So there's this movie called IN TIME... starring JT...premise is that evry1 lives for 25 yrs then a clock on ther wrist starts and they get a one year countdown... people can add to this time by working, etc. aka all $ is now time tthat you have on your wrist..

So JT ends up w 100 years and wants in on the nosebleed action... true NLHE... they apparently play for a little while and JT is up decent time then....

In the hand in question the scene starts when the players are on the turn on board: 7c Qh 5s Jc Timberlakes opponent has QQ and bets 50 years into Justin JyMaster Timberlake whos floating a gutter w 84o and without hesitation calls... the river epically comes the 6d giving JT his luckbox straight... his opponent promptly bets 2 centuries rofl... which puts Timbs allin but before he calls, JT says "I THINK YOU'RE WEAK!" hahaha wp with the epic box bink and speech... they cud have at least given him 98 for the double gutter... too funny

I love JT, suited or unsuited, doesn't matter.

98 would be the double gutter....9T is an open ender :)

 

Originally Posted by EyeKnows

I love JT, suited or unsuited, doesn't matter.

Suited


UnSuited



Definitely folding JTunsuited...

 

Originally Posted by sandler1860

98 would be the double gutter....9T is an open ender :)

I meant 98o obv but was typing fast in a drunk rant laughing/watching the movie and that was the least important part... ya digggg... and statistically a double gutter and an open ender is a wash neway...

he called when the guy had trup QQ? fkn idiot

The poker scene was laughable like all modern movies and the portrayal of gambling or cards... as for the movie:

*Note: All work is my own with links as reference only

In Time (2011)
Director - Andrew Niccol
PG-13; 109 Min
Cast
Justin Timberlake - Will Salas
Amanda Seyfried - Sylvia Weis
Cillian Murphy - Raymond (Timekeeper)

For those of you who go to movies because of a hot actress, you can do a lot worse than an Amanda Seyfried movie of late. The girl is just straight smoking hot. Her body of work is actually quite impressive, more so her actual body, but still a few decent films along the way.

Let's take a few seconds to examine this actress:

Unfortunately for us the movie is PG-13 and it plays out exactly like a PG-13 movie in terms of wasting such young talent, but I have a feeling we'll be seeing a lot more of her in the future, with fingers crossed. She's actually not a terrible actress for the type of films she takes either...

Ok, so the movie In Time takes a look at a world where everyone is essentially given a 1 year death sentence when they turn 25 via a genetic countdown timer in their arm. With time being so valuable it has now become the only currency, with people exchanging time for good and services and also people being robbed and murdered for their time. As long as you are able to add time to your clock you live on, but once your time runs out, so do you.

As you can imagine, the movie is filled with cliches and ridiculous lines - "Do you come from time?" the wealthy heiress Sylvia (Seyfried) asks the new-comer Will (Timerblake) to the affluent Greenwich, a city that clearly denotes all the wealth and uppity people, whereas Will comes from a distant time zone ghetto. It gets a little old a little quickly to hear these lines, but the concept is decent enough to get you through without walking out. My main complaint with the world is just how easy it is to transfer time between people. I mean, you simply lock arms and if you turn one way you gain someone's time... seems a little silly that a genetic code put into humans would be allowed to be manipulated so easily.

I don't have much more to say, or, rather, I don't want to spend much more time. This is Justin Timberlake so, yeah, it is what it is, but the bright spot int he film is probably the Timekeeper played by Cillian Murphy who, though he himself is never given enough depth, is deeper than the rest of the cast. It is of course a silly film with chases and unbelievable story lines involving rich people who can't die but take no risks either and poor people who do whatever they have to in order to survive... Somewhere in here there is a good story and in a sense, it was last year's film Never Let Me Go (2010) which was a pretty good film with Carrie Mulligan that explored a world in which children are raised for the sole purpose to have their organs harvested at a young age.

This wasn't a terrible time at the movies, but it is definitely a time-killer.

*** out of 5

With the minds they have in Hollywood, I don't think I'll ever understand why they can't consult with an actual GD card player one time to make sure they stop fking up scenes. Apparently nobody has ever won a hand and not slowrolled the shit out of it.

 

Originally Posted by skeeze666

JT doesn't care. JT doesn't give a shit.

what were the blinds? 5year/Decade?

 

Originally Posted by Appst08

Amanda Seyfried is so unreal. Those pillows up top are amazing. and fwiw JT is my 2nd favorite actor. que "fag" "not sure if cereus" but for real this dude just puts on good role after good role. Almost made bad teacher watchable too

don't know if this is generally known but people that can do comedy, which is unbelievably difficult to do well, can do drama like it was nothing. JT is very funny, could easily be an snl cast member.

I agree with Skeeze, but i'm little lower on the quality of the film.

If you think the poker scene of the movie was done in poor taste with little reality, the economics of the movie are infinitely poorer. A topic that has many millions of more man hours dedicated to its study, should get a consultant in the credits.

And the theft of time is faaaar too easy given the advanced tech of the time. they couldn't think of a firewall or something?

i lol'd at "justin jymaster timberlake"

 

Originally Posted by clwhat

he called when the guy had trup QQ? fkn idiot

LOOOOOOOOL winner

 

Originally Posted by SCTrojans

looooooool awesome

+1