Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. From Wikipedia:

    Operation Northwoods, or Northwoods, was a false-flag conspiracy plan, proposed within the United States government in 1962. The plan called for CIA or other operatives to commit apparent acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Castro-led Cuba. One plan was to "develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington".

    This operation is especially notable in that it included plans for hijackings and bombings followed by the use of phony evidence that would blame the terrorist acts on a foreign government, namely Cuba.

    ------------------------------

    Documents scanned from the National Archives
    http://media.nara.gov/media/images/36/15/36-1469a.jpg
    http://media.nara.gov/media/images/36/15/36-1470a.jpg
    http://media.nara.gov/media/images/36/15/36-1471a.jpg
    http://media.nara.gov/media/images/36/15/36-1472a.jpg
    http://media.nara.gov/media/images/36/15/36-1473a.jpg

    ---------------------------------

    So since it seems that everytime people bring up 9/11 truth they want to lump everybody in with people who believe no planes were hijacked, or there were holograms, or all sorts of other BS that purposely makes 9/11 truthers look crazy I'm starting this thread where I will post credible information that suggests the government has not told the whole truth about what happened on 9/11.
  2. Yes, that definitely suggests the government has not told the whole truth about what happened on 9/11. The non-incident entitled Operation Northwoods is delicately intertwined with 9/11, no doubt.

  3. future advice:

    When trying to make a point, if your only source is Wikipedia you will lose a lot of credit.
  4.  
    Originally Posted by DUBZX View Post


    future advice:

    When trying to make a point, if your only source is Wikipedia you will lose a lot of credit.

    future advice:

    you should at least scan the whole post before you open your mouth
    Thread Starter
  5.  
    Originally Posted by MUPokerPlayer View Post

    Yes, that definitely suggests the government has not told the whole truth about what happened on 9/11. The non-incident entitled Operation Northwoods is delicately intertwined with 9/11, no doubt.

    more is following, it's just step 1 for the whole "the government loves you and would never lie to us crowd"
    Thread Starter
  6.  
    Originally Posted by alwest View Post

    I will post credible information that suggests the government has not told the whole truth about what happened on 9/11.

    Well you are off to a flying start!!! Your "credible information" amounts to false flag operation over 40 yrs ago that was never carried out.

    Is this some type of chaos theory reasoning; the govt. flaps its wings in 1962 and bombs are planted in the World trade Center in 2001??

    My contribution to the "credible information:" Remember the Maine!!!
  7.  
    Originally Posted by alwest View Post

     
    Originally Posted by MUPokerPlayer View Post

    Yes, that definitely suggests the government has not told the whole truth about what happened on 9/11. The non-incident entitled Operation Northwoods is delicately intertwined with 9/11, no doubt.

    more is following, it's just step 1 for the whole "the government loves you and would never lie to us crowd"

    Please make sure you consolidate these into one thread. I wouldn't want to have to use the hide thread anymore than I have to this morning.
  8. i typed it?? open mouth

    and as i was saying when i opened and saw wikipedia i said bs and stopped reading.

    which was my point
  9. You are obviously right since you found this information on the internet.


  10. actually, it's a good book, I enjoyed it....
     
  11. 50 years ago some guy proposed something and nothing ever happened? good to know
  12. or did it?

    dun dun dun... (not sure how to spell that sound effect)
  13. About 10 years ago I had planned to have a nasty 3-way with Salma Hayek & Julia Roberts. Just because I planned it doesn't mean that I actually did it.
  14. http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHART...eisraelis.html

    http://www.beirut.indymedia.org/en/2006/12/6287.shtml

    <h2><span id="c-title">The Five Dancing Israelis Arrested On 9-11</span></h2>
    from Michael Rivero -

    On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick reply was: "It's very good…….Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel)"

    The Five Dancing Israelis Arrested On 9-11

    As the world watched in disbelief and asked the question...

    ...Mossad operatives were seen dancing with joy.

    A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle of themselves on 9-11.

