-
Hey there Dyz - how's it been going?
-
Updated delegate count. Ron Paul is closer than the establishment would like you to think.
http://thereal2012delegatecount.com/ -
Sorry for my ignorance but what happens to Santorum and Gingrich's delegates?
Also Ron Paul for tha win! -
What happens to the delegates if a candidate drops out?
Originally Posted by acecatcher26
Sorry for my ignorance but what happens to Santorum and Gingrich's delegates?
Also Ron Paul for tha win!
by admin on Wed Feb 08, 2012 12:01 pm
Many people have asked these question and the answers are ver simple.
"What happens to the delegates of a candidate that drops out of the race"
Any candidate that drops out prior to the convention automatically unbinds their delegates. This means regardless of party rule those delegates are free to vote for whom they wish.
"What if the candidate that drops out endorses another candidate"
Even if a candidate endorses another candidate it in no way binds their delegates to their endorsement, those delegates are still free to vote for whom they wish. -
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-jokes-cl...050818816.html
How does that work, I thought max you could contribute was $2.5k during the primary and another $2.5k during general?
Why is it that RP is playing by the rules more than Romney yet every word used has negative connotation. Why was nothing said in North Dakota or the Virgin Islands when Romney received more delegates that would be expected?
Watching Good Morning America and they played a clip of Romney's response to the bullying claim and he's basically laughing through his response, ya, if I hurt someone I'd probably apologize . . . you can just tell the guy a rich dickhead -
Originally Posted by gamma21
How would it be a hijacking? Following the rules put in place by the establishment is underhanded and sneaky?
mostly to dyz/gamma: yes, hijacking the will of the people. who chose romney. I couldn't imagine voting for someone who tried to steal the nominationOriginally Posted by LVpokerdealer
If rule 38 holds to be true....then basically all of the RP delegates chosen that we thought had to vote for Romney on the first ballot basically can now vote for RP....and also there were a lot of santorum/newt/romney delegates chosen that were actually RP supporters.....
Does this mean he has more than Romney? Probably not. But it sure is exciting as a RP supporter. -
Wong. The Romney supporters are just to stupid to figure it out.
-
you would be ok with it if rp won the vast majority of votes but then romney's team got the delegates and nominated romney? lol
the reason for delegates to have discretion is if the presumptive nominee got caught with kiddy porn and shit, not to just decide everyone else is wrong -
And you still don't understand the difference between a Republic and a Democracy.
Originally Posted by norcaljeff
you would be ok with it if rp won the vast majority of votes but then romney's team got the delegates and nominated romney? lol
the reason for delegates to have discretion is if the presumptive nominee got caught with kiddy porn and shit, not to just decide everyone else is wrong -
lol NCJ...why couldn't you imagine voting for RP? You've already wanted to vote for like 5 diff candidates already...what's the big deal with changing your mind once more?
Ohhh and latest rassmussen poll with independents has RP tied with Obama -
they have had him in other skits before, wonder why he wasnt in that one.
Originally Posted by zeppelinzoso16
Pretty cool representation of Ron Paul on SNL
http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-li...7214?auto=true -
"If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. I think conservatism is really a misnomer just as liberalism is a misnomer for the liberals–if we were back in the days of the Revolution, so-called conservatives today would be the Liberals and the liberals would be the Tories. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is."
-Ronald Reagan
Damn you, Ronald Reagan. Why do you hate the Republican party so much?
Maybe they don't want to lump him in with the rest of the ass clowns. -
think so? lol?
Originally Posted by gamma21
And you still don't understand the difference between a Republic and a Democracy.
makes sense, because...wait, what?Originally Posted by Geoff Moore
"I couldn't imagine voting for someone who tried to steal the nomination.." -norcaljeff

because he isn't and shouldn't be the nominee, as he was not picked (and because he has the foreign policy of a retarded child, but that's completely irrelevant).Originally Posted by LVpokerdealer
lol NCJ...why couldn't you imagine voting for RP? You've already wanted to vote for like 5 diff candidates already...what's the big deal with changing your mind once more?
Ohhh and latest rassmussen poll with independents has RP tied with Obama
which candidates did I "want" to vote for again? Do you even remember...ehhh forget it. -
I just hate his refusal to use drones. and his refusal to wiretap terrorists on the other side of the planet. seems old-fashioned. like he was living in the 1700's or something.
