

    Other close calls over the past 20 years...

    John Smoltz, Mike Mussina, Roy Halladay, Curt Schilling

    Pedro, Clemens, Randy Johnson, and Greg Maddux are no brainers

    I'd personally take any of the above over Rivera. He's a HoF reliever, but the Closer position in general is one of the most over-payed, overrated positions in all of sports.
    Edited By: Chrono May 4th, 2012 at 11:41 PM
     
  14. I think this thread is going to turn into this.

    Q; How about (insert long time starter that will be in the HOF) being better then Rivera?
    A: Oh yea, I forgot about him. Yea, hes ahead of Rivera too.
  15.  
    Originally Posted by Jaybone2315 View Post

    I think this thread is going to turn into this.

    Q; How about (insert long time starter that will be in the HOF) being better then Rivera?
    A: Oh yea, I forgot about him. Yea, hes ahead of Rivera too.

    pretty much
     
  16.  
    Originally Posted by AMARTIN1181 View Post

    uhhh no, not even close to accurate, horrible post

    what don't you like about spanky's post
     2
  17. well, the implication that rivera isn't an all-time great. One of the greatest pitchers can encompass, say the top 100 pitchers of all time, of which rivera certainly is. IMO.
  18.  
    Originally Posted by slizza420 View Post

    Buster Olney said earlier he rated Rivera as the 4th best pitcher in baseball history.

    He said it's because he basically pitched the equivalent of 2 full seasons in the postseason against the best teams in the league and still put up such ridiculous numbers.

    I was surprised that he ranked him quite that high. He named two old schools guys as 1 and 2 and then Clemons at 3. Not sure where he ranks Pedro.


    Buster Olney is a fantasy analyst for ESPN... i hardly care who his top 5 pitchers are of all time... with that said i think to be considered a top 5 pitcher u would need to be a starter... mariano wasnt a starter cuz he lacked the standard mulitple pitch repertoire most starters need to have to go thru lineups 3 or 4 times... he made his career and built an empire off his one signature pitch... a cut fastball... imo hes definitely a top 20 pitcher of all time maybe top 15 but to throw him in top 5 just goes to show a Fantasy mindset... relievers are usually always going to have lower ERAs then starters for the exact reason i mentioned before.. u dont have to go thru the lineup multiple times in one outing...the more pitches a hitter sees off a given pitcher the better the hitter can adapt and adjust to that pitcher... its just how baseball works...
     
  19.  
    Originally Posted by cocoa_butter111 View Post

    Buster Olney is a fantasy analyst for ESPN

    no, he isn't.

    like i'm not saying you have to respect buster olney's opinion, but he isn't a fantasy analyst. so your entire analysis of him looking at it from a fantasy perspective is based on something that isn't true.
     2
  20.  
    Originally Posted by warden View Post

    no, he isn't.

    like i'm not saying you have to respect buster olney's opinion, but he isn't a fantasy analyst. so your entire analysis of him looking at it from a fantasy perspective is based on something that isn't true.


    I know man I was being overthetop cynical and sarcastic about his background when arguing for rivera being a top 5 pitcher.... i mean I dont know if you know this about him but for most of Buster's early career he covered the Yankees organization from minors to the majors and has a huge bias for rivera becuz he blossomed under his eyes as a journalist covering the team... i call him a fantasy analyst cuz thats the easiest way for me to trivialize his opinion (cuz he does in fact do fantasy work for espn) next time ill just say homer so you don't get so critical although im sure it would evoke the same response from ne1 tyring to argue something other then what the actual argument was...which is hes not a top 5 pitcher cuz he cudnt have been a starter and had the same incredible post season ERA that buster gets a hard on for in his lil soliloquies on espn,,,haha
     
  21. I cant put Mo in the Top 10 of his generation.

    Top 20 maybe/probably. Dont feel like going thru a list right now.
  22.  
    Originally Posted by Magnet Steve View Post

    Guess I missed the part where "Top 3" = "No. 3", but awesome contribution.

    Doesnt make any sense to say a guy is top 3 when hes clearly number 1. Factually correct I suppose but sounds pretty dumb.

    Michael Jordan is a top 50 basketball player of all time.
     
  23.  
    Originally Posted by dominant00 View Post

    Doesnt make any sense to say a guy is top 3 when hes clearly number 1. Factually correct I suppose but sounds pretty dumb.

    Michael Jordan is a top 50 basketball player of all time.


    are you sayin Mo Rivera is the best pitcher of all time?
     
  24.  
    Originally Posted by cocoa_butter111 View Post

    are you sayin Mo Rivera is the best pitcher of all time?

    Na we were talking about relievers.

    But as far as all pitchers go im not sure where i'd rank Mo. In the postseason I think a stud closer is just as valuable as a #1. And Mo doesnt just go one in the playoffs. He was ready for 2 anytime the Yankees needed it.
     
  25.  
    Originally Posted by dominant00 View Post

    . In the postseason I think a stud closer is just as valuable as a #1.

    No.
  26.  
    Originally Posted by Pker4Dummies View Post

    No.

    Why? You might only see a sp 1 time in a series.

    Reliever can shorten every single game.
     
  27.  
    Originally Posted by dominant00 View Post

    Why? You might only see a sp 1 time in a series.

    Reliever can shorten every single game.

    Most #1s will throw AT LEAST twice in a 7 game series...
  28.  
    Originally Posted by JRoth15 View Post

    Most #1s will throw AT LEAST twice in a 7 game series...

    Thats why I said might. Rotation might not be aligned perfectly the deeper you get in the playoffs and it might not go full 7.

    I guess my point is if you were to ask me who was the most valuable yankee during their 5 world series runs it would probably be Rivera and not a sp.

    Also not sure why you said and even capitalized "at least" twice. How many starting pitchers start 3 games in a series? I know CC was prepared to during 09 run when Yanks where only goin with three starters in the rotation but I cant really think of any other time that was the case.
     
  29. Pitcher who can potentially pitch 18 (really 27 ) innings vs a pitcher who could realistically potentially pitch what 10 innings max in a series
    Edited By: Pker4Dummies May 5th, 2012 at 01:47 AM
  30. Rivera never threw more than 8 innings in a series, did it once. Threw 7 innings twice. 6.1 and 6.0. So he has thrown 6-8 innings in a series 5/33 times.
Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 62 3 4 5 6