    The New York Times reported Thursday that a group of five men had set up video cameras aimed at the Twin Towers prior to the attack on Tuesday, and were seen congratulating one another afterwards. (1)

    Police received several calls from angry New Jersey residents claiming "middle-eastern" men with a white van were videotaping the disaster with shouts of joy and mockery. (2)

    "They were like happy, you know … They didn't look shocked to me" said a witness. (3)

    [T]hey were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept. 11 making fun of the World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph themselves in front of the wreckage. (4)

    Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park after the initial impact (5). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken, and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives in a Jersey City parking lot. (6)

    "It looked like they're hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park." (7)

    One anonymous phone call to the authorities actually led them to close down all of New York's bridges and tunnels. The mystery caller told the 9-1-1 dispatcher that a group of Palestinians were mixing a bomb inside of a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel. Here's the transcript from NBC News:

    Dispatcher: Jersey City police.
    Caller: Yes, we have a white van, 2 or 3 guys in there, they look like Palestinians and going around a building.
    Caller: There's a minivan heading toward the Holland tunnel, I see the guy by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniform.
    Dispatcher: He has what?
    Caller: He's dressed like an Arab. (8)

    (*Writer's note: Why would this mystery caller specifically say that these "Arabs" were Palestinians? How would he know that? Palestinians usually dress in western style clothes, not "sheikh uniforms")

    Based on that phone call, police then issued a "Be-on-the-Lookout" alert for a white mini-van heading for the city's bridges and tunnels from New Jersey. When a van fitting that exact description was stopped just before crossing into New York, the suspicious "middle-easterners" were apprehended. Imagine the surprise of the police officers when these terror suspects turned out to be Israelis!
    According to ABC’s 20/20, when the van belonging to the cheering Israelis was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers:

    "We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem." (9)

    Why did he feel that Palestinians were a problem for the NYPD?

    The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious when they found maps of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same items that the hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports. Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives. (10)

    The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of which shows Sivan Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smouldering ruins in an apparently celebratory gesture. (11)

    The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a bomb was stopped as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity of the suspects was not revealed. Here's what the Jerusalem Post reported on September 12, 2001:

    Click for full size

    American security services overnight stopped a car bomb on the George Washington Bridge. The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on an approach ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to blow up the main crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported. (12)

    It was reported that three men were arrested and the van contained tonnes of explosives (13).

    What's really intriguing is that ABC's 20/20 (14), the New York Post (15), and the New Jersey Bergen Record (16) all clearly and unambiguously reported that a white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3, which leads directly to the Lincoln Tunnel.

    But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz Sheva) (17), and Yediot America, (18) all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that a white van with Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington Bridge, which is several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.

    It appears as if there may actually have been two white vans involved, one stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the conflicting reports as to the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so many credible eye-witnesses all saw celebrating "middle-easterners" in a white van in so many different locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon (lawyer for the 5 Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but later increased the total to five.

    Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a bomb while the other was meant to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back into New Jersey? If a van was to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly the drivers would need to have a "get-away van" to pick them up and escape. And notice how the van (or vans) stayed away from the third major crossing -the Holland Tunnel- which was where the police had originally been directed to by that anti-Palestinian 9-1-1 "mystery caller". A classic misdirection play.

    From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious. The Israelis worked for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An American employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey that a majority of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the attacks.

    The employee, who declined to give his name said: "I was in tears. These guys were joking and that bothered me." These guys were like, "Now America knows what we go through." (19)

    A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System's Israeli owner, Dominick Suter, dropped his business and fled the country for Israel. He was in such a hurry to flee America that some of Urban Moving System's customers were left with their furniture stranded in storage facilities (20).

    It was later confirmed that the five detained Israelis were in fact Mossad agents (21). They were held in custody for 71 days before being quietly released. Some of the movers had been kept in solitary confinement for 40 days. (22)

    Several of the detainees discussed their experience in America on an Israeli talk show after their return home. Said one of the men, denying that they were laughing or happy on the morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event." (23)
    wmv video download

    How did they know there would be an event to document on 9/11?
    It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of the dancing Israeli Mossad agents - here's the most logical scenario:

    1. The Israeli "movers" cheered the 9-11 attacks to celebrate the successful accomplishment of the greatest spy operation ever pulled off in history.
    2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-1-1 police dispatcher to report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel.

    3. Having thus pre-framed the Palestinians with this phone call, the Israeli bombers then head for the George Washington Bridge instead, where they will drop off their time-bomb van and escape with Urban Moving accomplices.

    4. But the police react very wisely and proactively by closing off ALL bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This move inadvertently foils the Israelis' misdirection play and leads to their own capture and 40 day torture.

