Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
Edited By: Hateflops Dec 30th, 2010 at 07:14 PMHere ya go.Originally Posted by FRANKGATES
you still have no told me how:
15storys above jet impact caused 80 storys below to collapse without resistance at freefall speed in ten seconds.
^this is all that matters. nothing else.
Go ahead, we will wait. -
frank youre a clown. its called physics. being that you dont believe this can freefall despite numerous engineers telling us how it happens, what is your theory?? you really think bombs were planted inside the building??? by who??? and how?
Originally Posted by FRANKGATES
No. you didnt answer my well thought out post about HOW/WHAT was the cause of both towers COLLAPSING.
You had 0 answer you just came back with some strawman idiotic question. you answered a question with a question.
you still have no told me how:
15storys above jet impact caused 80 storys below to collapse without resistance at freefall speed in ten seconds.
^this is all that matters. nothing else.
its like talking to a wall. like explaining color to a blind man -
quite possibly yes. however im not sure whose more nuts, people that actually believe what theyre told or what they see for themselves. I for one, 9 years later, to this day have never seen a real survellience video of a 747 crashing into the pentagon. for that matter no one has. those videos have not been leaked for the public to see. Logically one would than come to the conclusion without real solid video evidence why should anyone believe that a 747 did crash into it?
-
So again we're onto a different subject? Because you maybe read what I linked and can't refute it? Lol love how u just skip around to diff topics.
Originally Posted by FRANKGATES
quite possibly yes. however im not sure whose more nuts, people that actually believe what theyre told or what they see for themselves. I for one, 9 years later, to this day have never seen a real survellience video of a 747 crashing into the pentagon. for that matter no one has. those videos have not been leaked for the public to see. Logically one would than come to the conclusion without real solid video evidence why should anyone believe that a 747 did crash into it?
-
.
Originally Posted by FRANKGATES
so your telling me. People in caves that have 0 experience flying 747s (yes they took flight lessons) never actually flew 747s tho until the hijacking. Successfully defeated a billion $ defense system and managed to hit 3/4targets with no navigation.
Wrong
Even managed to divebomb the pentagon, the most highly survellienced building without even getting caught on tape!!
Wronger
then managed to defy the laws of physics with how the twin towers actually collapsed. and even caused a THIRD 47 story building to collapse without actually flying a plane into that one!!
Wrongest
wow. oh and the mastermind has still never even been found!! or punished for his crime! just wow.
you people are fucked. thats a conspiracy theory for ya.
Wrongerest -
nah i didnt bother to read it. theres 0 point. you didnt read www.ae911truth.org neither sides will be moved off their stance so this "debate" or watever u want it should end right now lol. cuz neither side is ever gonna convince the other side. thats all there is to it!
Originally Posted by Hateflops
So again we're onto a different subject? Because you maybe read what I linked and can't refute it? Lol love how u just skip around to diff topics.
i got a great life in my igloo in vancouver bc so im gonna let this topic be n lurk the rest of this subject cuz lets get real we arent ever gonna come to an agreement so lets just agree to disagree! -
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Originally Posted by FRANKGATES
i got a great life in my igloo in vancouver bc so im gonna let this topic be n lurk the rest of this subject cuz lets get real we arent ever gonna come to an agreement so lets just agree to disagree!
He concedes. We WIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WOOHOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -
Edited By: Hateflops Dec 30th, 2010 at 07:27 PMAgain you are wrong, I did infact read it! Also, I can be moved off of my stance which IMO is the biggest difference between normal people and truthers. We INDEED can be moved off of our stance with credible evidence and admissions from people.Originally Posted by FRANKGATES
nah i didnt bother to read it. theres 0 point. you didnt read www.ae911truth.org neither sides will be moved off their stance so this "debate" or watever u want it should end right now lol. cuz neither side is ever gonna convince the other side. thats all there is to it!
i got a great life in my igloo in vancouver bc so im gonna let this topic be n lurk the rest of this subject cuz lets get real we arent ever gonna come to an agreement so lets just agree to disagree!
That is easily the biggest difference. We infact can be moved off of our stance! While truthers no matter what has been drawn up will never under any circumstance change their minds.
Thank you for letting us win this argument once again. -
Edited By: j_money24 Dec 30th, 2010 at 07:29 PMI'm an engineer and I can tell you that being an engineer != being smart. I know a lot of really really really really hopelessly stupid engineers. Just sayin'Originally Posted by z06fanatic
I doubt architects/engineers would tie their name and business to something if they didn't 100% support it, and its pretty clear that these people know a lot more than anyone here.