Edited By: norcaljeff May 11th, 2012 at 11:47 PM
ps so you would be happy if romney delegates picked romney if rp had the majority of votes?
@ krispy: we shouldn't have the war on terror. we should have...um...surrender? hope they'll leave us alone? stop being so mean to people so the terrorists forgive all our mean deeds? you tell me -
Delegates pick the nominee, not straw polls.
-
I would be happy if Romney was using the rules established by his own party, and utilizing the process the founders envisioned. The thing that really bothers me about your thinking ncj, is that you somehow think RP isn't a Republican just because he doesn't adhere to the NeoCon way of thinking. Ron Paul is simply running on the platform that resembles what the GOP used to stand for. It's fine if you disagree with him, but it's ridiculous to act like there should only be one way of thinking in the Republican Party. I wonder why you don't take issue with following a philosophy that was established by ex-Dems? I wonder if you would have thought a great man like Dwight Eisenhower would have been a nut for telling the American people to watch out for the military industrial complex? Poor ncj, following an ideology that wanted the Vietnam War to continue, despite the "will of the people."
Originally Posted by norcaljeff
I just hate his refusal to use drones. and his refusal to wiretap terrorists on the other side of the planet. seems old-fashioned. like he was living in the 1700's or something.
ps so you would be happy if romney delegates picked romney if rp had the majority of votes?
@ krispy: we shouldn't have the war on terror. we should have...um...surrender? hope they'll leave us alone? stop being so mean to people so the terrorists forgive all our mean deeds? you tell me -
yup. so you think it is fine if the vast majority of repub voters pick romney but the delegates stage a coup - I mean, exercise their rights - to vote for someone else? (barring some giant scandal obv)
rp isn't a repub? tf?Originally Posted by gamma21
I would be happy if Romney was using the rules established by his own party, and utilizing the process the founders envisioned. The thing that really bothers me about your thinking ncj, is that you somehow think RP isn't a Republican just because he doesn't adhere to the NeoCon way of thinking. Ron Paul is simply running on the platform that resembles what the GOP used to stand for. It's fine if you disagree with him, but it's ridiculous to act like there should only be one way of thinking in the Republican Party. I wonder why you don't take issue with following a philosophy that was established by ex-Dems? I wonder if you would have thought a great man like Dwight Eisenhower would have been a nut for telling the American people to watch out for the military industrial complex? Poor ncj, following an ideology that wanted the Vietnam War to continue, despite the "will of the people."
one way of thinking? is someone stopping rp from thinking some way? he's free to have idiotic head-in-sand make-believe-world ideas. I'm just glad he can't execute them. like I am sad he can't execute his good ideas. Why is it you think there is no room for ideas other than rp's foreign policy ideas? -
Stopping the "war on terror" isn't surrendering. Who is it we would even be surrendering to? If we stop the war on drugs, are we surrendering to drug dealers?
Originally Posted by norcaljeff
@ krispy: we shouldn't have the war on terror. we should have...um...surrender? hope they'll leave us alone? stop being so mean to people so the terrorists forgive all our mean deeds? you tell me
Even if you think we should always be at war in a philosophical sense, because you believe the baddies are always out to get us, we still can't afford it.. don't really see anyone defending the price of all this shit -
not really sure what "stopping the war on terror" means. Can you explain it?
can't afford what? two invasions of countries? is someone advocating that we do that? -
If we didnt use delegates and instead used popular vote wouldnt Gore have been president instead of Bush?
-
Don't see the issue with a fringe group yelling the loudest and being the most active getting the nomination over the will of the people...
Similar Threads
-
29 Replies
***Official 2012 Presidential Election Thread***
By clemsonrich in Off Topic
Last Post: Nov 6th, 2011, 05:47 PM - 18 Replies
-
316 Replies
****Official John McCain-Barack Obama Presidential Debate Thread****
Last Post: Oct 8th, 2008, 11:12 PM -
15 Replies
*OFFICIAL* non-poker related Ron Paul thread
Last Post: Dec 17th, 2007, 02:05 PM -
0 Replies
Official Steve Paul Ambrose Voice Crack Thread
By luckybacon in Off Topic
Last Post: Sep 25th, 2006, 04:54 AM