    5. To cover up this story, the U.S. Justice Department rounds up over 1000 Arabs for minor immigration violations and places them in New York area jails. The Israelis therefore become less conspicuous as the government and media can now claim that the Israelis were just immigration violators caught in the same dragnet as many other Arabs.

    6. After several months, FBI and Justice Department "higher-ups" are able to gradually push aside the local FBI agents and free the Israelis quietly.

    Osama bin Laden was immediately blamed for the 9/11 attacks even though he had no previous record of doing anything on this scale. Immediately after the Flight 11 hit World Trade Center 1
    CIA Director George Tenet said "You know, this has bin Laden's fingerprints all over it." (24)

    The compliant mainstream media completely ignored the Israeli connection. Immediately following the 9-11 attacks the media was filled with stories linking the attacks to bin Laden. TV talking-heads, "experts", and scribblers of every stripe spoon-fed a gullible American public a steady diet of the most outrageous propaganda imaginable.

    We were told that the reason bin Laden attacked the USA was because he hates our "freedom" and "democracy". The Muslims were "medieval" and they wanted to destroy us because they envied our wealth, were still bitter about the Crusades, and were offended by Britney Spears shaking her tits and ass all over the place!

    But bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and suggested that Zionists orchestrated the
    9-11 attacks. The BBC published bin Laden's statement of denial in which he said:

    "I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States." (25)

    You never heard that quote on your nightly newscast did you?

    number of intelligence officials have raised questions about Osama bin Laden's capabilities. "This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and he's running this operation?" one C.I.A. official asked. "It's so huge. He couldn't have done it alone." A senior military officer told me that because of the visas and other documentation needed to infiltrate team members into the United States a major foreign intelligence service might also have been involved. (26)

    Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of 9/11 by the FBI:

    When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page (27), [Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI] said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.” (28)

    To date, the only shred of “evidence” to be uncovered against bin Laden is a barely audible fuzzy amateur video that the Pentagon just happened to find "lying around" in Afghanistan. How very convenient, and how very fake. (29)

    There is no evidence, be it hard or circumstantial, to link the Al Qaeda "terrorist network" to these acts of terror, but there is a mountain of evidence, both hard and circumstantial, which suggests that Zionists have been very busy framing Arabs for terror plots against America.

    One final point - at 09:40 on 9/11 it was reported that the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility for the attacks (30). This claim was immediately denied by the DFLP leader Qais abu Leila who said it had always opposed "terror attacks on civilian targets, especially outside the occupied territories." (31)

    9/11 CNN streamed RealVideo item mentioning a Palestinian claim of responsibility

    Why would a Palestinian organisation comprising of less than 500 people (32) make the suicidal move of immediately claiming responsibility for the attacks?

    Sharon and the other Israeli leaders aspire to fulfil what the goals of the political Zionist movement have been since its origin a century ago: to turn all of historic Palestine into an exclusively Jewish state. A central tenet of the Zionist ideology is expressed in the racist slogan, "A land without people for a people without a land." (33)

    The implication of Palestinians in the 9/11 attacks would have handed Zionists a golden opportunity to achieve the above because all Palestinians would have been labelled terrorists.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."
    US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring.

    "By way of deception, thou shalt do war"
    Motto of the Mossad
    Thread Starter
  15. you are a fucking idiot. unreal
  16.  
    Originally Posted by alwest View Post

    Police received several calls from angry New Jersey residents claiming "middle-eastern" men with a white van were videotaping the disaster with shouts of joy and mockery

     
    Originally Posted by alwest View Post

    Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park after the initial impact (5). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken, and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives in a Jersey City parking lot.

    I'm sure highly trained Mossad top spies were so stupid as to be jumping around with joy in the middle of a tragedy that they caused...very sneaky and spy-like of them to stand out in the middle of a suddenly very suspicious crowd.

    And another thing this failed to point out is why they would bother videotaping the attacks in the first place? All that would do is leave evidence that they were involved...wtf is the point of videotaping this??? Make a training video?
  17.  
    Originally Posted by norcaljeff View Post

    you are a fucking idiot. unreal

    SMFTHIS

    Can we please get a ban hammer going for anyone that is so fucking stupid that they are simply robbing oxygen that is better served for others?
  18. National Institute of Standards and Technology admits WTC buildings fell at free fall speed, inconsistent with a building just "collapsing".

    http://www.ae911truth.org/flashmov13.htm

    http://www.ae911truth.org/flashmov14.htm
    http://www.ae911truth.org/flashmov15.htm
    Thread Starter
  19. There's a .pdf floating around somewhere that basically destroys the 9/11 "truth" case. This is the best I could find without looking too hard.