And that's just with respect to physics and engineering, which says nothing about common sense or logic. Factor in those things and I can easily see there being a lot of stupid people who are also engineers who think there's some 9/11 conspiracy. -
.
Edited By: Willywoo Dec 30th, 2010 at 07:32 PM
Reason: oops -
yay, finally you argue with something of intelligence - what took so long to google this? Anyways Ill try to argue these points to the best of my knowledge.
Originally Posted by jetsjets1028
http://www.debunking911.com/thermite.htm
I only skimmed this but maybe some of the "experts" and "scholars" in OT can refute some of this.
1.Yes the columns had to be cut down after the towers fell - of course the steel beams go directly to the foundation under the street so of course they wouldnt of been 100% destroyed with explosives.
2.Regards to thermite - this article isn't arguing the finding of thermite at ground zero - why was thermite related chips found in the rubble? Id be interested to hear how it could exist outside of being put there. I do agree thermite alone couldn't destroy those columns - those columns are massive and theres 47 of them, but I think the argument is there was explosives used outside of thermite alone - large amounts of thermite would definitely help to weaken the core, but ultimately thermite alone wouldnt be enough to collapse those beams, and thermite wouldnt allow them to collapse straight down as they did. Id be curious to hear if they use thermite in controlled demolitions.
3.The videos they show of workers at 9/11 working over a light source doesnt make any sense - of course thats not molten steel. I dont know the chracteristics of molten steel but I dont know if it would even exist 12+ hours after the towers fell if indeed it did exist during the explosions.
I guess the main argument of the video was columns cut by 9/11 cleanup crews and not thermite - well no shit. It is pretty crazy though to see how thick those columns were and there were 47 of them all destroyed(well there was probalby 10 feet like of the columns). Pretty amazing that a small fire would do that. -
Those truthers are not posting because they are confused. They think that the exclamation point in your post was a typo. You should explain it to them.
Originally Posted by j_money24
I'm an engineer and I can tell you that being an engineer != being smart. I know a lot of really really really really hopelessly stupid engineers. Just sayin'
And that's just with respect to physics and engineering, which says nothing about common sense or logic. Factor in those things and I can easily see there being a lot of stupid people who are also engineers who think there's some 9/11 conspiracy. -
woops
Edited By: Hateflops Dec 30th, 2010 at 07:38 PM -
-
huh? did you even read my response? you gotta read more before you start randomly clicking buttons
-
Your definition of a small fire and mine are different.
Respectfully, the reason this cannot be debated intellegently is because you refuse to put forward a theory of what did happen.
Whether you see it or not, some of the questions I have asked in the last 2 pages are very important. Try answering them and try putting forward your theory of what happened that day, who may have been behind it, and how they were able to fool everyone (except Canadians...jkjkjkjk). -
Btw I'm going to go work out I'll be back later for some entertainment! Hopefully a truther will have a drawn out theory about 9/11 and what happened and why by the time I get back! Instead of bits and pieces that seem odd.
GLGLGLGLGL!!! -
I used the term small fire because theres been numerous reported fires that burned much longer and were more extravagant then the 9/11 fires that didnt lead to a building collapse. Im trying to argue the WTC building collapses, not some huge theory as to what happened - I sort of think the whole conspiracy sounds a little far fetched without first discussing how the twin towers fell, so I decided to argue factual information rather then nonsense. Who cares what my theory is anyways - these 3 massive towers fell that day and I want to argue what was the cause.
Originally Posted by jetsjets1028
Your definition of a small fire and mine are different.
Respectfully, the reason this cannot be debated intellegently is because you refuse to put forward a theory of what did happen.
Whether you see it or not, some of the questions I have asked in the last 2 pages are very important. Try answering them and try putting forward your theory of what happened that day, who may have been behind it, and how they were able to fool everyone (except Canadians...jkjkjkjk).
Yes, it is hard to argue something "intellegently" when you cant spell it correctly :) I kid I kid
hopefully you learn to read and comprehend during this time -
So all you care about is how they were brought down?
You are OK with the theory that members of Al Qaeda were behind 9/11 and you just think there was another element to their plot? That being that not only did they fly planes into the buildings but that they also detonated explosives at the same time?
