-
From his Twitter he has been running like God. Lets hope he plays great and runs even better.
Jamie Armstrong @jamers15
2.7 mill coming back to 12/24 final table of 10 live stream somewhere on wsop.
1 - Jamie Armstrong- 2,500,000
2- Noah Vaillancourt- 1,450,000
3- Eric Baldwin - 720,000
4 - Eric Davis - 560,000
5- Dan Smith -535,000
6 - John Esposito - 388,000
7 - Jean-Louis Santoni - 381,000
8 - Michael Gathy - 380,000
9 - Jonathon Poche - 374,000
10 - Joshua Field -370,000
PJ and basebaldy 1-2 one time -
No JJprodigy one time?
-
There is also pokernews, which is pretty damn accurate when it gets down to the FT: http://www.pokernews.com/live-report...limit-hold-em/
-
link to stream anyone?
-
gogogogogogo PJ. I remember railing jamers before it was cool.
-
Gogogo jammers!
-
http://www.wsop.com/2012/live-video/default.aspx
It will show available when it is up and streaming, which it isn't yet. -
TID!
-
tyty lets gooooooooooooooooooooooooooo pj
Originally Posted by that_pope
http://www.wsop.com/2012/live-video/default.aspx
It will show available when it is up and streaming, which it isn't yet. -
Please bust that scumbag JJ right now!
-
Who wants to go rail?!?!
-
Basebaldy ftw. Jamers 2nd. JJ 3rd.
-
murder, death, kill, you know the drill
-
lol wtf mkind
-
Gogogooo jammers! Take that bitch down and get the first of many bracelets
-
gogogogogogo
-
I think the commentators were wrong literally every time they tried to put Frankenburger on a hand the other night when he was heads up with Ivey. I didnt like it. I dont know who it was. They were really good players I'm guessing. They would make little backhanded comments about Frankenburger and they overanalyzed everything. On top of that basically everything they analyzed they were wrong about. It sounds like I'm being a little over the top but I'm not. They were wrong like every single time. "I'm pretty sure Frankerbuger is weak right here. Blah blah blah. Yeah, Frankenburger looks weak to me here." Then he'd have like top pair. They treated they guy like he was a rec player. They'd be discussing some sort of strategy or something like that then imply that Frankenburger probably wouldnt know what it was. Just little shit like that. They killed dead air though. It was better than nothing. I enjoyed the Razz feed a lot more. I liked being able to hear the announcer guy at the table. (m drawing a blank on the offical name) I guess in a game like hold em you really dont even need that guy. They're useful in stud games though
Edited By: XXEDPXX Jun 12th, 2012 at 11:53 PM -
what a baller
-
Originally Posted by XXEDPXX
I think the commentators were wrong literally every time they tried to put Frankenburger on a hand. I didnt like it. I dont know who it was. They were really good players I'm guessing. They would make little backhanded comments about Frankenburger and they overanalyzed everything. On top of that basically everything they analyzed they were wrong about. It sounds like I'm being a little over the top but I'm not. They were wrong like every single time. "I'm pretty sure Frankerbuger is weak right here. Blah blah blah. Yeah, Frankenburger looks weak to me here." Then he'd have like top pair. They treated they guy like he was a rec player. They'd be discussing some sort of strategy or something like that then imply that Frankenburger probably wouldnt know what it was. Just little shit like that. They killed dead air though. It was better than nothing.
tho














