Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
http://money.cnn.com/2011/04/12/news...dex.htm?hpt=C1
Edited By: BigJohn804 Apr 13th, 2011 at 12:05 AM
I'm literally astounded that I just read this article on CNN... if something like this pops up on MSNBC, I'm finding a bomb shelter.
"What Obama has said: In his most recent budget request, the president proposed letting the top two income tax rates revert to 39.6% and 36%, up from 35% and 33% today. He also called for an increase in the capital gains and dividend rates to 20% that high-income households pay, up from 15% today. And he would reduce the value of their itemized deductions and personal exemptions. All told, those proposals -- which would affect individuals making at least $200,000 and couples making $250,000 and up -- would reduce deficits by just under $1 trillion over 10 years." -
The bottom 47% pay no fed inc tax. The rich 2% pay over 50%of ALL Fed Income tax all by themselves. But people keep saying tax the rich tax the rich?? WTF people?? They are taxed the shit out of.
Edited By: niptuck Apr 13th, 2011 at 12:09 AM
It is sfeasy to point the finger at the other guy and say "make him pay more".
The worst part is the attitude. If people really understood what freeloading crybabies they were and thanked the rich guys for jobs and for paying everyone elses tab, I wouldn't mind paying more.
Reason: somebody post a graph or chart plz -
Why are you freaking out?
-
When I'm through taxing the rich, I usually like to have a sandwich. potus'smmv
-
Yeah, that increase of 4.6% to the top marginal rate is going to absolutely destroy the economy. I remember when it was that way under Clinton. Dark times.
-
welp time to red x.
Was hoping this would not turn into another tax debate. -
1) tax rich
2) profit
3) vacation??? -
you were hoping a tax thread wouldn't turn into a tax debate? lol
I wonder why the dems didn't/haven't instituted some tax on billionaires (or 500-millionaires, or even 50-millionaires). Like an extra 10-20& for the super-dooper-rich. Not many would oppose it, right? It wouldn't affect the guy who made a shitload this one year because he sold his business he built for 40 years, it wouldn't affect guys that had one great year (for the most part), just the uber-rich. But I don't see that. weird?
maybe it wouldn't bring in that much "revenue"? idk -
The writer of it was trying to predict what Obama is going to say in his speech on Wednesday. The writer predicted that Obama would talk about raising the taxes because he had previously. I doubt that happens considering he just extended tax cuts.
I'm guessing he mentions a lot of stuff the deficit commission talked about including:
-tax reform (removing a lot of deductions and simplifying code)
-rising health care costs
-entitlement reform -
About time.
Edited By: Rocket Surgeon Apr 13th, 2011 at 12:36 AM
Let's be honest here. In the absence of some extreme reforms that people (me - tax code) want, there are 3 levers we're working with right now.
(1) Taxes
(2) Non-Defense Spending
(3) Defense Spending
We just fought like hell over 38B in cuts to (2). 38 Billion. And they were hard cuts too (grants for state/local police, HIV and disease prevention programs, low income heating assistance). All told, they don't even make a dent in our problem.

(3) is basically off the table, although lately there has been some feigned interest in cuts that will never materialize.
The only thing left is revenue. Getting 1T over 10 years out of a 4.6% marginal tax increase for highest tax bracket seems reasonable to me given the options. It's not the total solution, but a combination of spending cuts and tax increases is the only thing that could possibly come close. And spending cuts includes the monstrosity that is our defense budget. -
The bottom 50% also have less than 10% of the nation's wealth. The rich are also able to incorporate and divert assets, and avoid taxation. When a corporate tax rate is 35% yet most corporations don't pay federal corporate taxes and another 60+% report no tax liability, something is fucked up.
Originally Posted by niptuck
The bottom 47% pay no fed inc tax. The rich 2% pay over 50%of ALL Fed Income tax all by themselves. But people keep saying tax the rich tax the rich?? WTF people?? They are taxed the shit out of.
.
I'll be more than happy to pay a 10-15% flat tax if all loopholes are closed both corporately and personally. -
QFT
Originally Posted by Rocket Surgeon
About time.
Let's be honest here. In the absence of some extreme reforms that people (me - tax code) want, there are 3 levers we're working with right now.
(1) Taxes
(2) Non-Defense Spending
(3) Defense Spending
We just fought like hell over 38B in cuts to (2). 38 Billion. And they were hard cuts too (grants for state/local police, HIV and disease prevention programs, low income heating assistance). All told, they don't even make a dent in our problem.

(3) is basically off the table, although lately there has been some feigned interest in cuts that will never materialize.
The only thing left is revenue. Getting 1T over 10 years out of a 4.6% marginal tax increase for highest tax bracket seems reasonable to me given the options. It's not the total solution, but a combination of spending cuts and tax increases is the only thing that could possibly come close. And spending cuts includes the monstrosity that is our defense budget. -
its as easy to point the finger and say "make him pay more" as it is to point the finger and say, "the freeloading crybabies want our $". stop being such a simpleton and realize that it is a complicated issue and both sides have valid points.
