[x]Register Now
Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
Am I the only one who hates this rule? I know that it probably will never change, and that the arguement for coaches leaving and getting to coach right away is bogus, but if a kid is uncomfortable at a school he shouldnt have to sacrifice a year of his life for the NCAA.
-
Contracted to play for a school (and get everything paid for). Break that contract, penalty.
One year is fair IMO -
But its the only division that has this rule...and not to beat the coach thing to death, but they sign the same type of contract (and get paid large sums of dough), and can jet whenever they feel like it.
-
It's fair, it sucks but it makes the recruit have to find a good fit.
-
Go visit each place, talk to other guys on the current team who go there, other people who have visited, etc etc. If they are a d1 athlete being recruited they for sure have a large network of other players who would be able to assist them in decision making. Pretty much any place you go is going to obviously do as much as they can to make things comfortable for you as well.
-
Coaches can bolt, but they usually have to pay a buy out in their contract which can cost them or the school they are going to a decent chunk of money.
-
the rule also keeps the massive amount of kids at lower levels fro transferring up on the idea they might make it. most of those kids will just put themselves in debt and regret the choice. it would also hurt the lower divisions significantly.
Edited By: MacEwen Feb 8th, 2011 at 05:46 AM -
just wanna point out here how maryland's d coordinator leaves for uconn (............) 3 days after signing day, which is ridiculously shady. pretty embarrassing.
Edited By: heavyj80 Feb 8th, 2011 at 05:45 AM
[SIZE=2]Here’s a quote from Dorleant (to Matt Bracken of the Sun) which I think sums it all up:
“He was the biggest reason I was going to go and play there,” Dorleant said. “If he made the decision a week before Signing Day, I definitely wouldn’t be going to Maryland. And I mean, there’s nothing I can really do now"[/SIZE]
team interviewing randy shannon (juan time ?) -
well in those cases the fresh can transfer and use his redshirt while sitting out. he would just have to pay for the first year.
-
Whats the full rule?
If you sign and a coach leaves you are stuck right?
If you are a redshirt fresh or sophomore and your coach leaves you cant xfer no penalties right?
Whats the problem here?
You sign with the school not coach. But if you sign stay in that ambiance for a year then he leaves...you should be able to leave. Perfect rule IMO. Unless Im missing something which I may. -
Couldn't of said it better myself, most people forget how much these athletes really do receive in return for playing a sport that they would be playing no matter whether they were at said college or not. They have hardship waivers for a reason, and for the most part people that deserve one usually get one.
Edited By: $ayChee$e Feb 8th, 2011 at 06:04 AM -
If this was started for LD fag then it has meaning. A junior cannot xfer no matter what(exception bayloir almost dealth penalty) and not it out.
-
Kids would transfer every year to play with their friends
-
Originally Posted by budo09
Contracted to play for a school (and get everything paid for). Break that contract, penalty.
One year is fair IMOEntering into contracts to provide a service is unacceptable to the NCCA right? I was under the impression a player could not sign away his likeness, rights, or services and retain amateur status(eligibility). The way you put it, then it's safe to say the NCAA is hypocritical and should go fuck itself?Originally Posted by $ayChee$e
Couldn't of said it better myself, most people forget how much these athletes really do receive in return for playing a sport that they would be playing no matter whether they were at said college or not. They have hardship waivers for a reason, and for the most part people that deserve one usually get one.
-
a junior can transfer he just has to sit out a year.
-
no am you still have to sit out a year, but if the school doesn't release you you can't play on scholly for another school.
-
i don't know about that, i'm talking about football.
-
i don't know if there are, but that is the rule for football.
Edited By: MacEwen Feb 8th, 2011 at 06:51 AM -
Edited By: Tread Feb 8th, 2011 at 01:23 PMContracted? Yes, until the school decides they want to fuck you over. Funny how the school never has any penalties when they break the contract.Originally Posted by budo09
Contracted to play for a school (and get everything paid for). Break that contract, penalty.
One year is fair IMO
http://oversigning.com/testing/ -
Edited By: ripomatic Feb 8th, 2011 at 02:16 PM
whole bunch of mis-information in this thread......
each NCAA sport is different in the context of how this rule effects students.
and we wonder why there is no D1 football championship.
one should read Ron polks rant before making un-informed judgements!
http://www.clarionledger.com/assets/pdf/D085828917.PDF









