[x]
  1.  
    Originally Posted by sean614 View Post

    lack of respect for the sixers is amusing. Sixers > C's >>>>>> Knicks/Nets

    Your homerism has reared its ugly head many times in OT but to think that the sixers are better than the c's your ugly headed homerism has become a cerberus just shitting on all logic and reason. WP
  2.  
    Originally Posted by Lord Supremo View Post

    lol

    well sups i didnt pick them to win the whole damn thing did i?
    Thread Starter
  3. #jussayin
  4.  
    Originally Posted by coolhandkev View Post

    I'm real curious to see what the sixers defense does this year. I feel like you ran ridiculously above expectation last season defensively being only behind the Bulls and Cs. The two main reasons for the elite defensive efficiency were Iggy and your defensive rebounding. Then a big wtf occurs when you look at your offensive rebounding which was horrendous (25th in the NBA) which is what leads me to believe you just ran hot defensive rebounding wise and that helped your defensive efficiency numbers overall.

    traditionally teams with great defenses have poor offensive rebounding numbers because rather than go for the o-reb they are running back down the court and are set up to defend by the time the other team gets down there.
     
  5. yup. Celtics have been one of the worst o-rebounding teams in the nba for each of the past 5 years, they've been just fine.

    I think the sixers are either going to be very good or the same as last year. It all depends on Bynum's health and a thad young's scoring IMO. If he can take the next step as a player they could have a formidable scoring. I'm not seeing where they are going to get enough points from to make them better than the nets/knicks, let alone the c's. But like I said, I easily could have swapped them with the knicks and not really felt bad about it. Those 3 teams shouldn't be separated by more than a few games.
    Thread Starter
  6.  
    Originally Posted by zeppelinzoso16 View Post

    Derek Fisher gets burned by opposing pgs on the regular so Lakers management brings in Steve Nash to solve the problem. Lakers have to have some of the worst management in the league. Right down there with OKC

    I can't tell if this is a level or not. If it's a level well played if it's not you are officially the worst and most ignorant basketball poster in the history of the internet.
  7.  
    Originally Posted by Goldenad View Post

    traditionally teams with great defenses have poor offensive rebounding numbers because rather than go for the o-reb they are running back down the court and are set up to defend by the time the other team gets down there.

    I don't think I buy these as having a huge impact on each other. Maybe a small impact.

    Teams aren't great defensively because they neglect offensive rebounding.

    I mean just look at the Bulls last year - number 1 in defense and number 1 in offensive rebounding. Clearly attacking the offensive boards cost them little on the defensive end.

    @amartin - the celtics lack of rebounding last year was the difference in them being an above average team and being an elite team. If they could have just rebounded at close to an average rate they would have been in exactly the same tier as CHI, MIA, SA and OKC last season. The Bulls grabbed 13% more of their missed shots than Boston, imagine how many games the Celtics win last year with like an extra 5-6 offensive possessions each game, scary
  8.  
    Originally Posted by coolhandkev View Post

    I don't think I buy these as having a huge impact on each other. Maybe a small impact.

    Teams aren't great defensively because they neglect offensive rebounding.

    I mean just look at the Bulls last year - number 1 in defense and number 1 in offensive rebounding. Clearly attacking the offensive boards cost them little on the defensive end.

    here is an interesting read on the concept: http://hoopspeak.com/2012/10/8353/

    it even addresses the unique case of the bulls, "
    PS: So what the hell is Chicago doing at the top of both team defense and offensive rebounding? Well, how many teams have front courts as athletic and fast as Gibson, Noah, Asik, and Deng, not to mention the fact that Boozer has always been a good offensive rebounder. Add in Derrick Rose flying at the rim and drawing defenders from their box-out assignments and it makes a little more sense."
     