Sounds fine to me. -
Well the be honest I just started looking into all of this a week or two ago - Bush, Cheney, and the government in control around 2000 wanted war - thats for sure - the "think tank" members even wrote about how another Pearl Harbor like event would be a great way to rebuild defenses and bring revolutionary change in America. I mean its obvious the amount of money tied to going to war - it stimulates the economy, makes a ton of money for defense contractors, and in the early part of the 2000s, brought a very strong unity with Americans. As far as how the exact attacks were carried out in this theory, I do not know - I figured Id look into the WTC buildings collapsing first before looking into the whole picture - if the WTC collapse made sense, then I wouldnt look further - it would be pointless. But generally speaking, to think a bunch of morons living in Saudi Arabia could come to the US, attend flight school, become good enough to fly these massive commerical aircrafts, get through security at an airport with knives on them, kill the pilots and take over the plane without any distress signals being sent out, and then proceed to fly them into the twin towers and pentagon sounds like a very tough task to complete. Lets discuss things we might be able to understand rather then argue theories that are very hard to prove
Originally Posted by jetsjets1028
So all you care about is how they were brought down?
You are OK with the theory that members of Al Qaeda were behind 9/11 and you just think there was another element to their plot? That being that not only did they fly planes into the buildings but that they also detonated explosives at the same time?
Sounds fine to me. -
This seems like a tough task to complete but the US government being involved seems plausible to you? Not as hard to somehow hatch a plan to kill their own citizens to enhance defense and make defense contractors rich without any information coming forward 9 years later seems easier to you.
Originally Posted by z06fanatic
But generally speaking, to think a bunch of morons living in Saudi Arabia could come to the US, attend flight school, become good enough to fly these massive commerical aircrafts, get through security at an airport with knives on them, kill the pilots and take over the plane without any distress signals being sent out, and then proceed to fly them into the twin towers and pentagon sounds like a very tough task to complete.
You don't think one person that knew this plan was coming would leak that information before or after. How many people have to be involved in forming and implementing the plan. Not one person before or nine years after leaks anything regarding this plan. This theory (trust me I already know you will say no I didn't say that I understand the game plan of Truthers) seems easier to you. -
Oh I definitely agree - both are pretty outrageous ideas to think about, thats why Im looking into things without just accepting the fact
Originally Posted by CaptinMorgan
This seems like a tough task to complete but the US government being involved seems plausible to you? Not as hard to somehow hatch a plan to kill their own citizens to enhance defense and make defense contractors rich without any information coming forward 9 years later seems easier to you.
You don't think one person that knew this plan was coming would leak that information before or after. How many people have to be involved in forming and implementing the plan. Not one person before or nine years after leaks anything regarding this plan. This theory (trust me I already know you will say no I didn't say that I understand the game plan of Truthers) seems easier to you. -
Ok back!
Shocking
Not one theory posted. Carry on. -
Incorrect.
Says the guy that keeps linking and referring to a site called debunking911.com. Can I borrow your super cool ironing picture please.
Debunker engineers are a lot smarter than truther engineers apparently. Thank you for your input sir!Originally Posted by j_money24
I'm an engineer and I can tell you that being an engineer != being smart. I know a lot of really really really really hopelessly stupid engineers. Just sayin'
And that's just with respect to physics and engineering, which says nothing about common sense or logic. Factor in those things and I can easily see there being a lot of stupid people who are also engineers who think there's some 9/11 conspiracy.
So the sheep are saying these guys aren't experts? Or are all of them just at the bottom of their respected fields?Originally Posted by Hoobangin
According to http://www.ae911truth.org/
1,402 verified architectural and engineering professionals and 10,723 other supporters
have signed the petition demanding of Congress
a truly independent investigation.
If you click on the 1402 that is underlined on the front page it links you to all their personal information. From there you can click on each person to go to their profile where they each have personal 911 statements. That is quite a few experts right there that all question the official story. Or do these ones not count because that website is not reputable in some way? -
Look into WTC 7 building. Its really all the information you need.
Similar Threads
-
24 Replies
Just took a dump in the pentagon...
By LVpokerdealer in Off Topic
Last Post: Oct 13th, 2009, 11:13 PM - 72 Replies
-
14 Replies
More Pentagon Conspiracy...Good Video...
Last Post: May 19th, 2006, 11:56 AM -
8 Replies
ONLY if you've seen new 9/11 Pentagon video
Last Post: May 16th, 2006, 11:40 PM - 11 Replies










