-
Marvin Wilson, Texas Man With 61 IQ, To Be Executed In Days
Edited By: EyeKnows Aug 4th, 2012 at 10:53 PM
"In their bid to halt the execution, Wilson's allies point to a 2004 psychological exam that measured his IQ at just 61. In Texas, the benchmark for mental retardation is an IQ of about 70 or below. Other states use a threshold IQ of 75 or lower."
"This case really does very much push the line," said Paul Campos, a professor at the University of Colorado Law School, who is not involved with Wilson's defense. "We're talking about a mental child."
His conviction was based on the testimony of his co-defendant's wife, she said Wilson told her he pulled the trigger. Her husband was sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole, how convenient.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1739342.html -
Should a person with an IQ of 61 be able to reproduce? I can definately agree to them having one kid as they would not be capable of taking care of two.
-
Where do we draw the line for equal rights.
Police dogs wanna be equal to policemen. -
Fry him
-
It does seem that there's a lack of aggravating factors here and many mitigating factors.
In a normal felony murder case, though, the non-shooter is just as culpable as the shooter. If there are aggravating circumstances, I think you can put the non-shooter to death.
All this is moot, though, as 61 IQ should be mentally handicapped in any state. As the defense attorney stated, if you can dismiss a 61 IQ, the SC's ruling is a hollow rule. Let the states decide, pfff. It's Texas, ffs. -
i may be crazy, but isnt it possible to manipulate an IQ test (not saying the case here as I have no details)
-
anyone who hits a 61 didn't get there by intending to. imio (inexpert)
Edited By: userid363 Aug 5th, 2012 at 01:39 AM
they didn't really say why the prosecution objected to the 61 rating, just said that his behavior showed normal intelligence (didn't say what behavior) and so the findings were mixed. wtf? -
Pretty sure I could zero if I wanted or damn close
-
I have nothing against dolphin and am fairly positive he would win, so let's make this for a perma-ban??
-
ill bet a lot on dolphin too
-
just remember, laces OUT
-
looooool Tompat cannot be serious
-
Wouldn't do for ban, but pride for sure
Edited By: Co1one1_Forbin Aug 5th, 2012 at 09:58 PM
Teamviewer or something? Can't do tonight as I'm golfing/ drinking but maybe after work tomorrow before I'm too drunk?Smokey, I aint the brightest guy in the world, but from where I'm standin, it looks like you over there takin a shit....
Edit: lol accidental paste at the end
Also FYI usually by 120-150 on these and have never lost a bet on one
Get your bets in folks -
Edited By: dolphin13 Aug 5th, 2012 at 10:13 PMso you have taken an online IQ test, got a score of 150 and think that is realistic/means any thing.Originally Posted by tommpat2000
Wouldn't do for ban, but pride for sure
Teamviewer or something? Can't do tonight as I'm golfing/ drinking but maybe after work tomorrow before I'm too drunk?Smokey, I aint the brightest guy in the world, but from where I'm standin, it looks like you over there takin a shit....
Edit: lol accidental paste at the end
Also FYI usually by 120-150 on these and have never lost a bet on one
Get your bets in folks
I think you've just taken your IQ test and failed. and I'm not talking about the night you handed 1500 bucks to some dude with a plastic badge. -
You are the one who agreed that comparing scores would be acceptable. I never said a word about what it meant
Also, it was 3k and real cops and will bet you any amount up to 10k ( only liquid I got now) that I can prOve via courts
And only 500 was for me, 2500 for friends of which I am still owed Lille ~ 1100 -
I thought we were betting on who could get the lowest score?
-
Why are we putting Tommpat against Dolphin. Lets make it competitive
Tommpat vs Marvin Wilson -
Will the winner be a Plattsburgh nominee?
-
I've never understood the problem with killing a retard murderer (besides standard DP objections). too retarded to not know better? too retarded to live imo. "Oh, he didn't know what he was doing! He doesn't understand!" my point exactly
(not saying in this case as the "co-defendant's wife said he did it" seems dot dot dot) -
If killing retards is wrong, I don't want to be right.
-
I know, right? I mean, if you are walking down the street and a piece of used gum, something shiny and strangling a child hold the same amount of interest for you you really should be put down.












