Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. -400 on Vikings Team total to be under 43.5.

    So basically risking $400 to win $100.

    Thanks!
  2. what site is this. i like
  3. Joe Webb laughs at you
  4. Some site through my bookie. It's not one of the major ones. A little worried Favre might play today though. He got updated from "OUT" to "questionable".[SIZE=3][/SIZE]
    Thread Starter
  5.  
    Originally Posted by y0y0y0y0y083 View Post

    Some site through my bookie. It's not one of the major ones. A little worried Favre might play today though. He got updated from "OUT" to "questionable".[SIZE=3][/SIZE]

    If Favre plays then its a lock for the under.
  6. Mine says u42.5 (-300), but assumed that was the game total and not the team total.
  7. Lol if thats just the Vikings team total then you got a sick steal.
  8.  
    Originally Posted by sharkzilla1 View Post

    Lol if thats just the Vikings team total then you got a sick steal.

    yea im like 99% sure he is reading that wrong.
  9.  
    Originally Posted by Jaybone2315 View Post

    yea im like 99% sure he is reading that wrong.



    Yeah I thought about this, but it's kinda weird. That is why I am calling to confirm.

    It has it under SUPER TOTALS= combined total points. And the teams are listed as GB vs. Patriots. The thing is if it is listed wrong, why is it showing each team oppose to the over/under spread for the game. The way it is listed seems like it would be team total to me, but again I could be wrong.
    Edited By: y0y0y0y0y083 Dec 20th, 2010 at 09:07 PM
    Reason: Realized I can't just copy and paste. Anyone know how to post screenshots.
    Thread Starter
  10.  
    Originally Posted by y0y0y0y0y083 View Post

    -400 on Vikings Team total to be under 43.5.

    So basically risking $400 to win $100.

    Thanks!

    uhhhhhhh - that's prob total yards gained for Vikes -LOL

    Minus 10* wind chill and the total for the game is 33.5
  11. Lesson one, virgin gambler. O/U is for the game, not the team...

    I still like the under, but it's not a wonderful price.

    it even says combined total points in your description above, where's the confusion?
  12.  
    Originally Posted by zander View Post

    Lesson one, virgin gambler. O/U is for the game, not the team...

    I still like the under, but it's not a wonderful price.

    it even says combined total points in your description above, where's the confusion?


    You really think that the under for the game is -400?

    Somethings clearly wrong here, but im not going to say that its definitely the game total when its -400
     
  13. Betting with bookies seems like such a hassle.

    Can't you guys just go to the casino and place them?
  14. I just saw this "adjusted" line dot dot dot

    Under 40.5 -250
    Edited By: sponge1430 Dec 20th, 2010 at 09:57 PM
  15.  
    Originally Posted by DetUcf View Post

    You really think that the under for the game is -400?

    Somethings clearly wrong here, but im not going to say that its definitely the game total when its -400

    In case youre not leveling... ill reply.

    They are adjusted lines.

    ADJUSTED POINTSPREADS/TOTALS
    Dec 20......75001.....CHICAGO BEARS ADJ LINE..........o27½-230.....-13½+200
    8:35 PM.....75002.....MINNESOTA VIKINGS ADJ LINE.....u27½+180.....+13½-250
    Dec 20......75003.....CHICAGO BEARS ADJ LINE..........o42½+240.....+3½-700
    8:35 PM.....75004.....MINNESOTA VIKINGS ADJ LINE.....u42½-300.....-3½+485
    Edited By: Jaybone2315 Dec 20th, 2010 at 10:05 PM
  16.  
    Originally Posted by Niceguy View Post

    Betting with bookies seems like such a hassle.

    Can't you guys just go to the casino and place them?


    fffffuuuuuu
  17.  
    Originally Posted by zander View Post

    Lesson one, virgin gambler. O/U is for the game, not the team...

    I still like the under, but it's not a wonderful price.

    it even says combined total points in your description above, where's the confusion?

    Lesson Two, you can bet on O/Ul for a team as well as the game - geez you people
    Edited By: yoyoyo666 Dec 20th, 2010 at 10:23 PM
  18. Clearly is an adjusted O/U for combined score.....betting noobs itt.
     1
  19.  
    Originally Posted by yoyoyo666 View Post

    Lesson Two, you can bet on O/Ul for a team as well as the game - geez you people


    Well, considering that the actual Viking team total for this game is only 12.5... if you can get that total at 43.5 (and only at -400), you must have the dumbest bookie in the world.
    Edited By: Jaybone2315 Dec 20th, 2010 at 10:29 PM
  20.  
    Originally Posted by Jaybone2315 View Post

    In case youre not leveling... ill reply.

    They are adjusted lines.

    ADJUSTED POINTSPREADS/TOTALS
    Dec 20......75001.....CHICAGO BEARS ADJ LINE..........o27½-230.....-13½+200
    8:35 PM.....75002.....MINNESOTA VIKINGS ADJ LINE.....u27½+180.....+13½-250
    Dec 20......75003.....CHICAGO BEARS ADJ LINE..........o42½+240.....+3½-700
    8:35 PM.....75004.....MINNESOTA VIKINGS ADJ LINE.....u42½-300.....-3½+485

    Jesus, I mean, bet however much you can get down on this bet!!!!!!!

     
    Originally Posted by Jaybone2315 View Post

    Well, considering that the actual Viking team total for this game is only 12.5... if you can get that total at 43.5 (and only at -400), you must have the dumbest bookie in the world.

    & this but sometimes they put up bad lines but in most cases the action will be considered a no bet
     
  21. "In case youre not leveling... ill reply.

    They are adjusted lines.

    ADJUSTED POINTSPREADS/TOTALS
    Dec 20......75001.....CHICAGO BEARS ADJ LINE..........o27½-230.....-13½+200
    8:35 PM.....75002.....MINNESOTA VIKINGS ADJ LINE.....u27½+180.....+13½-250
    Dec 20......75003.....CHICAGO BEARS ADJ LINE..........o42½+240.....+3½-700
    8:35 PM.....75004.....MINNESOTA VIKINGS ADJ LINE.....u42½-300.....-3½+485"


    Yeah this is similar to what I have on my book. It just looked too confusing at first, but after reading some of the replies. I have come to the conclusion that it is most definitely the totals for both teams, and not the team totals.

    Oh well, guess it was too good to be true. Thanks for all the help.

    y0y0y0y0y083 the virgin sports better. lol
    Thread Starter
  22. Even as combined score this is a great bet... GL
    Edited By: Gateman07 Dec 21st, 2010 at 01:07 AM

Similar Threads