Originally Posted by P0KERDUUDE

please dont vote for her if she runs for president.

...except in the primaries please. DO vote for her in the primaries.

 

Originally Posted by userid363

 

Originally Posted by norcaljeff

if the haters listed what exactly is so bad about her. I would genuinely like to know b/c she seems to have stirred up a shitstorm in ot just by deciding not to run for reelection. personally, I'm hoping one of them is "because she thinks seeing russia from her house qualifies her to be potus". guess why! lol

Yes. That is the single most abhorrent thing about a run for president. Logic-impairment. Lack of intelligence. No one this dumb has sniffed the presidency since Dan Quayle. Only someone with above-average intelligence should even be in the primary.

Too bad that wasn't the standard previous to the current president...

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/03/19/...ects-stimulus/

The biggest single chunk of stimulus money that Palin is turning down is $160 million for education. There�s also $17 million in Department of Labor funds (vocational rehabilitation services, unemployment services, etc.), about $9 million for Health and Social Services and about $7 million for Public Safety.

Wired Science, part of the Wired blog network, discusses her views on teaching creationism in public school science classes. (Merriam-Webster defines �creationism� as �<SPAN class=sense_content>a doctrine or theory holding that matter, the various forms of life, and the world were <SPAN class=formulaic>created</SPAN> by God out of nothing and usually in the way described in Genesis [the first book of the Judeo-Christian Bible].�) They refer to an article in the Anchorage Daily News covering a 2006 Alaska gubernatorial debate:
</SPAN>

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/0..._n_122382.html

Grist reports that Alaska Governor Sarah Palin strongly opposes the Alaskan gas tax, threw money at Alaskans to quiet their concerns over rising energy costs, and "recently sued the Interior Department over its decision to list the polar bear as a threatened species."

Shooting a scared, tired wolf from a plane. Sarah Palin approved a $400,000 state-funded propaganda campaign to promote aerial hunting.



How could anyone not vote for this stellar example of a jesus loving humanitarian.

 

Originally Posted by phils08

gavin newsome 1x

Nice level

 

Originally Posted by phils08

 

Originally Posted by gamma21

 

Originally Posted by phils08

gavin newsome 1x

Nice level

why?

He's run San Francisco into the ground.

it really doesn't matter who the Republican candidate is... by the time the socialist empire is fully implemented, the GOP campaign is going to have the heavist arsenal in history to defeat the incumbent clownshoe in 2012. Every swing voter is already gone for Ubama... they are all saying now "why in the fuck did I vote for this guy?"

Obviously, the people getting free stuff and the radical leftists (like those in this thread) will continue voting for him, but the swing voters who got him the 53-47 popular win... if they aren't all gone already, they will be by the time the bread lines have formed in 2012...

 

Originally Posted by randolf

So, what you are saying, is that feminist groups are a one issue clique?

they actually are. that issue is women's rights. who knew?

 

Originally Posted by resilient

it really doesn't matter who the Republican candidate is... by the time the socialist empire is fully implemented, the GOP campaign is going to have the heavist arsenal in history to defeat the incumbent clownshoe in 2012. Every swing voter is already gone for Ubama... they are all saying now "why in the fuck did I vote for this guy?"

Obviously, the people getting free stuff and the radical leftists (like those in this thread) will continue voting for him, but the swing voters who got him the 53-47 popular win... if they aren't all gone already, they will be by the time the bread lines have formed in 2012...

lol. you might want to check his approval rating. history says you suck at this, as do current facts.

i see a trend here

gallup has the same numbers. 53% is far off from the 68% he enjoyed just a few short months ago. the somewhat approve has dropped the most, the strongly disapprove has gone up the most.

weeeeeeee, skewing is fun.

 

Originally Posted by ginwilly

gallup has the same numbers. 53% is far off from the 68% he enjoyed just a few short months ago. the somewhat approve has dropped the most, the strongly disapprove has gone up the most.

weeeeeeee, skewing is fun.

is 53% a majority? have all swing voters left obama like res said? did I ever say his approval hasn't dropped? did you skew what I said?

wtf?

damn neeek, i like you better when you just post smarky one-liners (or is that neek, shit).

ok, i'll get serious with ya for sec, i agree that res was wrong, not ALL swing voters have left, if he had said most had, or most are leaving he would have been right. Not really sure why this is worth arguing though, i'm pretty sure if you nailed him down he'd admit there was atleast 1 swing voter still backing him and that would make him wrong.

 

Originally Posted by tilterstom

there are alot of stupid people in this country... It will be a landslide victory reelection for obama

lol yah

Simple really:

8 years of Bush, people vote for change.

8 years of Obama, people will vote for change.