  9. Alex Kennedy ‏@AlexKennedyNBA
    Eddy Curry is expected to start at center tomorrow night in the Dallas Mavericks' opener against the Los Angeles Lakers.
    Thread Starter
  10.  
    Originally Posted by coolhandkev View Post


    @amartin - the celtics lack of rebounding last year was the difference in them being an above average team and being an elite team. If they could have just rebounded at close to an average rate they would have been in exactly the same tier as CHI, MIA, SA and OKC last season. The Bulls grabbed 13% more of their missed shots than Boston, imagine how many games the Celtics win last year with like an extra 5-6 offensive possessions each game, scary


    that's pretty debatable. They were elite the previous seasons with similar offensive rebounding numbers, and nearly made the finals. They weren't elite because they had 0 depth behind the starting 5 and couldn't score enough IMO.
    Thread Starter
  11.  
    Originally Posted by Goldenad View Post

    here is an interesting read on the concept: http://hoopspeak.com/2012/10/8353/

    it even addresses the unique case of the bulls, "
    PS: So what the hell is Chicago doing at the top of both team defense and offensive rebounding? Well, how many teams have front courts as athletic and fast as Gibson, Noah, Asik, and Deng, not to mention the fact that Boozer has always been a good offensive rebounder. Add in Derrick Rose flying at the rim and drawing defenders from their box-out assignments and it makes a little more sense."

    That is a good read, I like any basketball read that actually attempts to think outside the box and thinks logically about things as opposed to 98%+ of articles that are garbage.

    I still think while the correlation exists it's probably not that huge. The article itself says we really can't call it a direct relationship as of yet.

    Also the paragraph about the Bulls is iffy and kind of worded to benefit their point. Like the Celtics for instance also have a lightning fast point guard who breaks down defense and a freak athlete for a big man. Using Taj and Asik as examples when they played 20mpg and 14mpg respectively is reaching and ignoring Boozer who is unathletic as shit is a little iffy.

    I think you can definitely have your cake and eat it too by attacking the offensive boards and still getting back on defense and easily profit vs. doing one or the other.
  12.  
    Originally Posted by AMARTIN1181 View Post

    that's pretty debatable. They were elite the previous seasons with similar offensive rebounding numbers, and nearly made the finals. They weren't elite because they had 0 depth behind the starting 5 and couldn't score enough IMO.

    their elite seasons they grabbed 7% and 8% (08 and 09) more offensive boards than last year. That is enough to bridge the gap between the first and second tiered teams

    EDIT: also their defense was WAY better in 08 while still being way better off rebounding.

    Thibs FTW
    Edited By: coolhandkev Oct 29th, 2012 at 08:40 PM
  13.  
    Originally Posted by Z-Fresh View Post

    I can't tell if this is a level or not. If it's a level well played if it's not you are officially the worst and most ignorant basketball poster in the history of the internet.

    If it wan't for Alex Rodriguez Kobe would be the most overpaid player in American sports. Biggest weakness is stopping opposing pgs so you pick up Steve Nash who doesn't even have the word defense in his vocabulary. Hit the panic button and trade away your best player from last season. Had no bench last year and wont again. Another year of big names and no depth
    Edited By: Zeppelin Oct 29th, 2012 at 09:15 PM




  14.  
    Originally Posted by zeppelinzoso16 View Post

    If it wan't for Alex Rodriguez Kobe would be the most overpaid player in American sports. Biggest weakness is stopping opposing pgs so you pick up Steve Nash who doesn't even have the word defense in his vocabulary. Hit the panic button and trade away your best player from last season. Had no bench last year and wont again. Another year of big names and no depth

  15. Yeah, I think it's going to take the Lakers awhile to mesh.

    You can't just take Nash, Kobe, Artest, Gasol and Dwight, stick them on the floor together, say abracadabra and have a super team. They'll win plenty of games based on the sheer amount of talent they have, but they're going to go through growing pains. Hell, they'll win plenty of games based on Dwight Howard alone. Save for LeBron, he's probably the single most important player in this league.

    Considering their lack of depth and the fact that we're relying on Mike Woodson to put all the pieces of the puzzle together, I don't expect them to finish in the top two in the regular season. This isn't a team that I see built for the regular season. Talk about the Spurs and age...the Lakers aren't getting any younger, and Dwight might not be 100 percent. Plus they totally lack quality depth. I'm expecting 53 or 54 wins for them.
     
