What I mean is, Tiger Woods has the best golf ability of all time ever. However, he is also in extremely good physical shape, so, although he has the top spot in golf ability, his physical fitness is also very good, not bad, so his ratio is nowhere near the most severely inverted.

What I'm looking for is, which golfer has the most positive units golf ability per negative units lack of fitness ratio in all of golf.

For example, Phil Mickelson and Vijay Singh both have slight pot bellies, as well as "bitch tits", yet still have extremely high golf ability, not as good as Tiger, but still way up there, so they would be wayyyyyy way higher on the golf ability to negative physical fitness inverted ratio rankings compared to Tiger for example. Maybe one of the two of them is the correct answer to this thread even, although, I don't know enough about golf to know if there are some guys who are considerably flabbier/in shittier physical fitness than them that are almost as good in golf ability as them, and thus have them beat for the top spot of most extreme golf ability to negative physical fitness inverted ratio in the world, which is why I'm asking.

Also, remember, the golf ability is still half of the equation. So obv it can't be someone like John Daly, since altho he might have been near the very most extremely physically unfit of all the golfers, his golf ability isn't as high as some of the other golfers that were almost as unfit as him but had better career averages etc.

So, I'm looking for the one that has the most super duper high amount of golf ability/success with the most super duper bad amount of fitness/flabby/shitty physical shapeness in the world, basically.

I don't follow golf, but I know a lot of you guys follow it religiously, and probably know some good answers for this, so I'm curious (I find it funny/interesting whenever there is a person who is absurdly out of shape, yet ridic alien-good at golf, so I've always been curious which one exemplified this to the most extreme extent, basically).

The Walrus by infinity

Daly is a good golfer tho...

 

Originally Posted by tommpat2000

Laura Davies

well played Mauer

Yea, I think people are confusing what I meant by "golf ability" though.

I didn't mean "golf talent". I meant the combination of golf talent into actual success/results. So, in terms of pga wins or whatever Daly isn't nearly as high as some other guys who are in similarly bad, or maybe even worse shape than him, but with better actual career results.

Like, I get that if this guy was skinny maybe he'd be better than Tiger, but, I'm not caring about "potential" if in actual real life it hasn't translated into the results yet.

It has to be a person who, altho super fat/flabby/shitty shape has sick talent AND sick results (sicker than Daly (unless in even way shittier shape than Daly then maybe even if not sicker results than Daly would surpass him on the inversion ratio list thing or whatever)

Tim Herron

how many people have sicker results than daly?

He's won 2 majors, 9 tournaments on the 3 major tours.

Quit trying to act like the easy answer isn't the right answer.

nicklaus got recruited for football and his grandson was/is a highly touted TE if I recall correctly.

Correct answer has to be Stadler/Daly.

 

Originally Posted by ChocoThunder

.

Quit trying to act like the easy answer isn't the right answer.

this and wtf is the point of this thread anyway?

 

Originally Posted by ChocoThunder

how many people have sicker results than daly?

He's won 2 majors, 9 tournaments on the 3 major tours.

Quit trying to act like the easy answer isn't the right answer.

It's not that John Daly isn't great, it's that he isn't that fat, sloppy, or disgusting IMO

Yea he has a big beer belly and his weight at times has gotten way out of hand but he's also a really big, strong, and super flexable guy.

The Walrus is far better in relation to his build and athleticism but he's not the answer either.

Laura Davies is

While I don't have anything like the all-round knowledge many of you seem to, Daly gets my vote. Looks like a tub of goo and fucking mashes it every time. Pity he can't stay disciplined.

Holy shit lol, I just googled Laura Davies. This can't be real

 

Originally Posted by ChocoThunder

ok here's the deal

Craig Stadler played nearly every week for 20 years to get those results.

Daly played half the time and half drunk the entire time and had similar results.

Majors are the tournaments that mean the most, where pros try the hardest, on the hardest courses, with all of the elite pros playing. Most of the weekly tournaments have 1/3 of the top 15 playing in them and they are easier to win.

In that case I guess it's probly pretty close between them. Sounds like Daly has twice as much ability maybe, but Stadler looks twice as out of shape, so kind of a coinflip.

Unless there's someone even more ridic looking than either of them with similar results (I hope so, cuz for some reason i find it awesome when there's someone who practically wheelchair-fat that is somehow raping golf).

I remember seeing some pics a few years ago when I first came on here of various poker players who were supposed to be really good at golf, and some of them looked even fatter/more shittily out of shape than even this Walrus guy, so I wondered what the most extreme case is as far as decent pro golfers go. It's just a perverse fetish thing about golfers, I can't rly explain it lol

David Duval is the opposite example. The more fit he became, the worse his game sucked.

Kevin Stadler was one that came to mind besides the obvious John Daly.

wow you don't know what a major is and you're making a golf thread?