    Link

    You must understand, a true skeptic is one that is skeptical even of those that claim to be skeptics themselves. Alex Jones is a fanatical fearmonger and the whole 9/11 truth movement is getting way to friendly with the fascist/racist far right.

    Edit - I do think there are unresolved questions, and I do think the Bush administration used the attacks as they would a false flag attack. However, coming up with your own bs answers is not a solution.
  20.  
    Originally Posted by Mr. Smith View Post

     
    Originally Posted by alwest View Post

    I will post credible information that suggests the government has not told the whole truth about what happened on 9/11.

    Well you are off to a flying start!!! Your "credible information" amounts to false flag operation over 40 yrs ago that was never carried out.

    Is this some type of chaos theory reasoning; the govt. flaps its wings in 1962 and bombs are planted in the World trade Center in 2001??

    My contribution to the "credible information:" Remember the Maine!!!

    Mr. Smith pwns as usual

    always makes me lol

    edit: oh yeah put the OP on the list haha
  21. It was never carried out because JFK overturned it at the last moment. Just shows that they did have the idea of creating false flag terror events in the past, history has a way of repeating itself. Do you think George W. would have overturned the plans for operation northwoods had it come onto his desk?
  22.  
    Originally Posted by sheridan204 View Post

    Do you think George W. would have overturned the plans for operation northwoods had it come onto his desk?

    This is like a Christian asking an Atheist, "what if you're wrong?"

    The question is a logical fallacy.

    Do your own research, don't listen to the talking heads propping up this conspiracy business, most of them are in it for the money/fame.
  23. I agree with you on doing your own research. The part about not listening to the talking heads should be applied to both the conspiracy theorists and the mass media in my opinion.
  24. What is wrong w Wikipedia? Did I miss a memo?

    <SPAN>lol @ dolts that can’t read/think for themselves and winnow the wheat from the chaff and are, therefore, scared of wikipedia/information that isn't spoonfed to them by "trusted" sources. </SPAN>
  25. I think you did...*MEMO* wikipedia is unreliable and we have been having some problems with your TPS reports.
  26. all levels aside,
    When it comes to 9/11, people should just look on both sides and weigh the odds of which story is more likely to be true. I never wanted to believe that the government was involved in this but I can't really help it. From watching countless videos there is just waay too much information pushing me to believe this way. I know that a bit, some or even most of the information may not be 100% correct but even if just a few of those things are correct, like they had the bomb sniffing dogs removed from the wtc for a few days before 9/11, and WTC 7 just collapsin for shits and giggles.

    I just think people should keep an open mind on this and weigh which story seems more believable. I don't care if you do think osama and his crew jacked those planes or whatever, but you should at least have a reason explaining why you believe that way, rather than just insult and get angry at anyone for thinking otherwise.
     
  27. Anyone that thinks that our govt isnt CAPABLE of pulling off 9/11 is ignorant imo. Im not saying that 100% our govt did it. I do believe that they had a hand in it however there is just way too much evidence that points that way. My cousin was in front of the WTC coming out of the subway on her way to work and saw the explosions never once said she saw a plane never heard a plane no nothing.

    Also what was it like a 26' hole in the pentagon? Yea sorry a boeing 747 isnt going to ball up into a 26' in diameter hunk of medal when it hits and not have any other points of impact or anything like that. The pentagon is what really sets this off I think.
    Everything about it points to a cruise missile hitting it. And there was also an unidentified unmarked white "fighter" plane spotted in the skies seconds before the explosions at the pentagon.

    So yea eff all the politicians and secret agencies that are just looking out for their own monetary interests. Cause when it comes down to it, this world and our country is about money. Wars arent about peace. Theyre about power and money. In the Iraqi war it happens to be about oil, which comes down to money.
  28.  
    Originally Posted by Bawsten View Post

    Also what was it like a 26' hole in the pentagon? Yea sorry a boeing 747 isnt going to ball up into a 26' in diameter hunk of medal when it hits and not have any other points of impact or anything like that. The pentagon is what really sets this off I think.
    Everything about it points to a cruise missile hitting it. And there was also an unidentified unmarked white "fighter" plane spotted in the skies seconds before the explosions at the pentagon.