  16.  
    Originally Posted by Bullets43 View Post

    Lowry indeed great pickup, DeRozan is not a stud (hopefully shows significant growth in his game this year but doubtful), Valanciunas looks nice in preseason. Raptors have nice depth but lacking star power, will be exciting team to watch indeed, I could see 35-38 wins and in the East, that might put you in a race for 8th spot. Just thankful Steve Nash did not end up in Toronto, would have set the franchise back the 3-4 years left in his career.

     
    Originally Posted by AMARTIN1181 View Post

    The east has some horrible teams, they'll definitely be 9th-11th. But 38 wins ain't happening. Not yet.

    You say Derozan is a stud, but no mention of Bargnani or the Lithuanian super rook Valenciunas?

     
    Originally Posted by warden View Post

    not yet and not ever

     
    Originally Posted by Hughes4 View Post

    also, Dwane Casey

    Sorry guys, but Raptors will be making a playoff appearance this year.
    Edited By: Tracy_Ham Oct 29th, 2012 at 09:43 PM
    Reason: sp?
  17. The bottom part of the Eastern Conference is an absolute joke, and I'm fully anticipating a team 10 games (or more) under .500 making the playoffs. Right now I have the Hawks as the 8-seed and the Raptors as the 9-seed, but it wouldn't surprise me if the Raptors snuck into the playoffs this year with 34 or 35 wins.
     
  18. Stud was a strong word, you right about that. I think he'll show some significant improvement this year tho. I like what the raps are doing, but PLAYOFFFFFFFFFFS? no.
    Thread Starter
  19. LOL @ 6ers > Celtics. Just LOL
  20. i love ric flair gifs
  21.  
    Originally Posted by Niceguy View Post

    Your homerism has reared its ugly head many times in OT but to think that the sixers are better than the c's your ugly headed homerism has become a cerberus just shitting on all logic and reason. WP

    Lool give me a logical reason why the ancient Cs are any better than the sixers? Sixers were a top 4 team in the east last year and have vastly improved
  22. Sean can't handle the truth
  23.  
    Originally Posted by BigStack Husker View Post


    this is a great post what an amazing song can't hear that and be in a bad mood
  24. hawks are probably going to do better than the 8th seed. they might be like 4 or 5 considering they really didnt lose much by giving up joe johnson and getting lou williams and others.

    it should be a fun season to be a nets fan before the reality sets in that theyre the new hawks with the ceiling of the 2nd round! gogogo
     
  25.  
    Originally Posted by zeppelinzoso16 View Post

    Sean can't handle the truth

    Lol i think its ludacris to think the NYK or Nets are anywhere near as good and i think this squad is better than than the celtics, would be willing to take some bets on this too
  26.  
    Originally Posted by sean614 View Post

    Lool give me a logical reason why the ancient Cs are any better than the sixers? Sixers were a top 4 team in the east last year and have vastly improved

    Hmmm, could have sworn they finished 8th in the regular season after starting 20-9...

    Anyways, I take issue with saying that this team has vastly improved. Andrew Bynum is a roll of the dice, especially as a centerpiece. You lost Iguodala and Brand, your most versatile player and best defender (Iggy) and a solid asset in Brand.

    If Bynum stays healthy, steps his game up and plays like a premier center, then yeah, you've improved. But that's a huge question mark.

    The Celtics (while slightly overrated...I think they win right around 50 games) have Rondo, who now has the keys to the car. Their bench is deep with Terry, Green and Bradley as way-above-average bench guys. They're about 8-10 wins better than Philly.
     
  27.  
    Originally Posted by marinersheep View Post

    If Bynum stays healthy, steps his game up and plays like a premier center, then yeah, you've improved. But that's a huge question mark.
    .

    If Bynum stays healthy he is going to be a superstar. He has already stepped up his game and was already a premier center when Kobe wasn't on the court. Bynum was the lakers best player last season. I was kidding earlier about Lakers management obviously, but it is amazing that people don't recognize how good Bynum is.
    Edited By: Zeppelin Oct 30th, 2012 at 12:09 AM
  28.  
    Originally Posted by sean614 View Post

    Lol i think its ludacris to think the NYK or Nets are anywhere near as good and i think this squad is better than than the celtics, would be willing to take some bets on this too

    ill bet the nets and celtics both finish with better records than the 76ers. $100 per team?
     
Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 51 2 3 4 5