you're a queer because you'd rather not bang 4 VS models in lieu of living a lie.

As for your other question, i've decided from that other thread that arguing with you is pointless. Peace be with you.

 

Originally Posted by gutbirdxx

you're a queer because you'd rather not bang 4 VS models in lieu of living a lie.

As for your other question, i've decided from that other thread that arguing with you is pointless. Peace be with you.

What do you keep calling him a queer for? WTF you are goddamn loser.

 

Originally Posted by snaggs

yeah but your opinion and the Constitution are two very different things...

Probably true. My reasoning is superior in this case, tho.

can it not be both?

 

Originally Posted by gutbirdxx

you're a queer because you'd rather not bang 4 VS models in lieu of living a lie.

As for your other question, i've decided from that other thread that arguing with you is pointless. Peace be with you.

how did this thread get some redneck homophobic all fired up and on a rampage?

Meh wgaf?

The weirdest thing is the insane mindset of thecommunity. Look at what that driver bish is alleging. Some cops came up to the car "without a traffic stop" (?), pull dude from the car and then shoot him for some reason, then plant a gun, all for...shits and giggles? Idk. These are the same idiots that think thebart cop that shot oscar grant decided to shhot a cuffed guy in the back while sitting on him, in front of hundreds of witnesses, bc he didnt like black people. Oy

so they found the suspect in the back seat but fail to say whether anyone else was in the front passenger seat. Did anyone else catch that?

I like that the lady who says he didn't do anything wrong also said he was shot in the head. Sounds like a reliable witness.

lol at some of those comments


I had noted before that no statement concerning so much as the recovery of a gun as evidence had been issued by the police. Now they tell us about the gun, which changes my position on the shooting some, although not entirely. The cops did what they had to with what they had to defend themselves, but I still object to the arming of non-military police officers with firearms. Better training in hand-to-hand combat instead of firearms use would have given the officers in question a decent chance of disarming the suspect without risk to bystanders. Without guns, no stray police bullet ever would have killed eagle scout and Clarkson University graduate David Scaringe! If you want a safe neighborhood, you will never have that while 300+ cops carry guns around it!

Comment by NoMoreBull — December 31st, 2011 @ 1:11 pm

If I was a cop I would hope I had more than a "decent" chance of not being shot

 

Originally Posted by JRoth15

I know everybody read the entire article, so I shouldn't have to mention this, but the loaded .22 that the victim was toting was identified as the same gun (by looks) by the original robbery victim.

That's really confusing...basically Nahcream robbed somebody, and they identified the gun he was carrying as being the same that he used for the robbery. So it's about 0% that police planted it.

I don't know exactly what happened, but I do love how the family of the victim's are always saying "he was such an upstanding young boy...didn't deserve this." He has a prior criminal history...has a warrant out for his arrest...and just committed a robbery...sounds like such an upstanding citizen.

Yeah I doubt there's more than one black kid with a loaded .22.

 

Originally Posted by nowapowa

yeah why can't everyone have wholesome Christian names like real people?

christian names > names involving dairy products

and my opinions on Christians is pretty well documented around here

 

Originally Posted by kellykip

If you'd rather have everyone think you fucked 4 VS models that you didn't even touch than fuck 4 VS models but have nobody ever know, then there's a good chance you're gay bro.

ok....

 

Originally Posted by killingbird

how did this thread get some redneck homophobic all fired up and on a rampage?

Because it has to do with cops shooting a black teen and the community being upset about it.

 

Originally Posted by rungoodmuch

It sounds like people believe that 2 police officers ask a man to get out of the car, the man responds and gets out of the car in a relaxed manner, then the 2 cops just attack and shoot this man? Peoples perception on policing is totally misconstrued. It is clear that the 19 year old kid didnt not want to go to jail that night and put up a fight. With his prior history, it sounds like he was someone who couldnt deal with stress that easily and snapped, went for his handgun and as of a result was shot. It sounds like the police officers were doing their job.

that sort of flies in the face of past facts about similar police brutality.

Amadou Diallo was a 23-year-old Guinean immigrant in New York City who was shot and killed on February 4, 1999 by four New York City Police Department plain-clothed officers: The four officers fired a total of 41 shots. All four officers were acquitted. Diallo was unarmed at the time of the shooting.

This story just keeps on giving. Terminated? For real?

http://capitalregion.ynn.com/content...nity-backlash/