    <span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT"><h1>The Pentagon</h1> At 9:37 am on 9/11, 51 minutes after the first plane hit the World Trade Center, the Pentagon was similarly attacked. Though dozens of witnesses saw a <nobr id="itxt_nobr_0_0">Boeing</nobr> 757 hit the building, conspiracy advocates insist there is evidence that a missile or a different type of plane smashed into the Pentagon.

    HQ Attack: Taken three days after 9/11, this photo shows the extent of the damage to the Pentagon, consistent with a fiery plane crash. (Photograph by Department of Defense)

    <h3>Big Plane, Small Holes</h3> <span>Claim:</span> Two holes were visible in the Pentagon immediately after the attack: a 75-ft.-wide entry hole in the building's exterior wall, and a 16-ft.-wide hole in Ring C, the Pentagon's middle ring. Conspiracy theorists claim both holes are far too small to have been made by a Boeing 757. "How does a plane 125 ft. wide and 155 ft. long fit into a hole which is only 16 ft. across?" asks reopen911.org, a Web site "dedicated to discovering the bottom line truth to what really occurred on September 11, 2001."

    The truth is of even less importance to French author Thierry Meyssan, whose baseless assertions are fodder for even mainstream European and Middle Eastern media. In his book The Big Lie, Meyssan concludes that the Pentagon was struck by a satellite-guided missile — part of an elaborate U.S. military coup. "This attack," he writes, "could only be committed by United States military personnel against other U.S. military personnel."


    Hole Truth: Flight 77's landing gear punched a 12-ft. hole into the Pentagon's Ring C. (Photograph by Department of Defense)

    <span>FACT:</span> When American Airlines Flight 77 hit the Pentagon's exterior wall, Ring E, it created a hole approximately 75 ft. wide, according to the ASCE Pentagon Building Performance Report. The exterior facade collapsed about 20 minutes after impact, but ASCE based its measurements of the original hole on the number of first-floor support columns that were destroyed or damaged. Computer simulations confirmed the findings.

    Why wasn't the hole as wide as a 757's 124-ft.-10-in. wingspan? A crashing jet doesn't punch a cartoon-like outline of itself into a reinforced concrete building, says ASCE team member Mete Sozen, a professor of structural engineering at Purdue University. In this case, one wing hit the ground; the other was sheared off by the force of the impact with the Pentagon's load-bearing columns, explains Sozen, who specializes in the behavior of concrete buildings. What was left of the plane flowed into the structure in a state closer to a liquid than a solid mass. "If you expected the entire wing to cut into the building," Sozen tells PM, "it didn't happen."

    The tidy hole in Ring C was 12 ft. wide — not 16 ft. ASCE concludes it was made by the jet's landing gear, not by the fuselage.

    <h3>Intact Windows</h3> <span>Claim:</span> Many Pentagon windows remained in one piece — even those just above the point of impact from the Boeing 757 passenger plane. Pentagonstrike.co.uk, an online animation widely circulated in the United States and Europe, claims that photographs showing "intact windows" directly above the crash site prove "a missile" or "a craft much smaller than a 757" struck the Pentagon.

    <span>FACT:</span> Some windows near the impact area did indeed survive the crash. But that's what the windows were supposed to do — they're blast-resistant.

    "A blast-resistant window must be designed to resist a force significantly higher than a hurricane that's hitting instantaneously," says Ken Hays, executive vice president of Masonry Arts, the Bessemer, Ala., company that designed, manufactured and installed the Pentagon windows. Some were knocked out of the walls by the crash and the outer ring's later collapse. "They were not designed to receive wracking seismic force," Hays notes. "They were designed to take in inward pressure from a blast event, which apparently they did: [Before the collapse] the blinds were still stacked neatly behind the window glass."

    <h3>Flight 77 Debris</h3> <span>Claim:</span> Conspiracy theorists insist there was no plane wreckage at the Pentagon. "In reality, a Boeing 757 was never found," claims pentagonstrike.co.uk, which asks the question, "What hit the Pentagon on 9/11?"

    Aftermath: Wreckage from Flight 77 on the Pentagon's lawn — proof that a passenger plane, not a missile, hit the building. (Photograph by AP/Wide World Photos)

    <span>FACT:</span> Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?"</span>
  29. MUPP there is no room for common sense and factual articles in this thread.

Similar Threads