Originally Posted by niptuck
The bottom 47% pay no fed inc tax. The rich 2% pay over 50%of ALL Fed Income tax all by themselves. But people keep saying tax the rich tax the rich?? WTF people?? They are taxed the shit out of.
It is sfeasy to point the finger at the other guy and say "make him pay more".
The worst part is the attitude. If people really understood what freeloading crybabies they were and thanked the rich guys for jobs and for paying everyone elses tab, I wouldn't mind paying more. -
Lost the lottery to get tickets for Obama's speech tomorrow :(
-
Originally Posted by niptuck
The bottom 47% pay no fed inc tax. The rich 2% pay over 50%of ALL Fed Income tax all by themselves. But people keep saying tax the rich tax the rich?? WTF people?? They are taxed the shit out of.
It is sfeasy to point the finger at the other guy and say "make him pay more".
The worst part is the attitude. If people really understood what freeloading crybabies they were and thanked the rich guys for jobs and for paying everyone elses tab, I wouldn't mind paying more.
I would gladly pay more if I knew it was going to benefit the country as a whole.
Problem is that nothing will most likelg change except I will pay more.
I pay more
the government continues to waste it
the lazy leeches remain lazy
then the government asks.for more from the rich
Rinse and repeat -
Totally agree, except that the Dems will raise taxes give 90% of the revenue to their campaign contributors for boondoggle projects then everyone will be pissed. Republicans will be back in and will cut taxes for their campaign contributors and we'll be 'broke' again. I can't remember the last time there was a government program that wasn't 95% corporate welfare
Originally Posted by AmSlim22
its as easy to point the finger and say "make him pay more" as it is to point the finger and say, "the freeloading crybabies want our $". stop being such a simpleton and realize that it is a complicated issue and both sides have valid points.
BTW: @Niptuck - this is why people point at the rich crowd, they get stereotyped with the beneficiaries of the majority of the government handouts -
bummer LS, that would have been a cool experience. I would love to hear an Obama speech live, the dude is a rock-star.
I think niptuck gets a raw deal here. I've read him write a few times that he was able to become successful because he utilized the tools available to him and if others followed suit they could too. I've heard some liberals say they became successful because they utilized the tools available but others won't be able to because they are (insert excuse du jour), yet niptuck gets called the arrogant one. -
I used to believe niptuck's shtick about the bottom half not paying income tax. But when I did my taxes this year, I had to pay. I'm in the top half of earners? You got sources on that?
-
I went to an Obama rally in Oakland in 2007. It was awesome, but there were 10-20k people there and I only arrived like 2 or 3 hours early, so I couldn't really see him. The auditorium he's speaking in tomorrow has a couple hundred seats at the absolute maximum. Would've been awesome.
Originally Posted by ginwilly
bummer LS, that would have been a cool experience. I would love to hear an Obama speech live, the dude is a rock-star.
On the plus side tho, I'm having a couple classes cancelled tomorrow because Secret Service is locking down the building (the auditorium is on the first floor of our Media and Public Affairs building where I have the overwhelming majority of my classes).
I am also having class in the White House Briefing Room on Thursday...but we just got word yesterday that Obama will be out of town..gg my fantasies that he'd poke his head in and say hello. So many disappointments this week, sigh.
Infinite lolsOriginally Posted by ginwilly
I think niptuck gets a raw deal here.
-
So I looked at some statistics from irs.gov that seem to contradict what niptuck claims about "the bottom 47% pay no fed inc tax". Looks like even some people who have a gross adjusted income of $1-$5,000 can still end up paying something.
Edited By: LoveHatePoker Apr 13th, 2011 at 03:34 AM
http://www.irs.gov/taxstats/indtaxst...=98123,00.html -
niptuck won't tell you about all the business owners who can make it appear they made no money using deductions and funny accounting practices.
Edited By: dolphin13 Apr 13th, 2011 at 03:49 AM
think about it this way. If 2/3 of corporations are able to get out of paying taxes how many individuals are able to get out of paying taxes? -
Not on either side but there is a better argument to tax the highest brackets more. Overall they have access to resources that should enable them to find the deductions and exclusions that people in lower brackets don't take advantage of.
-
Corporations and the top 2% of income earners want to eliminate entitlements because we can't afford them. Corporations and the top 2% of income earners don't want to eliminate tax shelters, write offs and tax breaks because they are entitled to them. Simple as that.
Edited By: saxman Apr 13th, 2011 at 04:05 AM
Similar Threads
- 38 Replies
-
10 Replies
Obama- great President, or greatest president?
Last Post: Feb 28th, 2009, 12:45 PM -
63 Replies
Why I believe the rich should get tax breaks...and no, I'm not rich....
By LVpokerdealer in Off Topic
Last Post: Sep 14th, 2008, 04:59 AM -
26 Replies
Kazakhstan President sends 5 spys to kill Pres. Bush!, Attempt at assinating a US President?!! freakin WOW
By Buchsbaumy in Off Topic
Last Post: Feb 9th, 2007, 03:01 AM











